Persuasive design features within a consumer-focused eHealth intervention integrated with the electronic health record: A mixed methods study of effectiveness and acceptability.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
12
2018
accepted:
03
06
2019
entrez:
21
6
2019
pubmed:
21
6
2019
medline:
14
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
eHealth strategies targeting health-related behaviour often incorporate persuasive software design. To further engage patients with their overall health management, consumer-facing web portals may be integrated with data from one or more care providers. This study aimed to explore effectiveness for healthier behaviour of persuasive design characteristics within a web application integrated with the primary health care electronic record; also patient and general practitioner (GP) preferences for future integrated records. Mixed methods study within the Consumer Navigation of Electronic Cardiovascular Tools randomised controlled trial. Participants were patients with moderate-high risk of cardiovascular disease, and their GPs. Survey and web analytic data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Interview and focus group transcripts were recorded, transcribed, coded and analysed for themes. Surveys (n = 397) received from patients indicated improved medication adherence (31.8%); improved mental health and well-being (40%); higher physical activity (47%); and healthier eating (61%). Users of the interactive features reported benefiting from personalised cardiovascular disease risk score (73%); goal tracking (69%); risk factor self-monitoring (52%) and receipt of motivational health tips (54%). Focus group and interview participants (n = 55) described customisations that would increase portal appeal and relevance, including more provider interaction. Of the GP survey respondents (n = 38), 74% reported increased patient attendance and engagement with their care. For future integrated portals, 94% of GPs were in favour and key themes among interviewees (n = 17) related to design optimisation, impact on workflow and data security. Intervention features reflecting the persuasive design categories of Primary Task support, Dialogue support and System Credibility support facilitated healthier lifestyle behaviour. Patients valued customisable functions and greater patient-provider interactivity. GPs identified system challenges but saw advantages for patients and the health care relationship. Future studies could further elucidate the persuasive design principles that are at play and which may promote adoption of EHR-integrated consumer portals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31220127
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218447
pii: PONE-D-18-36315
pmc: PMC6586306
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0218447Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148
pubmed: 26104044
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):445
pubmed: 29898730
J Med Syst. 2016 Mar;40(3):72
pubmed: 26748792
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 22;6:CD012675
pubmed: 29932455
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Mar;65(632):e141-51
pubmed: 25733435
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):707-13
pubmed: 24650635
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 May;24(4):303-316
pubmed: 28350282
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 01;20(11):e278
pubmed: 30389647
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):534
pubmed: 28784173
JAMA. 2015 Sep 22-29;314(12):1255-63
pubmed: 26393848
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Aug;84:82-92
pubmed: 29936091
BMJ. 2010 Nov 16;341:c5814
pubmed: 21081595
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Nov 24;11:73
pubmed: 22115059
Circulation. 2009 Mar 17;119(10):1442-52
pubmed: 19289649
Health Technol (Berl). 2016 Jul;6(2):89-99
pubmed: 35757564
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2014 Sep-Oct;34(5):303-17
pubmed: 25079147
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 11;7(1):e014353
pubmed: 28077414
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 11;18(4):e78
pubmed: 27068880
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):171-8
pubmed: 19074300
BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6
pubmed: 16484270
J Oncol Pract. 2011 Jul;7(4):230-3
pubmed: 22043186
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:75-80
pubmed: 28186019
Ageing Res Rev. 2011 Sep;10(4):487-97
pubmed: 21628005
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Apr 01;12:1c
pubmed: 26755897
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 20;19(4):e124
pubmed: 28428155
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Sep 09;16:119
pubmed: 26354752
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 18;15:32
pubmed: 25927384
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Oct 06;8:45
pubmed: 18837999
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 29;4:CD011851
pubmed: 28455948
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Dec;96:71-85
pubmed: 27117057
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 06;20(7):e235
pubmed: 29980499
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jul 22;13(3):e46
pubmed: 21795238
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):277-95
pubmed: 25207647
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jul 01;24(4):857-866
pubmed: 28158573
BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 30;3(7):
pubmed: 23901027
Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):1124-39
pubmed: 24364414
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 31;4(2):e004523
pubmed: 24486732
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):120
pubmed: 27630020
Inform Prim Care. 2012;20(3):151-69
pubmed: 23710840
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:39-44
pubmed: 22797017
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 11;16(3):e77
pubmed: 24618349
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Dec;96:24-37
pubmed: 26847070
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 27;15(3):e65
pubmed: 23535584