The effect of a maternal meal on fetal liver blood flow.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
23
01
2019
accepted:
14
04
2019
entrez:
13
6
2019
pubmed:
13
6
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During the third trimester of development, the human fetus accumulates fat, an important energy reservoir during the early postnatal period. The fetal liver, perfused by the nutrient-rich and well-oxygenated blood coming directly from the placenta, is assumed to play a central role in these processes. Earlier studies have linked fetal liver blood flow with maternal nutritional status and response to the maternal oral glucose tolerance test. Our aim was to explore the effect of a regular maternal meal on fetal liver blood flow at two timepoints during the third trimester, representing the start and towards the end of the fetal fat accretion period. We also sought to explore the influence of prepregancy body mass index on how the maternal meal affects fetal liver blood flow. Using ultrasound Doppler, we examined 108 healthy women with singleton pregnancies in gestational weeks 30 and 36. At each visit, the first examination was performed with the participant in a fasting state at 08.30 a.m., followed by a standard breakfast meal of approximately 400 kcal. The examination was repeated after 105 minutes. Umbilical vein and ductus venosus blood flow was estimated from diameter and blood flow velocity measurements. Fetal liver flow was calculated as umbilical vein flow minus ductus venosus flow, and change in liver blood flow as flow after minus before the meal. The total group was divided into a normal-weight group (prepregancy body mass index 18.5-25.0 kg/m2; n = 83) and an overweight group (prepregancy body mass index >25.0 kg/m2; n = 21). Four women with prepregancy body mass index <18.5 kg/m2 were excluded from these analyses. Non-parametric statistical hypothesis tests were used for group comparisons. For the total group, we observed a significant increase in median (10th - 90th percentile) liver flow 28.9 (‒67.9-111.6) ml/min (p = 0.002) following the meal in week 36, but not in week 30, ‒2.63 (‒53.2-65.0) ml/min (p = 0.91). This result in turn yielded a statistically significant increase in delta liver flow from weeks 30 to 36 of 26.0 (‒107.1-146.6) ml/min (p = 0.008). The increase in postprandial liver flow was observed only in the normal-weight group in week 36. Accordingly, the delta liver flow values between the two weight groups were significantly different in week 36 (p = 0.006) but not in week 30 (p = 0.155). Among the normal-weight women, the increase in delta liver blood flow from weeks 30 to 36 was 39.3 (‒83.0-156.1) ml/min (p<0.001); in contrast, we observed no statistically significant change in the overweight group (‒44.5 (‒229.0-123.2) ml/min; p = 0.073). As a substitute for liver size, we divided the delta liver flow values by abdominal circumference and found no changes in the statistical significance results within or between the two weight groups. In our healthy study population, we observed a statistically significant difference in liver blood flow after maternal intake of a regular meal. This effect depended on gestational age and maternal prepregancy body mass index, but apparently was independent of liver size, based on abdominal circumference as a proxy measure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31188835
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216176
pii: PONE-D-19-02138
pmc: PMC6561550
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0216176Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39324
pubmed: 22723995
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1987;24(3):145-50
pubmed: 3319816
J Nutr. 2003 May;133(5 Suppl 2):1674S-1683S
pubmed: 12730484
Placenta. 2002 Apr;23 Suppl A:S153-8
pubmed: 11978076
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;38(3):303-8
pubmed: 21557374
Circ Res. 2005 Jan 7;96(1):12-4
pubmed: 15576647
Front Horm Res. 2008;36:61-72
pubmed: 18230894
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;30(3):287-96
pubmed: 17721916
J Hepatol. 2017 Jan;66(1):212-227
pubmed: 27423426
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Aug 1;133(3):176-82
pubmed: 10906831
Hepatol Res. 2017 Feb;47(2):160-165
pubmed: 27272272
Exp Physiol. 1997 May;82(3):423-52
pubmed: 9179565
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Aug;127(2):172-85
pubmed: 16289532
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;204(5):429.e1-7
pubmed: 21354546
Hypertension. 2000 Nov;36(5):790-4
pubmed: 11082144
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):204.e1-204.e8
pubmed: 28433734
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jan;182(1 Pt 1):147-53
pubmed: 10649170
J Clin Invest. 1997 Dec 1;100(11):2923-30
pubmed: 9389760
Lancet. 1986 May 10;1(8489):1077-81
pubmed: 2871345
Lancet. 2009 May 9;373(9675):1654-7
pubmed: 19427960
J Nutr. 2010 Mar;140(3):648-52
pubmed: 20107145
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Mar 1;104(3):873-882
pubmed: 30339207
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;11(6):419-25
pubmed: 9674089
Med Eng Phys. 2003 Apr;25(3):229-38
pubmed: 12589721
Placenta. 2001 Jan;22(1):24-31
pubmed: 11162349
BMJ. 1995 Mar 18;310(6981):703-4
pubmed: 7711538
Development. 2015 Jun 15;142(12):2094-108
pubmed: 26081571
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;36(6):718-23
pubmed: 20521237
J Physiol. 2018 Dec;596(23):5823-5837
pubmed: 29516496
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;183(3):689-96
pubmed: 10992194
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jun 8;96(12):7088-92
pubmed: 10359843
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Aug;93(8):778-85
pubmed: 24806823
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998 Nov;24(9):1301-6
pubmed: 10385952
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;27(4):452-61
pubmed: 16565980
J Public Health Med. 1991 May;13(2):64-8
pubmed: 1854527
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41759
pubmed: 22927915