Impact of Baseline Mitral Regurgitation on Postoperative Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy.
Journal
Transplantation proceedings
ISSN: 1873-2623
Titre abrégé: Transplant Proc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0243532
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
11
10
2018
revised:
08
12
2018
accepted:
17
01
2019
entrez:
14
4
2019
pubmed:
14
4
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Currently, there are no guidelines for management of moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of baseline MR on short and midterm survival in patients who had LVAD as destination therapy (DT). The DT-LVAD patients were classified into 2 groups based on baseline MR status: ≥ moderate MR and < moderate MR. Baseline clinical characteristics and post-LVAD implant adverse events were compared. Unadjusted mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years were analyzed. Of 91 patients studied, 62 (68%) had ≥ moderate MR before LVAD implantation; ≥ moderate MR patients had a higher incidence of concomitant pulmonary disease (11% vs 0%; P = .001) and ≥ moderate tricuspid regurgitation (55% vs 23%, P = .004) than < moderate MR patients. Other baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. Post-LVAD adverse events did not differ between the 2 groups. Survival rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years for both groups (≥ moderate MR vs < moderate MR) were 90% vs 100% (P = .03), 63% vs 90% (P = .001), and 52% vs 83% (P = .002), respectively. On multivariable analysis, age, female sex, ≥ moderate tricuspid regurgitation, and ≥ moderate MR at baseline were found to be independent predictors of overall all-cause mortality. Overall survival was significantly lower in the ≥ moderate MR group than the < moderate MR group (log-rank test, P = .03). In DT LVAD patients, ≥ moderate MR is common and is associated with worse survival at both short and midterm follow-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Currently, there are no guidelines for management of moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of baseline MR on short and midterm survival in patients who had LVAD as destination therapy (DT).
METHODS
METHODS
The DT-LVAD patients were classified into 2 groups based on baseline MR status: ≥ moderate MR and < moderate MR. Baseline clinical characteristics and post-LVAD implant adverse events were compared. Unadjusted mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years were analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 91 patients studied, 62 (68%) had ≥ moderate MR before LVAD implantation; ≥ moderate MR patients had a higher incidence of concomitant pulmonary disease (11% vs 0%; P = .001) and ≥ moderate tricuspid regurgitation (55% vs 23%, P = .004) than < moderate MR patients. Other baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. Post-LVAD adverse events did not differ between the 2 groups. Survival rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years for both groups (≥ moderate MR vs < moderate MR) were 90% vs 100% (P = .03), 63% vs 90% (P = .001), and 52% vs 83% (P = .002), respectively. On multivariable analysis, age, female sex, ≥ moderate tricuspid regurgitation, and ≥ moderate MR at baseline were found to be independent predictors of overall all-cause mortality. Overall survival was significantly lower in the ≥ moderate MR group than the < moderate MR group (log-rank test, P = .03).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In DT LVAD patients, ≥ moderate MR is common and is associated with worse survival at both short and midterm follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30979476
pii: S0041-1345(18)31231-4
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.053
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
859-864Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Inc.