RACHS - ANZ : A Modified Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery Model for Outcome Surveillance in Australia and New Zealand.
Age Factors
Australia
/ epidemiology
Benchmarking
/ standards
Cardiac Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Heart Defects, Congenital
/ diagnosis
Hospital Mortality
Humans
New Zealand
/ epidemiology
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Predictive Value of Tests
Quality Indicators, Health Care
/ standards
Registries
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
cardiac surgery
congenital heart disease
outcome and process assessment
pediatric
risk model
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 05 2019
07 05 2019
Historique:
entrez:
2
5
2019
pubmed:
2
5
2019
medline:
4
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Outcomes for pediatric cardiac surgery are commonly reported from international databases compiled from voluntary data submissions. Surgical outcomes for all children in a country or region are less commonly reported. We aimed to describe the bi-national population-based outcome for children undergoing cardiac surgery in Australia and New Zealand and determine whether the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery ( RACHS ) classification could be used to create a model that accurately predicts in-hospital mortality in this population. Methods and Results The study was conducted in all children's hospitals performing cardiac surgery in Australia and New Zealand between January 2007 and December 2015. The performance of the original RACHS -1 model was assessed and compared with an alternative RACHS - ANZ (Australia and New Zealand) model, developed balancing discrimination with parsimonious variable selection. A total of 14 324 hospital admissions were analyzed. The overall hospital mortality was 2.3%, ranging from 0.5% for RACHS category 1 procedures, to 17.0% for RACHS category 5 or 6 procedures. The original RACHS -1 model was poorly calibrated with death overpredicted (1161 deaths predicted, 289 deaths observed). The RACHS - ANZ model had better performance in this population with excellent discrimination (Az- ROC of 0.830) and acceptable Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit ( P=0.216). Conclusions The original RACHS -1 model overpredicts mortality in children undergoing heart surgery in the current era. The RACHS - ANZ model requires only 3 risk variables in addition to the RACHS procedure category, can be applied to a wider range of patients than RACHS -1, and is suitable to use to monitor regional pediatric cardiac surgery outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31039662
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011390
pmc: PMC6512128
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e011390Références
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;98(5):1653-8; discussion 1658-9
pubmed: 25262395
Hong Kong Med J. 2007 Aug;13(4):293-7
pubmed: 17664534
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e011390
pubmed: 31039662
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jun;25(6):911-24
pubmed: 15144988
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jan;123(1):110-8
pubmed: 11782764
JAMA. 1996 May 1;275(17):1322-8
pubmed: 8614117
N Z Med J. 2010 Jun 11;123(1316):47-65
pubmed: 20648099
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Apr;133(4):865-75
pubmed: 17382616
Pediatr Cardiol. 2009 Nov;30(8):1117-30
pubmed: 19771463
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;14(7):673-81
pubmed: 23863821
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):2201-6
pubmed: 25444193
Circulation. 1998 Feb 24;97(7):673-80
pubmed: 9495303
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e5
pubmed: 20123762
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Jan;8(1):50-60
pubmed: 21045784
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Feb;87(2):584-7
pubmed: 19161783
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 20;5(5):
pubmed: 27207997
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):278-85
pubmed: 12541154
Clin Chem. 1993 Apr;39(4):561-77
pubmed: 8472349
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;5(5):447-54
pubmed: 15329160
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Nov;138(5):1139-53
pubmed: 19837218