Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation.
Computer-Assisted Instruction
/ methods
Confusion
Decision Making
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
/ methods
Female
Humans
Learning
Male
Medical Errors
/ prevention & control
Motivation
Program Evaluation
Self Efficacy
Simulation Training
/ methods
Students, Medical
/ psychology
User-Computer Interface
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
16
11
2018
accepted:
04
04
2019
entrez:
24
4
2019
pubmed:
24
4
2019
medline:
15
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Medical error is a significant cause of patient harms in clinical practice, but education and training are recognised as having a key role in minimising their incidence. The use of virtual patient (VP) activities targeting training in medical error allows learners to practice patient management in a safe environment. The inclusion of branched decision-making elements in the activities has the potential to drive additional generative cognitive processing and improved learning outcomes, but the increased cognitive load on learning risks negatively affecting learner motivation. The aim of this study is to better understand the impact that the inclusion of decision-making and inducing errors within the VP activities has on learner motivation. Using a repeated study design, over a period of six weeks we provided undergraduate medical students at six institutions in three countries with a series of six VPs written around errors in paediatric practice. Participants were divided into two groups and received either linearly structured VPs or ones that incorporated branched decision-making elements. Having completed all the VPs, each participant was asked to complete a survey designed to assess their motivation and learning strategies. Our analysis showed that in general, there was no significant difference in learner motivation between those receiving the linear VPs and those who received branched decision-making VPs. The same results were generally reflected across all six institutions. The findings demonstrated that the inclusion of decision-making elements did not make a significant difference to undergraduate medical students' motivation, perceived self-efficacy or adopted learning strategies. The length of the intervention was sufficient for learners to overcome any increased cognitive load associated with branched decision-making elements being included in VPs. Further work is required to establish any immediate impact within periods shorter than the length of our study or upon achieved learning outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31013295
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215597
pii: PONE-D-18-33033
pmc: PMC6478293
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0215597Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Med Teach. 2005 May;27(3):193-9
pubmed: 16011941
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55
pubmed: 28029643
Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(1):59-70
pubmed: 24628063
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):759-63
pubmed: 19811215
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):82-91
pubmed: 10620383
Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):303-11
pubmed: 19335571
JAMA. 2006 Aug 9;296(6):696-9
pubmed: 16896113
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 18;17(6):e151
pubmed: 26088435
Med Teach. 2015;37(10):926-34
pubmed: 25313934
Acad Med. 1999 Feb;74(2):178-85
pubmed: 10065058
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):752-8
pubmed: 19811214
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;204(1):5-10
pubmed: 21187195
Med Teach. 2014 May;36(5):371-84
pubmed: 24593808
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 05;16(11):e240
pubmed: 25373314
BMJ. 2016 May 03;353:i2139
pubmed: 27143499
Med Educ. 2000 Sep;34(9):721-8
pubmed: 10972750
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):85-93
pubmed: 20078759
BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):501-2
pubmed: 11230049
Med Educ. 2011 Dec;45(12):1230-40
pubmed: 22026751
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Feb 01;15:11
pubmed: 25638167
Med Educ. 2011 Aug;45(8):792-806
pubmed: 21752076
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):683-4
pubmed: 19811203
Med Teach. 2011;33(11):933-7
pubmed: 22022903
Med Teach. 2015;37(9):813-8
pubmed: 25523009
Clin Teach. 2012 Apr;9(2):133-4
pubmed: 22405376
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Sep;14 Suppl 1:71-81
pubmed: 19669913
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Aug 01;12:62
pubmed: 22853706