Design of the PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) Trial.
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
/ diagnostic imaging
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Choice Behavior
Decision Support Techniques
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Male
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Patient Preference
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
Veterans Health Services
Journal
Annals of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1615-5947
Titre abrégé: Ann Vasc Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8703941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
12
11
2018
revised:
25
01
2019
accepted:
21
02
2019
pubmed:
11
5
2019
medline:
22
9
2020
entrez:
11
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), randomized trials have found endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality than open surgical repair (OSR). However, OSR has fewer long-term aneurysm-related complications, such as endoleak or late rupture. Patients treated with EVAR and OSR have similar survival rates within two years after surgery, and OSR does not require intensive surveillance. Few have examined if patient preferences are aligned with the type of treatment they receive for their AAA. Although many assume that patients may universally prefer the less-invasive nature of EVAR, our preliminary work suggests that patients who value the lower risk of late complications may prefer OSR. In this study, called The PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) trial, we describe a cluster-randomized trial to test if a decision aid can better align patients' preferences and their treatment type for AAA. Patients enrolled in the study are candidates for either endovascular or open repair and are followed up at VA hospitals by vascular surgery teams who regularly perform both types of repair. In Aim 1, we will determine patients' preferences for endovascular or open repair and identify domains associated with each repair type. In Aim 2, we will assess alignment between patients' preferences and the repair type elected and then compare the impact of a decision aid on this alignment between the intervention and control groups. This study will help us to accomplish two goals. First, we will better understand the factors that affect patient preference when choosing between EVAR and OSR. Second, we will better understand if a decision aid can help patients be more likely to receive the treatment strategy they prefer for their AAA. Study enrollment began on June 1, 2017. Between June 1, 2017 and November 1, 2018, we have enrolled 178 of a total goal of 240 veterans from 20 VA medical centers and their vascular surgery teams across the country. We anticipate completing enrollment in PROVE-AAA in June 2019, and study analyses will be performed thereafter.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31075459
pii: S0890-5096(19)30289-4
doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.034
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
247-253Subventions
Organisme : HSRD VA
ID : I01 HX001880
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Cory Gaudette
(C)
Francisco Grippa
(F)
Amy Voorhees
(A)
Kayla Moore
(K)
Catherine Dowse
(C)
Sarah Barbey
(S)
Ann Galla
(A)
Lori Grove
(L)
Karen Belanger
(K)
Angela Karamoto
(A)
Veep Patel
(V)
Susan Bigda
(S)
Sinan Jabori
(S)
Kevin Chun
(K)
Julie Beckstrom
(J)
Maria Maloney
(M)
Molly Schieber
(M)
Adam Zoble
(A)
Stephanie Anderson
(S)
Michael Morrison
(M)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.