Distinct leaf transcriptomic response of water deficient Eucalyptus grandis submitted to potassium and sodium fertilization.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
12
2018
accepted:
04
06
2019
entrez:
21
6
2019
pubmed:
21
6
2019
medline:
13
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While potassium fertilization increases growth yield in Brazilian eucalyptus plantations, it could also increase water requirements, making trees more vulnerable to drought. Sodium fertilization, which has been shown to promote eucalyptus growth compared to K-deficient trees, could partially mitigate this adverse effect of potassium. However, little is known about the influence of K and Na fertilization on the tree metabolic response to water deficit. The aim of the present study was thus to analyze the transcriptome of leaves sampled from Eucalyptus grandis trees subjected to 37% rainfall reduction, and fertilized with potassium (K), sodium (Na), compared to control trees (C). The multifactorial experiment was set up in a field with a throughfall exclusion system. Transcriptomic analysis was performed on leaves from two-year-old trees, and data analyzed using multifactorial statistical analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Significant sets of genes were seen to respond to rainfall reduction, in interaction with K or Na fertilization, or to fertilization only (regardless of the water supply regime). The genes were involved in stress signaling, primary and secondary metabolism, secondary cell wall formation and photosynthetic activity. Our focus on key genes related to cation transporters and aquaporins highlighted specific regulation of ion homeostasis, and plant adjustment to water deficit. While water availability significantly affects the transcriptomic response of eucalyptus species, this study points out that the transcriptomic response is highly dependent on the fertilization regime. Our study is based on the first large-scale field trial in a tropical region, specifically designed to study the interaction between water availability and nutrition in eucalyptus. To our knowledge, this is the first global transcriptomic analysis to compare the influence of K and Na fertilization on tree adaptive traits in water deficit conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31220144
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218528
pii: PONE-D-18-36234
pmc: PMC6586347
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fertilizers
0
Soil
0
Sodium
9NEZ333N27
Potassium
RWP5GA015D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0218528Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Trends Plant Sci. 2004 May;9(5):244-52
pubmed: 15130550
Plant Cell Physiol. 2001 Jul;42(7):686-93
pubmed: 11479374
Plant Physiol. 2010 Jun;153(2):863-75
pubmed: 20413648
New Phytol. 2008;179(4):911-929
pubmed: 18537893
Plant Cell Environ. 2014 Jan;37(1):70-81
pubmed: 23663049
Plant Cell. 2005 Dec;17(12):3470-88
pubmed: 16284313
Int J Plant Genomics. 2008;2008:619832
pubmed: 18483572
Plants (Basel). 2015 Feb 16;4(1):112-66
pubmed: 27135320
New Phytol. 2007;175(3):387-404
pubmed: 17635215
Plant Mol Biol. 2014 Oct;86(3):335-50
pubmed: 25082269
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Apr 22;5:151
pubmed: 24795738
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1488:75-120
pubmed: 27933521
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(2):425-36
pubmed: 16364949
J Plant Physiol. 2014 May 15;171(9):670-87
pubmed: 24635902
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Jun;8(3):308-16
pubmed: 15860428
Plant Signal Behav. 2016;11(1):e1117723
pubmed: 26636625
J Proteomics. 2017 Oct 3;169:233-238
pubmed: 28412527
Plant J. 2002 Dec;32(5):799-808
pubmed: 12472694
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):4976-7
pubmed: 12704226
Curr Biol. 2006 May 9;16(9):882-7
pubmed: 16682349
Plant Physiol. 2003 Dec;133(4):1702-16
pubmed: 14681533
J Plant Nutr. 1999;22(11):1745-61
pubmed: 11542657
Bioinformatics. 2010 Sep 15;26(18):2347-8
pubmed: 20656902
Planta. 2007 Aug;226(3):671-81
pubmed: 17447082
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Sep 16;5:467
pubmed: 25278946
J Biol Chem. 2000 Jan 21;275(3):1723-30
pubmed: 10636868
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 May 30;17(1):94
pubmed: 28558655
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Nat Protoc. 2012 Mar 01;7(3):562-78
pubmed: 22383036
Plants (Basel). 2017 May 25;6(2):
pubmed: 28587097
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39856
pubmed: 22792192
Physiol Plant. 2014 Jul;151(3):257-79
pubmed: 24506225
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5549-54
pubmed: 12671068
Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep;136(1):2532-47
pubmed: 15347787
J Exp Bot. 2016 Apr;67(9):2689-98
pubmed: 26969743
J Plant Res. 2017 Nov;130(6):1079-1093
pubmed: 28711996
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 17;8(4):e61505
pubmed: 23613865
Plant Physiol. 2004 Mar;134(3):1135-45
pubmed: 14988478
J Exp Bot. 2014 Oct;65(19):5535-56
pubmed: 25114014
Plant Physiol. 2005 Oct;139(2):790-805
pubmed: 16183846
Tree Physiol. 2014 Oct;34(10):1102-17
pubmed: 25281842
Science. 2001 May 25;292(5521):1486-7
pubmed: 11379626
