Arrhythmic burden among asymptomatic patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Aged
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
/ complications
Asymptomatic Diseases
Cardiomyopathies
/ complications
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
/ epidemiology
Defibrillators, Implantable
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Israel
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Ischemia
/ complications
Primary Prevention
/ methods
Prospective Studies
Survival Rate
/ trends
Appropriate therapy
Competing risk
Defibrillator
Ischemic cardiomyopathy
Primary prevention
Journal
Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
18
04
2018
entrez:
3
6
2019
pubmed:
4
6
2019
medline:
29
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The clinical benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in asymptomatic patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class I) with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction is continually disputed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, mortality rates, and appropriate device therapies by NYHA class in a prospective national ICD registry. The study comprised 1670 consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were implanted with a primary prevention ICD and enrolled in the prospective national Israeli ICD Registry from 2010. The risk for clinical and arrhythmic events was assessed by NYHA class. Asymptomatic patients (NYHA I) composed 19% of the study cohort. Comparison according to NYHA class showed that the highest mortality rate was in the NYHA III-IV group vs NYHA I and NYHA II (10.5% vs 5.4% and 5.8%, respectively; log rank P = .003). Conversely, cumulative incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, corrected for death as a competing risk, were higher among patients with NYHA I (11% vs 7%; P = .021). In a multivariate model, NYHA I vs ≥II remained independently associated with a significant 2-fold risk for appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio 2.03; 95% confidence interval 1.28-3.24). Our findings indicate that patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy without heart failure symptoms have a higher risk of appropriate ICD therapy compared with symptomatic patients after adjustment for the competing risk of death, suggesting possible incremental benefit of primary ICD implantation in this population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The clinical benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in asymptomatic patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class I) with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction is continually disputed.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, mortality rates, and appropriate device therapies by NYHA class in a prospective national ICD registry.
METHODS
The study comprised 1670 consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were implanted with a primary prevention ICD and enrolled in the prospective national Israeli ICD Registry from 2010. The risk for clinical and arrhythmic events was assessed by NYHA class.
RESULTS
Asymptomatic patients (NYHA I) composed 19% of the study cohort. Comparison according to NYHA class showed that the highest mortality rate was in the NYHA III-IV group vs NYHA I and NYHA II (10.5% vs 5.4% and 5.8%, respectively; log rank P = .003). Conversely, cumulative incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, corrected for death as a competing risk, were higher among patients with NYHA I (11% vs 7%; P = .021). In a multivariate model, NYHA I vs ≥II remained independently associated with a significant 2-fold risk for appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio 2.03; 95% confidence interval 1.28-3.24).
CONCLUSION
Our findings indicate that patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy without heart failure symptoms have a higher risk of appropriate ICD therapy compared with symptomatic patients after adjustment for the competing risk of death, suggesting possible incremental benefit of primary ICD implantation in this population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31153454
pii: S1547-5271(19)30299-1
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.030
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
813-819Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.