Real-world study of efficacy, risk management and reasons for discontinuation of natalizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis in Russia.
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Immunologic Factors
/ administration & dosage
Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal
/ etiology
Male
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
/ drug therapy
Natalizumab
/ administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies
Risk Management
Russia
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
03
12
2018
accepted:
08
05
2019
entrez:
29
5
2019
pubmed:
29
5
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
NTZ is approved in Russia for the treatment of highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and is reimbursed via federal budget program. However, no data about NTZ treatment in Russia and the effect of federal reimbursement have been performed so far. To characterize the population of patients receiving natalizumab and assess the efficacy and risk-management plan (RMP) implementation of NTZ therapy in routine clinical practice in Russia. We analyzed data for 334 patients, who received at least one infusion of NTZ. Relapse rate, MRI activity, NEDA-3 status after 2 years were assessed. Anti-JC virus antibodies status and RMP implementation were evaluated. Drop-out rate and reasons for therapy discontinuation were analyzed. Patients switched to natalizumab in Russia are mainly female (63%), with median EDSS score of 3.5 and high disease activity: 93% had at least 1 relapse and 58% had both T1Gd+ and new T2 lesion a year before therapy initiation. Introduction of federal reimbursement allowed patients with less relapses to start therapy with natalizumab. The only predictor of 6-month progression was EDSS score at the baseline of therapy (HR = 2.1375, 95%CI 1.0026-4.5570, p = 0.0492). 82% patients reached NEDA-3 at 24 month of therapy. 25% of patients discontinued NTZ for reasons: tolerability (14.5%), JCV antibody status (61%), and patient's decision (17%). RMP was implemented in only 36% patients. Natalizumab appeared to have high efficacy in Russian clinical practice. Federal reimbursement allowed less active patients to start natalizumab. More efforts should be done to improve RMP implementation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
NTZ is approved in Russia for the treatment of highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and is reimbursed via federal budget program. However, no data about NTZ treatment in Russia and the effect of federal reimbursement have been performed so far.
OBJECTIVE
To characterize the population of patients receiving natalizumab and assess the efficacy and risk-management plan (RMP) implementation of NTZ therapy in routine clinical practice in Russia.
METHODS
We analyzed data for 334 patients, who received at least one infusion of NTZ. Relapse rate, MRI activity, NEDA-3 status after 2 years were assessed. Anti-JC virus antibodies status and RMP implementation were evaluated. Drop-out rate and reasons for therapy discontinuation were analyzed.
RESULTS
Patients switched to natalizumab in Russia are mainly female (63%), with median EDSS score of 3.5 and high disease activity: 93% had at least 1 relapse and 58% had both T1Gd+ and new T2 lesion a year before therapy initiation. Introduction of federal reimbursement allowed patients with less relapses to start therapy with natalizumab. The only predictor of 6-month progression was EDSS score at the baseline of therapy (HR = 2.1375, 95%CI 1.0026-4.5570, p = 0.0492). 82% patients reached NEDA-3 at 24 month of therapy. 25% of patients discontinued NTZ for reasons: tolerability (14.5%), JCV antibody status (61%), and patient's decision (17%). RMP was implemented in only 36% patients.
CONCLUSION
Natalizumab appeared to have high efficacy in Russian clinical practice. Federal reimbursement allowed less active patients to start natalizumab. More efforts should be done to improve RMP implementation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31136608
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217303
pii: PONE-D-18-34544
pmc: PMC6538157
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunologic Factors
0
Natalizumab
0
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.vg6jp14']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0217303Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
E.Evdoshenko has received honoraria for lectures and speaking in the past 2 years from Merck, Biogen, Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Genzyme, Generium. A.Stepanova has nothing to declare. M.Shumilina has received honoraria for consulting services in the field of scientific and educational activities (educational services, scientific articles, participation in expert councils, participation in clinical trials, etc.) in the past 2 years from Roche, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen, Genzyme/Sanofi, Novartis, Generium. M.Davydovskaya has received honoraria for lectures from Janssen, Roche, Sanofi, Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Biocad, Generium. N.Khachanova has received honoraria for participation in clinical trials from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Generium, TG Therapeutics, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals US LLC, Sanofi-Aventis, Rosh, Novartis, Biogen, Teva, Octapharma AG. N.Neofidov has received honoraria for lectures and speaking in the past 2 years Genzyme/Sanofi. I.Kalinin has nothing to declare. E.Popova has received honoraria for consulting services in the field of scientific and educational activities (educational services, scientific articles, participation in expert councils, participation in clinical trials, etc.) in the past 2 years from Roche, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen, Sanofi, Biocad, Generium. E.Dubchenko has nothing to declare. N.Pozhidaeva has nothing to declare. A.Volkov has received honoraria for lectures from Janssen S.Sivertseva has received honoraria for lectures and speaking in the past 2 years from Merck, Biogen, Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Genzyme, Generium. A.Prilenskaya has nothing to declare. N.Malkova has received honoraria as member of working groups, advisory boards, and participated in clinical trials supported by Biogen / Janssen, Merck, Teva, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Cellgene, Biocad, Generium. D.Korobko participated in clinical trials supported by Biogen, Teva, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Cellgene, Biocad, Generium. I.Vergunova participated in clinical trials supported by Biogen, Teva, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Cellgene, Biocad. S.Shchur has nothing to declare. G.Makshakov has received honoraria for lectures and speaking in the past 2 years from Roche, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen and Genzyme. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;85(11):1190-7
pubmed: 24532785
Neurology. 2014 Jul 1;83(1):78-86
pubmed: 24898925
Ann Neurol. 2007 Oct;62(4):335-46
pubmed: 17696126
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2015;115(8. Vyp. 2):25-35
pubmed: 28635712
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Mar;37(3):394-401
pubmed: 26564433
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 2;354(9):899-910
pubmed: 16510744
Mult Scler. 2018 Jun;24(7):963-973
pubmed: 28554238
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016 Jan 27;3(1):e195
pubmed: 26848486
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2016;116(10 Pt 2):79-97
pubmed: 28139616
Acta Neurol Belg. 2014 Sep;114(3):167-78
pubmed: 24915752