Diagnosis of urine leakage after bladder repair: a prospective comparative study of ultra-low-dose CT cystography and conventional retrograde cystography.
Anastomotic leakage
Computed tomography
Fluoroscopy
Radiation dosage
Journal
La Radiologia medica
ISSN: 1826-6983
Titre abrégé: Radiol Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0177625
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
24
07
2018
accepted:
28
04
2019
pubmed:
16
5
2019
medline:
11
10
2019
entrez:
16
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We performed this prospective cohort study to compare the accuracy and technical characteristics of ultra-low-dose CT cystography with those of conventional retrograde cystography. A cohort of 31 patients referred for cystography after bladder repair were enrolled. To detect urine leakage, we initially performed conventional cystography after retrograde distention of the bladder with dilute iodinated contrast material, followed by ultra-low-dose CT cystography. The diagnostic accuracy of these two modalities was compared, and the technical characteristics of ultra-low-dose CT cystography were examined. All 31 referred patients were included in this study. Of the 31 patients, 27 (87.1%) underwent bladder repair after radical prostatectomy, 3 (9.7%) after radical cystectomy, and 1 (3.2%) after bladder diverticulectomy. Four of the 31 patients were diagnosed with urine leakage by conventional cystography. These four patients were confirmed to have urine leakage by ultra-low-dose CT cystography. Another five patients who did not have urine leakage according to conventional cystography were diagnosed with urine leakage by ultra-low-dose CT cystography. Moreover, performing ultra-low-dose CT cystography enabled us to identify the precise location and amount of urine leakage in all nine patients. Based on these findings, we were able to establish a proper treatment plan. Ultra-low-dose CT cystography is an accurate method for evaluating urine leakage after bladder repair, and this technique may help determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for patients with urine leakage after bladder repair.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31087214
doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01041-9
pii: 10.1007/s11547-019-01041-9
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
812-818Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Nov;173(5):1269-72
pubmed: 10541103
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jan;174(1):89-95
pubmed: 10628460
Int J Urol. 2005 Nov;12(11):948-52
pubmed: 16351649
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Nov;187(5):1296-302
pubmed: 17056919
Abdom Imaging. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):367-70
pubmed: 17566817
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84
pubmed: 18046031
Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):254-63
pubmed: 18566177
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):396-401
pubmed: 18647908
Urology. 2009 Jan;73(1):124-6
pubmed: 18845321
Health Phys. 2008 Nov;95(5):502-7
pubmed: 18849682
BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(7):957-63
pubmed: 19076148
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):158-66
pubmed: 20851940
J Urol. 2010 Dec;184(6):2452-5
pubmed: 20952023
Clin Radiol. 2011 Mar;66(3):251-6
pubmed: 21295204
J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):369-76
pubmed: 22698622
Eur Radiol. 2012 Dec;22(12):2597-606
pubmed: 22699873
Int J Urol. 2013 Oct;20(10):980-5
pubmed: 23387512
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2117-23
pubmed: 23764073
JBR-BTR. 2013 Mar-Apr;96(2):90
pubmed: 23847831
Korean J Urol. 2013 Nov;54(11):756-61
pubmed: 24255757
Br J Radiol. 2014 Apr;87(1036):20130613
pubmed: 24646183
Biomed Environ Sci. 2014 Sep;27(9):718-28
pubmed: 25256861
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(7):2432-40
pubmed: 25833747
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Jul;165(1-4):125-8
pubmed: 25855077
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jun;204(6):1197-202
pubmed: 26001228
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Mar;168(3):388-95
pubmed: 26001827
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):3137-46
pubmed: 26197735