Characteristics of Health Care Organizations Associated With Clinician Trust: Results From the Healthy Work Place Study.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 06 2019
Historique:
entrez: 22 6 2019
pubmed: 22 6 2019
medline: 19 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is new emphasis on clinician trust in health care organizations but little empirical data about the association of trust with clinician satisfaction and retention. To examine organizational characteristics associated with trust. This prospective cohort study uses data collected from 2012 to 2014 from 34 primary care practices employing physicians (family medicine and general internal medicine) and advanced practice clinicians (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) in the upper Midwest and East Coast of the United States as part of the Healthy Work Place randomized clinical trial. Analyses were performed from 2015 to 2016. Clinician trust was measured using a 5-item scale, including belonging, loyalty, safety focus, sense of trust, and responsibility to clinicians in need (range, 1-4, with 1 indicating low and 4 indicating high; Cronbach α = 0.77). Other metrics included work control, work atmosphere (calm to chaotic), organizational culture (cohesiveness, emphases on quality and communication, and values alignment; range, 1-4, with 1 indicating low and 4 indicating high), and clinician stress (range, 1-5, with 1 indicating low and 5 indicating high), satisfaction (range, 1-5, with 1 indicating low and 4 indicating high), burnout (range, 1-5, with 1 indicating no burnout and 5 indicating very high feeling of burnout), and intention to leave (range, 1-5, with 1 indicating no intention to leave and 5 indicating definite intention to leave). Analyses included 2-level hierarchical modeling controlling for age, sex, specialty, and clinician type. Cohen d effect sizes (ESs) were considered small at 0.20, moderate at 0.50, and large at 0.80 or more. The study included 165 clinicians (mean [SD] age, 47.3 [9.2] years; 86 [52.1%] women). Of these, 143 (87.7%) were physicians and 22 (13.3%) were advanced practice clinicians; 105 clinicians (63.6%) worked in family medicine, and 60 clinicians (36.4%) worked in internal medicine. Compared with clinicians with low levels of trust, clinicians who reported high levels of trust had higher mean (SD) scores for work control (2.49 [0.52] vs 2.18 [0.45]; P < .001), cohesiveness (3.11 [0.46] vs 2.51 [0.51]; P < .001), emphasis on quality vs productivity (3.12 [0.48] vs 2.58 [0.41]; P < .001), emphasis on communication (3.39 [0.41] vs 3.01 [0.44]; P < .001), and values alignment (2.61 [0.59] vs 2.12 [0.52]; P < .001). Men were more likely than women to express loyalty (ES, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.05-0.66; P = .02) and high trust (ES, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.01-0.62; P = .04). Compared with clinicians with low trust at baseline, clinicians with high trust at baseline had a higher mean (SD) satisfaction score (3.99 [0.08] vs 3.51 [0.07]; P < .001; ES, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.39-1.02). Compared with clinicians in whom trust declined or remained low, clinicians with improved or stable high trust reported higher mean (SD) satisfaction (4.01 [0.07] vs 3.43 [0.06]; P < .001; ES, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31) and lower stress (3.21 [0.09] vs 3.53 [0.09]; P = .02; ES, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.08) scores and had approximately half the odds of intending to leave (odds ratio, 0.481; 95% CI, 0.241-0.957; P = .04). Addressing low levels of trust by improving work control and emphasizing quality, cohesion, communication, and values may improve clinician satisfaction, stress, and retention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31225894
pii: 2736178
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6201
pmc: PMC6593631
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e196201

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1317-1331
pubmed: 30193239
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2001 Oct;26(5):851-83
pubmed: 11765268
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1294-304
pubmed: 27400435
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 25;378(4):309-311
pubmed: 29365301
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150
pubmed: 30326495
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jun;15(6):372-80
pubmed: 10886471
J Fam Pract. 1998 Sep;47(3):213-20
pubmed: 9752374
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1105-11
pubmed: 25724571
Acad Med. 2019 Apr;94(4):463-465
pubmed: 30649020
J Nurs Adm. 2000 Sep;30(9):413-25
pubmed: 11006783
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1139-1149
pubmed: 30183495
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 May;26(5):413-419
pubmed: 28437214
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):394-8
pubmed: 14645329
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Oct 1;36(10):1808-1814
pubmed: 28971927
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 5;372(10):897-9
pubmed: 25622024
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 7;151(1):28-36, W6-9
pubmed: 19581644
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 25;378(4):312-314
pubmed: 29365296
Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2272-2281
pubmed: 27692469
JAMA. 2015 Sep 15;314(11):1149-58
pubmed: 26372584
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2419-2420
pubmed: 30476944
Med Care. 1996 May;34(5):377-88
pubmed: 8614161
Acad Med. 2009 Jan;84(1):32-6
pubmed: 19116474
Am J Med Qual. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):56-66
pubmed: 15115276
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1826-1832
pubmed: 28973070
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Feb;13(1):56-61
pubmed: 14757801
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1331-1332
pubmed: 30193370
Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):121-43
pubmed: 11949917
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1498-1507
pubmed: 30242346

Auteurs

Mark Linzer (M)

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Sara Poplau (S)

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Kriti Prasad (K)

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Dhruv Khullar (D)

Cornell University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Roger Brown (R)

University of Wisconsin School of Nursing, Madison.

Anita Varkey (A)

Loyola University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Steven Yale (S)

University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Lake Nona, Orlando.

Ellie Grossman (E)

Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Eric Williams (E)

Culverhouse College of Business, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

Christine Sinsky (C)

American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH