Segment-averaged LET concept and analytical calculation from microdosimetric quantities in proton radiation therapy.
LET calculation
analytical LET
microdosimetry
particle therapy
proton therapy
segment-averaged LET
Journal
Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
08
03
2019
revised:
10
05
2019
accepted:
13
06
2019
pubmed:
23
6
2019
medline:
28
1
2020
entrez:
23
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This work introduces the concept of segment-averaged linear energy transfer (LET) as a new approach to average distributions of LET of proton beams based on a revisiting of microdosimetry theory. The concept of segment-averaged LET is then used to generate an analytical model from Monte Carlo simulations data to perform fast and accurate calculations of LET distributions for proton beams. The distribution of energy imparted by a proton beam into a representative biological structure or site is influenced by the distributions of (a) LET, (b) segment length, which is the section of the proton track in the site, and (c) energy straggling of the proton beam. The distribution of LET is thus generated by the LET of each component of the beam in the site. However, the situation when the LET of each single proton varies appreciably along its path in the site is not defined. Therefore, a new distribution can be obtained if the particle track segment is decomposed into smaller portions in which LET is roughly constant. We have called "segment distribution" of LET the one generated by the contribution of each portion. The average of that distribution is called segment-averaged LET. This quantity is obtained in the microdosimetry theory from the average and standard deviation of the distributions of energy imparted to the site, segment length, and energy imparted per collision. All this information is calculated for protons of clinically relevant energies by means of Geant4-DNA microdosimetric simulations. Finally, a set of analytical functions is proposed for each one of the previous quantities. The presented model functions are fitted to data from Geant4-DNA simulations for monoenergetic beams from 100 keV to 100 MeV and for spherical sites of 1, 5, and 10 μm in diameter. The average differences along the considered energy range between calculations based on our analytical models and MC for segment-averaged dose-averaged restricted LET are -0.2 ± 0.7 keV/μm for the 1 μm case, 0.0 ± 0.9 keV/μm for the 5 μm case, and -0.3 ± 1.1 keV/μm for the 10 μm case, respectively. All average differences are below the average standard deviation (1σ) of the MC calculations. A new way of averaging LET for a proton beam is performed to incorporate the effects produced by the variation of stopping power of each individual proton along microscopic biological structures. An analytical model based on MC simulations allows for fast and accurate calculations of segment-averaged dose-averaged restricted LET for proton beams, which otherwise would need to be calculated from exhaustive MC simulations of clinical plans.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4204-4214Subventions
Organisme : Varian Medical Systems
Organisme : European Union's Horizon 2020
ID : 675265
Organisme : Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
ID : FPA2016-77689-C2-1-R
Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Grassberger C, Paganetti H. Elevated LET components in clinical proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:6677-6691.
Paganetti H. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:R419-R472.
Belli M, Cera F, Cherubini R, et al. RBE-LET relationships for cell inactivation and mutation induced by low energy protons in V79 cells: Further results at the LNL facility. Int J Radiat Biol. 1998;74:501-509.
Peeler CR, Mirkovic D, Titt U, et al. Clinical evidence of variable proton biological effectiveness in pediatric patients treated for ependymoma. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121:395-401.
Grün R, Friedrich T, Traneus E, Scholz M. Is the dose-averaged LET a reliable predictor for the relative biological effectiveness? Med Phys. 2018;46:1064-1074.
Fager M, Toma-Dasu I, Kirk M, et al. Linear energy transfer painting with proton therapy: a means of reducing radiation doses with equivalent clinical effectiveness. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2015;91:1057-1064.
Unkelbach J, Botas P, Giantsoudi D, Gorissen BL, Paganetti H. Reoptimization of intensity modulated proton therapy plans based on linear energy transfer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:1097-1106.
Rossi HH, Zaider M. Microdosimetry and Its Applications. Berlin: Springer; 1996.
Kellerer AM. Fundamentals of microdosimetry. In: Kase KR, Bjarngard BE, Attix FH, eds. The Dosimetry of Ionization Radiation. Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press Inc; 1985:77-162.
