A job-exposure matrix addressing hand exposure to wet work.
Exposure
Job-exposure matrix
Occupational dermatitis
Occupational hand eczema
Wet work
Journal
International archives of occupational and environmental health
ISSN: 1432-1246
Titre abrégé: Int Arch Occup Environ Health
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7512134
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
09
10
2018
accepted:
10
04
2019
pubmed:
18
4
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
18
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to create a job-exposure matrix (JEM) for wet work. A JEM is a tool used to assess exposure to potential health hazards in occupational epidemiological studies. It can be used when counselling concerning job change/job choice, as a medico-legal tool when recognizing diseases as occupational and when planning interventions regarding prevention of, in this case, occupational hand eczema. The study population was based on results from national surveys on working environment performed by the National Research Centre for the Working Environment in Denmark in 2000, 2005, and 2010 (National Research Centre for the Working Environment). We assessed responses on questions regarding wet hands, glove wear and total wet work. For the JEM a cutoff of 2 h total wet work/day was chosen as the exposure measurement. The proportion of responses of 2 h total wet work/day in each profession is illustrated as a number between 0 and 1 equal to 0-100% of the responses. Total wet work was most frequent among cleaners (domestic, office, and hotel cleaning), butchers and fishmongers, cooks, beauticians (hairdressers, barbers, related work) and health care workers (home-based personal workers, dentists, dental assistants). Regarding differences between sexes we found that indifferent of age and profession, women had 78% higher odds of having wet work. We found that wet work as an exposure varies among professions depending on whether wet hands or glove wear is assessed. A JEM is a useful tool to assess the extent of the exposure, wet work, independent of prior perceptions of classical wet work professions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30993421
doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01435-2
pii: 10.1007/s00420-019-01435-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
959-966Références
Br J Dermatol. 2003 Dec;149(6):1214-20
pubmed: 14674899
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Oct;51(4):159-66
pubmed: 15500664
Contact Dermatitis. 2014 Jan;70(1):56-62
pubmed: 24102286
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1999 Nov;72(8):496-506
pubmed: 10592001
J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Jul;121(1):37-40
pubmed: 12839561
Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Dec;55(6):317-21
pubmed: 17101004
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(4):283-9
pubmed: 12010073
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1986;128:1-63
pubmed: 2949472
Contact Dermatitis. 1990 Sep;23(3):154-61
pubmed: 2149316
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998 Feb;71(1):7-13
pubmed: 9523243
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Feb;152(2):296-301
pubmed: 15727642
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jun;168(6):1281-6
pubmed: 23413840
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Apr;50(4):225-9
pubmed: 15186378
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2015 Jan;13(1):e1-22
pubmed: 25763418
Contact Dermatitis. 2017 Oct;77(4):214-223
pubmed: 28449354
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Jan;78(1):55-63
pubmed: 29076572
Contact Dermatitis. 2010 Feb;62(2):75-87
pubmed: 20136890
J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Jul;127(7):1632-40
pubmed: 17301829
Contact Dermatitis. 2017 Mar;76(3):138-145
pubmed: 27709631