Better late than never: why obstetricians must implement enhanced recovery after cesarean.


Journal

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 31 01 2019
revised: 07 04 2019
accepted: 26 04 2019
pubmed: 6 5 2019
medline: 22 1 2020
entrez: 6 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite persistent concerns about high cesarean delivery rates internationally, there has been less attention on improving perioperative outcomes for the millions of women who will experience a cesarean delivery each year. Enhanced recovery after surgery, a standardized, evidence-based, interdisciplinary protocol, has been successfully used in other surgical specialties including gynecology to improve quality of care and patient satisfaction while reducing overall health care costs through reduced length of stay. Enhanced recovery after surgery society guidelines for cesarean delivery were just released in August 2018. Obstetric patients, who face the dual challenge of being postpartum and postoperative, could benefit greatly from protocols that optimize their return to physiological function and reduce surgical morbidity. Although enhanced recovery after surgery has been widespread in other surgical specialties, uptake of this protocol in obstetrics has lagged behind. We believe enhanced recovery after surgery for cesarean delivery can effectively address 3 challenges faced by obstetrician/gynecologists. These are: (1) improving care for the high number of women undergoing cesarean deliveries; (2) using evidence-based care bundles to prevent maternal morbidity and mortality, address disparities, and reduce costs; and (3) limiting postoperative opioid prescribing in response to the opioid crisis. Enhanced recovery after surgery for cesarean delivery and other standardized care protocols have the potential to reduce the disproportionately high rates of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States, and ensure all patients, regardless of demographics or location, receive the same level of high-quality peripartum care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31055033
pii: S0002-9378(19)30615-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.030
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

117.e1-117.e7

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Alex Friedman Peahl (AF)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; National Clinical Scholars Program, Institute for Health Care Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: alexfrie@med.umich.edu.

Roger Smith (R)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Timothy R B Johnson (TRB)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Daniel M Morgan (DM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Mark D Pearlman (MD)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH