A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis.


Journal

Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 11 10 2018
pubmed: 6 5 2019
medline: 13 2 2020
entrez: 5 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up. A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130). Interim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS).
METHODS METHODS
Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Interim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31054038
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5
pii: 10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5
pmc: PMC6733825
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3250-3259

Subventions

Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : NIH/NCATS UL1 TR000445
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

Lymphology. 2001 Mar;34(1):2-11
pubmed: 11307661
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002 Sep;75(1):51-64
pubmed: 12500934
Lancet. 2005 Jan 1-7;365(9453):60-2
pubmed: 15639680
Cancer. 2008 Jun 15;112(12):2809-19
pubmed: 18428212
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jan-Feb;59(1):8-24
pubmed: 19147865
BMJ. 2010 Jan 12;340:b5396
pubmed: 20068255
Acta Oncol. 2010;49(2):166-73
pubmed: 20100154
Breast. 2010 Dec;19(6):506-15
pubmed: 20561790
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):907-14
pubmed: 21945108
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1303-10
pubmed: 25439688
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):977-1010
pubmed: 25467588
Lymphat Res Biol. 2014 Dec;12(4):289-94
pubmed: 25495384
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0126268
pubmed: 25875618
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S370-5
pubmed: 26085222
Lymphat Res Biol. 2015 Sep;13(3):176-85
pubmed: 26305554
Cancer Med. 2016 Jun;5(6):1154-62
pubmed: 26993371
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Dec 1;1(9):1055
pubmed: 27732688
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30
pubmed: 28055103
Acta Oncol. 2017 May;56(5):713-718
pubmed: 28105873
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Oct;16(5):446-452
pubmed: 29356592
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Oct;16(5):435-441
pubmed: 30130147

Auteurs

Sheila H Ridner (SH)

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. sheila.ridner@vanderbilt.edu.

Mary S Dietrich (MS)

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Michael S Cowher (MS)

Department of Surgery, Alleghany General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Bret Taback (B)

Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Sarah McLaughlin (S)

Section of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Nicolas Ajkay (N)

Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

John Boyages (J)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Louise Koelmeyer (L)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Sarah M DeSnyder (SM)

Division of Surgery, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Jamie Wagner (J)

University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, USA.

Vandana Abramson (V)

Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Andrew Moore (A)

Southeast Health Southeast Cancer Center, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA.

Chirag Shah (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH