Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid in High-Risk Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial.


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 24 03 2019
accepted: 06 04 2019
pubmed: 2 5 2019
medline: 10 7 2020
entrez: 2 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid did not decrease the recurrence rate of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in this study. The efficacy could not be determined because of the small sample size.GCTB recurrences, even in the denosumab era, are still an issue; therefore, a randomized study exploring the efficacy of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant setting in GCTB is still valid. Bisphosphonates are assumed to inhibit giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB)-associated osteoclast activity and have an apoptotic effect on the neoplastic mononuclear cell population. The primary objective of this study was to determine the 2-year recurrence rate of high-risk GCTB after adjuvant zoledronic acid versus standard care. In this multicenter randomized open-label phase II trial, patients with high-risk GCTB were included (December 2008 to October 2013). Recruitment was stopped because of low accrual after the introduction of denosumab. In the intervention group, patients received adjuvant zoledronic acid (4 mg) intravenously at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. Fourteen patients were included (intervention Adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid did not decrease the recurrence rate of GCTB in this study. The efficacy could not be determined because of the small sample size. Because recurrences, even in the denosumab era, are still an issue, a randomized study exploring the efficacy of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant setting in GCTB is still valid.

Sections du résumé

LESSONS LEARNED
Adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid did not decrease the recurrence rate of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in this study. The efficacy could not be determined because of the small sample size.GCTB recurrences, even in the denosumab era, are still an issue; therefore, a randomized study exploring the efficacy of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant setting in GCTB is still valid.
BACKGROUND
Bisphosphonates are assumed to inhibit giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB)-associated osteoclast activity and have an apoptotic effect on the neoplastic mononuclear cell population. The primary objective of this study was to determine the 2-year recurrence rate of high-risk GCTB after adjuvant zoledronic acid versus standard care.
METHODS
In this multicenter randomized open-label phase II trial, patients with high-risk GCTB were included (December 2008 to October 2013). Recruitment was stopped because of low accrual after the introduction of denosumab. In the intervention group, patients received adjuvant zoledronic acid (4 mg) intravenously at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS
Fourteen patients were included (intervention
CONCLUSION
Adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid did not decrease the recurrence rate of GCTB in this study. The efficacy could not be determined because of the small sample size. Because recurrences, even in the denosumab era, are still an issue, a randomized study exploring the efficacy of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant setting in GCTB is still valid.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31040253
pii: theoncologist.2019-0280
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0280
pmc: PMC6656477
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bone Density Conservation Agents 0
Zoledronic Acid 6XC1PAD3KF

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00889590']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

889-e421

Informations de copyright

© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.

Références

Oncol Rep. 2001 May-Jun;8(3):643-7
pubmed: 11295095
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Aug;2(8):584-93
pubmed: 12154351
Calcif Tissue Int. 2004 Jul;75(1):71-7
pubmed: 15037971
Am J Pathol. 2004 Aug;165(2):593-600
pubmed: 15277232
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Sep;(426):103-9
pubmed: 15346059
J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Sep;21(9):1339-49
pubmed: 16939392
Bone. 2008 Jan;42(1):68-73
pubmed: 17962092
Acta Orthop. 2008 Feb;79(1):86-93
pubmed: 18283578
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep;134(9):969-78
pubmed: 18322700
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1060-7
pubmed: 18451399
J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):70-7
pubmed: 18767926
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Oct;91(10):1609-12
pubmed: 18972907
Cancer Treat Rev. 2010 Feb;36(1):1-7
pubmed: 19879054
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Mar;11(3):275-80
pubmed: 20149736
Eur J Cancer. 2010 May;46(7):1211-22
pubmed: 20347292
Sarcoma. 2010;2010:null
pubmed: 20706639
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):591-9
pubmed: 20706812
BMC Cancer. 2010 Aug 29;10:462
pubmed: 20799989
J Clin Pathol. 2011 Aug;64(8):701-5
pubmed: 21561891
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jun 13;11:241
pubmed: 21668953
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 1;36(17):E1166-72
pubmed: 21785300
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 15;37(6):E396-9
pubmed: 22076646
Onkologie. 2011;34(12):702-4
pubmed: 22156450
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 15;18(16):4415-24
pubmed: 22711702
Acta Orthop. 2012 Aug;83(4):401-5
pubmed: 22880716
Oncol Lett. 2013 Feb;5(2):447-451
pubmed: 23420680
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Aug;14(9):901-8
pubmed: 23867211
Connect Tissue Res. 2013;54(6):439-49
pubmed: 24060052
Bone. 2014 Jan;58:11-6
pubmed: 24120668
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(9):5379-83
pubmed: 24175830
Oncologist. 2014 May;19(5):550-61
pubmed: 24718514
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Sep;50(14):2425-31
pubmed: 25088085
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Aug 6;96(15):e127
pubmed: 25100780
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 3;96(23):1999-2007
pubmed: 25471915
Orthopedics. 2015 Jan;38(1):e25-30
pubmed: 25611416
Acta Orthop. 2015 Jun;86(3):393-5
pubmed: 25684041
Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2182-8
pubmed: 25940568
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):2860-8
pubmed: 26033180
Ann Oncol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2149-54
pubmed: 26205395
Connect Tissue Res. 2015 Nov;56(6):493-503
pubmed: 26327464
Clin Sarcoma Res. 2016 Sep 14;6(1):15
pubmed: 27651889
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jun;26(6):716-721
pubmed: 28338455
Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jan;25(1):409-419
pubmed: 29159783
Indian J Orthop. 2018 Jan-Feb;52(1):45-50
pubmed: 29416169
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Dec;76(12):1827-33
pubmed: 7989388

Auteurs

Astrid Lipplaa (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands a.lipplaa@lumc.nl.

Judith R Kroep (JR)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Lizz van der Heijden (L)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Paul C Jutte (PC)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Pancras C W Hogendoorn (PCW)

Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Sander Dijkstra (S)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Hans Gelderblom (H)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH