Exome sequencing in routine diagnostics: a generic test for 254 patients with primary immunodeficiencies.
Exome sequencing
Genetic diagnosis
Primary immunodeficiencies
Routine diagnostics
Journal
Genome medicine
ISSN: 1756-994X
Titre abrégé: Genome Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101475844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 06 2019
17 06 2019
Historique:
received:
10
01
2019
accepted:
17
05
2019
entrez:
18
6
2019
pubmed:
18
6
2019
medline:
28
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diagnosis of primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) is complex and cumbersome yet important for the clinical management of the disease. Exome sequencing may provide a genetic diagnosis in a significant number of patients in a single genetic test. In May 2013, we implemented exome sequencing in routine diagnostics for patients suffering from PIDs. This study reports the clinical utility and diagnostic yield for a heterogeneous group of 254 consecutively referred PID patients from 249 families. For the majority of patients, the clinical diagnosis was based on clinical criteria including rare and/or unusual severe bacterial, viral, or fungal infections, sometimes accompanied by autoimmune manifestations. Functional immune defects were interpreted in the context of aberrant immune cell populations, aberrant antibody levels, or combinations of these factors. For 62 patients (24%), exome sequencing identified pathogenic variants in well-established PID genes. An exome-wide analysis diagnosed 10 additional patients (4%), providing diagnoses for 72 patients (28%) from 68 families altogether. The genetic diagnosis directly indicated novel treatment options for 25 patients that received a diagnosis (34%). Exome sequencing as a first-tier test for PIDs granted a diagnosis for 28% of patients. Importantly, molecularly defined diagnoses indicated altered therapeutic options in 34% of cases. In addition, exome sequencing harbors advantages over gene panels as a truly generic test for all genetic diseases, including in silico extension of existing gene lists and re-analysis of existing data.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Diagnosis of primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) is complex and cumbersome yet important for the clinical management of the disease. Exome sequencing may provide a genetic diagnosis in a significant number of patients in a single genetic test.
METHODS
In May 2013, we implemented exome sequencing in routine diagnostics for patients suffering from PIDs. This study reports the clinical utility and diagnostic yield for a heterogeneous group of 254 consecutively referred PID patients from 249 families. For the majority of patients, the clinical diagnosis was based on clinical criteria including rare and/or unusual severe bacterial, viral, or fungal infections, sometimes accompanied by autoimmune manifestations. Functional immune defects were interpreted in the context of aberrant immune cell populations, aberrant antibody levels, or combinations of these factors.
RESULTS
For 62 patients (24%), exome sequencing identified pathogenic variants in well-established PID genes. An exome-wide analysis diagnosed 10 additional patients (4%), providing diagnoses for 72 patients (28%) from 68 families altogether. The genetic diagnosis directly indicated novel treatment options for 25 patients that received a diagnosis (34%).
CONCLUSION
Exome sequencing as a first-tier test for PIDs granted a diagnosis for 28% of patients. Importantly, molecularly defined diagnoses indicated altered therapeutic options in 34% of cases. In addition, exome sequencing harbors advantages over gene panels as a truly generic test for all genetic diseases, including in silico extension of existing gene lists and re-analysis of existing data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31203817
doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0649-3
pii: 10.1186/s13073-019-0649-3
pmc: PMC6572765
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
38Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 310372
Pays : International
Références
Nat Genet. 2017 Aug;49(8):1192-1201
pubmed: 28628108
J Clin Immunol. 2017 Apr;37(3):273-276
pubmed: 28265964
Curr Opin Immunol. 2015 Feb;32:90-105
pubmed: 25645939
J Intern Med. 2015 Aug;278(2):203-10
pubmed: 25639832
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Sep 1;39(5):692-9
pubmed: 15356785
Haematologica. 2010 Feb;95(2):333-7
pubmed: 19679886
Blood. 2011 Sep 8;118(10):2653-5
pubmed: 21670465
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Feb 28;45(4):1633-1648
pubmed: 27980096
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Oct;138(4):1142-1151.e2
pubmed: 27484032
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):60-71
pubmed: 29298156
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 1;26(5):589-95
pubmed: 20080505
Blood. 2016 Jul 21;128(3):440-8
pubmed: 27216217
Clin Exp Immunol. 1998 Dec;114(3):327-9
pubmed: 9844038
Front Immunol. 2016 Jun 13;7:220
pubmed: 27379089
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 May;139(5):1629-1640.e2
pubmed: 28139313
Hum Mutat. 2013 Dec;34(12):1721-6
pubmed: 24123792
J Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;38(1):129-143
pubmed: 29226301
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Sep;142(3):904-913.e3
pubmed: 29355678
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):314-23
pubmed: 23374262
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D863-7
pubmed: 18842635
Blood. 2011 Nov 10;118(19):5108-18
pubmed: 21908431
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 31;371(5):434-46
pubmed: 25075835
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;139(1):232-245
pubmed: 27577878
Nature. 2016 Aug 17;536(7616):285-91
pubmed: 27535533
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;69(8):1689-1700
pubmed: 28493328
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb;133(2):529-34
pubmed: 24139496
Front Immunol. 2014 Nov 03;5:531
pubmed: 25404929
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Jun;24(6):1250-1259
pubmed: 29412158
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 5;376(1):21-31
pubmed: 27959697
Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Feb 11;88(2):216-25
pubmed: 21310276
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Sep;138(3):895-898
pubmed: 27132219
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 11;9(12):e114901
pubmed: 25502423
Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 1;32(19):3018-20
pubmed: 27288501
Nature. 2014 Jun 12;510(7504):235-240
pubmed: 24870228
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Feb;141(2):704-717.e5
pubmed: 28601685
Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):e1341-4
pubmed: 17908720
Front Immunol. 2017 Jun 30;8:773
pubmed: 28713390
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015 Jun;40(4):367-72
pubmed: 25683018
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Feb;84(2):197-209
pubmed: 19200523
Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Aug;34(8):973-7
pubmed: 1859491
Genome Res. 2012 Aug;22(8):1525-32
pubmed: 22585873
Science. 2015 Jul 24;349(6246):436-40
pubmed: 26206937
Thyroid. 2009 Jun;19(6):559-63
pubmed: 19445623
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 15;367(20):1921-9
pubmed: 23033978
Annu Rev Genet. 2013;47:139-65
pubmed: 24274751
J Exp Med. 2015 Jul 27;212(8):1185-202
pubmed: 26150473
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Nov - Dec;6(6):2165-2167
pubmed: 29510232
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 7;365(1):54-61
pubmed: 21714643
Pediatr Transplant. 2013 Dec;17(8):820-5
pubmed: 24164830
J Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;38(1):96-128
pubmed: 29226302
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Jun;137(6):1780-1787
pubmed: 26915675
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Sep;19(9):1194-6
pubmed: 27479843
Immunity. 2010 Sep 24;33(3):400-11
pubmed: 20832341
Genet Med. 2017 Jun;19(6):667-675
pubmed: 28574513
Blood. 2008 Jan 1;111(1):439-45
pubmed: 17901250
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Mar 26;14:166
pubmed: 24669841