A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis.
Journal
Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
11
10
2018
pubmed:
6
5
2019
medline:
13
2
2020
entrez:
5
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up. A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130). Interim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS).
METHODS
METHODS
Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Interim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31054038
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5
pii: 10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5
pmc: PMC6733825
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3250-3259Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : NIH/NCATS UL1 TR000445
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Lymphology. 2001 Mar;34(1):2-11
pubmed: 11307661
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002 Sep;75(1):51-64
pubmed: 12500934
Lancet. 2005 Jan 1-7;365(9453):60-2
pubmed: 15639680
Cancer. 2008 Jun 15;112(12):2809-19
pubmed: 18428212
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jan-Feb;59(1):8-24
pubmed: 19147865
BMJ. 2010 Jan 12;340:b5396
pubmed: 20068255
Acta Oncol. 2010;49(2):166-73
pubmed: 20100154
Breast. 2010 Dec;19(6):506-15
pubmed: 20561790
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):907-14
pubmed: 21945108
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1303-10
pubmed: 25439688
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):977-1010
pubmed: 25467588
Lymphat Res Biol. 2014 Dec;12(4):289-94
pubmed: 25495384
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0126268
pubmed: 25875618
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S370-5
pubmed: 26085222
Lymphat Res Biol. 2015 Sep;13(3):176-85
pubmed: 26305554
Cancer Med. 2016 Jun;5(6):1154-62
pubmed: 26993371
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Dec 1;1(9):1055
pubmed: 27732688
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30
pubmed: 28055103
Acta Oncol. 2017 May;56(5):713-718
pubmed: 28105873
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Oct;16(5):446-452
pubmed: 29356592
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Oct;16(5):435-441
pubmed: 30130147