An experimental approach for estimating the genomic selection advantage for Fusarium head blight and Septoria tritici blotch in winter wheat.
Journal
TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik
ISSN: 1432-2242
Titre abrégé: Theor Appl Genet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0145600
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
06
12
2018
accepted:
17
05
2019
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
21
12
2019
entrez:
31
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The genomic selection advantage for Fusarium head blight is promising but failed for Septoria tritici blotch. Selection of new breeding parents based on predictions must be treated with caution. Genomic selection (GS) is an approach that uses whole-genome marker data to estimate breeding values of untested genotypes and holds the potential to improve the genetic gain in breeding programs by shortening the breeding cycle and increasing the selection intensity. However, reported realized gain from genomic selection is limited to few experiments. In this study, a training population of 1120 winter wheat lines derived from 14 bi-parental families was genotyped with genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism markers and phenotyped for Fusarium head blight (FHB) and Septoria tritici blotch (STB) severity, plant height and heading date. We used weighted ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction to calculate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) of 2500 genotypes. Based on GEBVs, we selected the most resistant individuals as well as a random sample and tested them in a multi-location field trial. We computed moderate coefficients of correlation between observed and predicted trait values for FHB severity, plant height and heading date and achieved a genomic selection advantage of 10.62 percentage points for FHB resistance compared to the randomly chosen subpopulation. Genomic selection failed for the improvement of STB resistance with a genomic selection advantage of only 2.14 percentage points. Our results also indicate that the selection of new breeding parents based on GEBVs must be treated with caution. Taken together, the implementation of GS for FHB resistance, plant height and heading date seems to be promising. For traits with very strong genotype × environment variance, like STB resistance, GS appears to be still challenging.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31144000
doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03364-7
pii: 10.1007/s00122-019-03364-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2425-2437Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 031B0011A+E
Références
Genet Res. 2000 Apr;75(2):249-52
pubmed: 10816982
Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
pubmed: 11290733
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Nov;107(7):1252-6
pubmed: 12928779
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Aug;111(4):747-56
pubmed: 15947905
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Feb;112(3):562-9
pubmed: 16362277
Genetics. 2006 Jul;173(3):1761-76
pubmed: 16648593
Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Sep;115(5):617-25
pubmed: 17607557
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Oct 20;119(1-2):126-30
pubmed: 17716767
Genetics. 2007 Nov;177(3):1881-8
pubmed: 18039886
J Anim Breed Genet. 2007 Dec;124(6):323-30
pubmed: 18076469
Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Jul;64(7):681-4
pubmed: 18366065
Genetics. 2008 Apr;178(4):2289-303
pubmed: 18430950
Pest Manag Sci. 2009 Feb;65(2):155-62
pubmed: 18833571
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Feb;118(4):695-702
pubmed: 19034409
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jan;92(1):16-24
pubmed: 19109259
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):433-43
pubmed: 19164653
Genetics. 2009 May;182(1):355-64
pubmed: 19299342
Brief Funct Genomics. 2010 Mar;9(2):166-77
pubmed: 20156985
Genetics. 2010 Jul;185(3):1021-31
pubmed: 20407128
Genetics. 2010 Oct;186(2):713-24
pubmed: 20813882
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Jan 21;43:5
pubmed: 21255418
Phytopathology. 2011 Oct;101(10):1209-16
pubmed: 21635143
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Mar;124(4):769-76
pubmed: 22075809
Genetics. 2012 Apr;190(4):1503-10
pubmed: 22271763
J Dairy Sci. 2012 May;95(5):2723-33
pubmed: 22541502
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Aug;125(4):759-71
pubmed: 22566067
Ann Bot. 2012 Nov;110(6):1303-16
pubmed: 22645117
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Feb;126(2):317-34
pubmed: 23052019
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57500
pubmed: 23451238
Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Feb;85(8):976-84
pubmed: 24196148
BMC Genomics. 2013 Dec 05;14:858
pubmed: 24308379
Plant Biotechnol J. 2014 Aug;12(6):787-96
pubmed: 24646323
Genetics. 2014 Sep;198(1):3-16
pubmed: 25236445
Front Genet. 2014 Oct 16;5:363
pubmed: 25360145
Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Mar;114(3):291-9
pubmed: 25407079
BMC Genomics. 2015 Jun 05;16:430
pubmed: 26044734
Fungal Genet Biol. 2015 Jun;79:3-7
pubmed: 26092782
Genetics. 2015 Oct;201(2):759-68
pubmed: 26219298
Theor Appl Genet. 2015 Dec;128(12):2471-81
pubmed: 26350496
Plant Sci. 2016 Jan;242:23-36
pubmed: 26566822
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Feb;129(2):431-44
pubmed: 26660464
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Apr;116(4):395-408
pubmed: 26860200
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Jun;129(6):1179-89
pubmed: 27067826
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2016 Aug 4;54:79-98
pubmed: 27491433
Plant Genome. 2017 Jul;10(2):
pubmed: 28724084
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Apr;132(4):1121-1135
pubmed: 30552455
Plant Dis. 2012 Jul;96(7):957-967
pubmed: 30727217
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1171-7
pubmed: 7786999