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006 Jul-Sep;44(7-9):494-505
pubmed: 17027276
Plant Cell. 2011 Sep;23(9):3482-97
pubmed: 21954467
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 May 23;16(1):118
pubmed: 27215785
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):107
pubmed: 28629324
Plant Signal Behav. 2016;11(2):e1085275
pubmed: 26431457
Ann Bot. 2009 Feb;103(4):551-60
pubmed: 18662937
Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Aug;6(8):1201-4
pubmed: 21757998
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014 Mar;76:86-93
pubmed: 24486583
Plant Physiol. 2001 Aug;126(4):1646-67
pubmed: 11500563
FEBS Lett. 2005 Oct 24;579(25):5814-20
pubmed: 16223486
C R Biol. 2009 Sep;332(9):784-94
pubmed: 19748453
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Dec 11;17(1):240
pubmed: 29228924
F1000Res. 2014 Jul 01;3:141
pubmed: 25075306
Front Physiol. 2017 Jul 18;8:509
pubmed: 28769821
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 May 31;14:150
pubmed: 24884528
J Plant Nutr. 2000;23(10):1449-70
pubmed: 11594364
Plant Physiol. 2005 Aug;138(4):2048-60
pubmed: 16055687
Plant Physiol. 1998 Oct;118(2):651-9
pubmed: 9765551
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651-81
pubmed: 18444910
Plant J. 2009 May;58(4):578-91
pubmed: 19175769
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Nov 3;13(11):e1005752
pubmed: 29099853
Tree Physiol. 2004 Mar;24(3):265-76
pubmed: 14704136
Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jul;43(4):515-25
pubmed: 11052203
J Plant Physiol. 2017 Aug;215:30-38
pubmed: 28527336
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Mar;52:169-78
pubmed: 22285371
Ann Bot. 2003 Nov;92(5):627-34
pubmed: 14500326
Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106
pubmed: 20979621
Tree Physiol. 2009 Jan;29(1):111-24
pubmed: 19203937
Plant Physiol. 2013 Oct;163(2):611-24
pubmed: 24027242
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Dec 04;5:687
pubmed: 25538721
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2017 Aug;35(11):2454-2474
pubmed: 27632363
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Jun;115:183-199
pubmed: 28376411
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jun;47:185-214
pubmed: 15012287
Plant Physiol. 2009 Dec;151(4):1918-29
pubmed: 19819982
J Exp Bot. 2002 Feb;53(367):241-50
pubmed: 11807128
F1000Res. 2016 Jul 15;5:1717
pubmed: 27830058
New Phytol. 2002 Mar;153(3):509-515
pubmed: 33863213
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e69737
pubmed: 23874992
Bioinformatics. 2005 Aug 15;21(16):3448-9
pubmed: 15972284
Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Feb;10(2):88-94
pubmed: 15708346
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e70321
pubmed: 23922980
Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):275-294
pubmed: 11841670
DNA Res. 2015 Dec;22(6):471-83
pubmed: 26546226
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-13
pubmed: 19033363
Plant Cell. 2007 Mar;19(3):890-903
pubmed: 17351116
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 08;8:991
pubmed: 28642785
BMC Genomics. 2012 Aug 01;13:364
pubmed: 22853646
Plant Physiol. 2007 Feb;143(2):876-92
pubmed: 17158588
Plant J. 2010 Feb;61(4):650-60
pubmed: 19947979
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 9;114(19):5047-5052
pubmed: 28439024
Physiol Plant. 2012 Nov;146(3):350-62
pubmed: 22443491
Plant J. 2014 May;78(4):646-58
pubmed: 24617758
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:451-76
pubmed: 23330792
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 29;9:559
pubmed: 19114008
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 19;104(25):10726-31
pubmed: 17563365
Plant Cell. 2013 Feb;25(2):609-24
pubmed: 23396830
Tree Physiol. 2012 Jun;32(6):667-79
pubmed: 22021011
Nature. 2000 Feb 10;403(6770):601-3
pubmed: 10688178
BMC Plant Biol. 2009 Nov 27;9:140
pubmed: 19943938
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154330
pubmed: 27104786
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 04;9(12):e111152
pubmed: 25474740
J Plant Physiol. 2011 Jun 15;168(9):903-10
pubmed: 21367483
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1066-82
pubmed: 12082126
J Membr Biol. 2006 Mar;210(2):131-42
pubmed: 16868673
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(11):2971-85
pubmed: 19542196
Curr Biol. 2015 Dec 7;25(23):3119-25
pubmed: 26752079
Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep;136(1):2556-76
pubmed: 15347784
Plant J. 2005 Jul;43(2):273-83
pubmed: 15998313
Front Genet. 2015 Jul 30;6:256
pubmed: 26284112
Plant J. 2003 Sep;35(6):675-92
pubmed: 12969422
Plant Cell. 2012 Mar;24(3):1127-42
pubmed: 22438021
J Exp Bot. 2013 Jan;64(2):391-403
pubmed: 23255280
Plant Physiol. 2014 Apr;164(4):1600-18
pubmed: 24449709
J Plant Physiol. 2014 May 15;171(9):656-69
pubmed: 24140002
New Phytol. 2014 Jul;203(2):401-413
pubmed: 24725318
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):422-6
pubmed: 23969459
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jul 29;17(8):
pubmed: 27483251
Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(7):1507-15
pubmed: 17905722
Plant Physiol. 2002 May;129(1):290-9
pubmed: 12011359
J Plant Physiol. 2016 Sep 1;202:1-9
pubmed: 27450489