Lindborg L, Waker A. Microdosimetry. Experimental Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2017.
Kellerer AM, Chmelevsky D. Criteria for the applicability of LET. Radiat Res. 1975;63:226-234.
Wilkens JJ, Oelfke U. Analytical linear energy transfer calculations for proton therapy. Med Phys. 2003;30:806-815.
Wilkens JJ, Oelfke U. Three-dimensional LET calculations for treatment planning of proton therapy. Z Med Phys. 2004;14:41-46.
Sanchez-Parcerisa D, Cortés-Giraldo MA, Dolney D, Kondrla M, Fager M, Carabe A. Analytical calculation of proton linear energy transfer in voxelized geometries including secondary protons. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:1705-1721.
Marsolat F, De Marzi L, Pouzoulet F, Mazal A. Analytical linear energy transfer model including secondary particles: calculations along the central axis of the proton pencil beam. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:740-757.
Xapsos MA. A spatially restricted linear energy transfer equation. Radiat Res. 1992;132:282-287.
Chen J, Kellerer AM, Rossi HH. Radially restricted linear energy transfer for high-energy protons: a new analytical approach. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1994;33:181-187.
Cucinotta FA, Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT. Model for radial dependence of frequency distributions for energy imparted in nanometer volumes from HZE particles model for radial dependence of frequency distributions for energy imparted in nanometer volumes from HZE particles. Radiat Res. 2000;153:459-468.
Bertolet A, Baratto-Roldán A, Barbieri S, Baiocco G, Carabe A, Cortés-Giraldo MA. Dose-averaged LET calculation for proton track segments using microdosimetric Monte Carlo simulations. Med Phys. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13643
Rossi HH. Interpretation of biological response in terms of microdosimetry. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969;161:260-271.
ICRU. Report 36. Microdosimetry; 1983.
Hawkins RB. A Microdosimetric-kinetic model for the effect of non-poisson distribution of lethal lesions on the variation of RBE with LET. Radiat Res. 2003;160:61-69.
Newhauser WD, Zhang R. The physics of proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:R155-R209.
Kellerer A. Considerations on the random traversal of convex bodies and solutions for general cylinders. Radiat Res. 1971;47:359-376.
Kellerer AM. Microdosimetry and Theory of Straggling. In: Panel on Biophysical Aspects of Radiation Quality; 1968.
Kellerer AM. Chord-length distributions and related quantities for spheroids. Radiat Res. 1984;98:425-437.
Incerti S, Baldacchino G, Bernal M, et al. The Geant4-DNA project. Int J Model Simulation Sci Comput. 2010;1:157.
Incerti S, Ivanchenko A, Karamitros M, et al. Comparison of GEANT4 very low energy cross section models with experimental data in water. Med Phys. 2010;37:4692-4708.
Bernal MAA, Bordage MCC, Brown JMCMC, et al. Track structure modeling in liquid water: a review of the Geant4-DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. Phys Med. 2015;31:861-874.
Incerti S, Kyriakou I, Bernal MA, et al. Geant4-DNA example applications for track structure simulations in liquid water: a report from the Geant4-DNA Project. Med Phys. 2018;45:e722-e739.
Bethe H. Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie. Ann Phys. 1930;397:325-400.
ICRU Report 73. Stopping of ions heavier than Helium. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas. 2005;5:iii-viii.
Santa Cruz GA, Palmer MR, Matatagui E, Zamenhof RG. A theoretical model for event statistics in microdosimetry. I: uniform distribution of heavy ion tracks. Med Phys. 2001;28:988-996.
Ulmer W, Matsinos E. Theoretical methods for the calculation of Bragg curves and 3D distributions of proton beams. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2010;190:1-81.
Berger MJ, Coursey JS, Zucker MA, Chang J.Stopping-Power; Range Tables for Electrons, Protons, and Helium Ions | NIST. NIST Standard Reference Database 124. https://www.nist.gov/pml/stopping-power-range-tables-electrons-protons-and-helium-ions. Published 2017. Accessed December 19, 2018.
Inc The MathWorks. Matlab R2018a and Curve Fitting toolbox; 2018.