Insurers' perspective on barriers and facilitators for return to work after occupational injuries.


Journal

Work (Reading, Mass.)
ISSN: 1875-9270
Titre abrégé: Work
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9204382

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
entrez: 26 5 2019
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 16 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite the importance of the legislative and insurance systems in the return to work process after an occupational injury, the perspective of the insurer on what influences return to work has rarely been documented. To understand the barriers or facilitators for return to work, from the perspective of the insurer. A comprehensive qualitative approach was used. Semi-directed interviews were done with nineteen (19) insurers (claims adjudicator and rehabilitation case manager) from a Canadian workers' compensation board. A thematic analysis was done using QDA Minor Software. Fourteen themes (e.g. family reaction, quality of work relationship) were classified into four categories representing the main stakeholders: worker with disability, workplace, healthcare system and compensation system. Emotional, cognitive, and adaptive reactions from the worker and his family were identified. We observed that good work relations and support practices, lack of access to medical resources, focus on the employee's ability, and complexity and consequences of the compensation process are the main barriers and facilitators from the insurers' perspective. Many of the perceived elements are coherent with the compensation system's administrative and legal context. The results enable us to better understand the insurers' perspective regarding what influences return to work. It reinforces the necessity to consider the administrative and legal context to better understand the insurers' perspective.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite the importance of the legislative and insurance systems in the return to work process after an occupational injury, the perspective of the insurer on what influences return to work has rarely been documented.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To understand the barriers or facilitators for return to work, from the perspective of the insurer.
METHODS METHODS
A comprehensive qualitative approach was used. Semi-directed interviews were done with nineteen (19) insurers (claims adjudicator and rehabilitation case manager) from a Canadian workers' compensation board. A thematic analysis was done using QDA Minor Software.
RESULTS RESULTS
Fourteen themes (e.g. family reaction, quality of work relationship) were classified into four categories representing the main stakeholders: worker with disability, workplace, healthcare system and compensation system. Emotional, cognitive, and adaptive reactions from the worker and his family were identified. We observed that good work relations and support practices, lack of access to medical resources, focus on the employee's ability, and complexity and consequences of the compensation process are the main barriers and facilitators from the insurers' perspective. Many of the perceived elements are coherent with the compensation system's administrative and legal context.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results enable us to better understand the insurers' perspective regarding what influences return to work. It reinforces the necessity to consider the administrative and legal context to better understand the insurers' perspective.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31127747
pii: WOR192910
doi: 10.3233/WOR-192910
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

81-97

Auteurs

Marie-Maxime Robichaud (MM)

Faculty of Education, Centre de recherche et d'intervention sur l'éducation et la vie au travail (CRIEVAT), Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Manon Truchon (M)

School of Psychology, Université Laval, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Quebec, Canada.

Louise St-Arnaud (L)

Faculty of Education, Centre de recherche et d'intervention sur l'éducation et la vie au travail (CRIEVAT), Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Iuliana Nastasia (I)

Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH