Diagnostic Yield of Next Generation Sequencing in Genetically Undiagnosed Patients with Primary Immunodeficiencies: a Systematic Review.

Primary immunodeficiency (PID) clinical performance diagnostic yield next generation sequencing (NGS) technological performance whole exome sequencing (WES) whole genome sequencing (WGS)

Journal

Journal of clinical immunology
ISSN: 1573-2592
Titre abrégé: J Clin Immunol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8102137

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 25 01 2019
accepted: 10 06 2019
pubmed: 30 6 2019
medline: 11 7 2020
entrez: 29 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As the application of next generation sequencing (NGS) is moving to earlier stages in the diagnostic pipeline for primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), re-evaluation of its effectiveness is required. The aim of this study is to systematically review the diagnostic yield of NGS in PIDs. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible when describing the use of NGS in patients that had previously been diagnosed with PID on clinical and/or laboratory findings. Relevant data on study characteristics, technological performance and diagnostic yield were extracted. Fourteen studies were eligible for data extraction. Six studies described patient populations from specific PID subcategories. The remaining studies included patients with unsorted PIDs. The studies were based on populations from Italy, Iran, Turkey, Thailand, the Netherlands, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Eight studies used an array-based targeted gene panel, four used WES in combination with a PID filter, and two used both techniques. The mean reported reading depth ranged from 98 to 1337 times. Five studies described the sensitivity of the applied techniques, ranging from 83 to 100%, whereas specificity ranged from 45 to 99.9%. The percentage of patients who were genetically diagnosed ranged from 15 to 79%. Several studies described clinical implications of the genetic findings. NGS has the ability to contribute significantly to the identification of molecular mechanisms in PID patients. The diagnostic yield highly depends on population and on the technical circumstances under which NGS is employed. Further research is needed to determine the exact diagnostic yield and clinical implications of NGS in patients with PID.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
As the application of next generation sequencing (NGS) is moving to earlier stages in the diagnostic pipeline for primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), re-evaluation of its effectiveness is required. The aim of this study is to systematically review the diagnostic yield of NGS in PIDs.
METHODS
PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible when describing the use of NGS in patients that had previously been diagnosed with PID on clinical and/or laboratory findings. Relevant data on study characteristics, technological performance and diagnostic yield were extracted.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were eligible for data extraction. Six studies described patient populations from specific PID subcategories. The remaining studies included patients with unsorted PIDs. The studies were based on populations from Italy, Iran, Turkey, Thailand, the Netherlands, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Eight studies used an array-based targeted gene panel, four used WES in combination with a PID filter, and two used both techniques. The mean reported reading depth ranged from 98 to 1337 times. Five studies described the sensitivity of the applied techniques, ranging from 83 to 100%, whereas specificity ranged from 45 to 99.9%. The percentage of patients who were genetically diagnosed ranged from 15 to 79%. Several studies described clinical implications of the genetic findings.
DISCUSSION
NGS has the ability to contribute significantly to the identification of molecular mechanisms in PID patients. The diagnostic yield highly depends on population and on the technical circumstances under which NGS is employed. Further research is needed to determine the exact diagnostic yield and clinical implications of NGS in patients with PID.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31250335
doi: 10.1007/s10875-019-00656-x
pii: 10.1007/s10875-019-00656-x
pmc: PMC6697711
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

577-591

Références

Int J Pediatr. 2018 Apr 23;2018:3527480
pubmed: 29849668
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S297-305
pubmed: 20042230
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Oct;138(4):1142-1151.e2
pubmed: 27484032
Front Immunol. 2016 Jun 13;7:220
pubmed: 27379089
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Apr;54(2):261-268
pubmed: 29030829
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Mar;48(3):202-9
pubmed: 21564385
J Clin Immunol. 2015 May;35(4):416-30
pubmed: 25893636
Scand J Immunol. 2017 Mar;85(3):227-234
pubmed: 28109013
Front Immunol. 2016 Nov 07;7:466
pubmed: 27872624
Hum Hered. 2014;77(1-4):138-43
pubmed: 25060276
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Aug;136(2):476-9.e6
pubmed: 25981738
Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):1-6
pubmed: 12507953
Front Immunol. 2017 Jul 24;8:847
pubmed: 28791010
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 16;2018:9647253
pubmed: 29888287
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;122(6):1069-73
pubmed: 18992927
J Clin Immunol. 2018 Apr;38(3):320-329
pubmed: 29675737
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;139(1):232-245
pubmed: 27577878
Eur J Immunol. 2014 Oct;44(10):2854-61
pubmed: 25154746
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jun;94:103174
pubmed: 30965134
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb;133(2):529-34
pubmed: 24139496
Front Immunol. 2014 Nov 03;5:531
pubmed: 25404929
Clin Exp Immunol. 2018 Jun;192(3):284-291
pubmed: 29878323
J Clin Immunol. 2016 May;36 Suppl 1:68-75
pubmed: 26993986
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 11;9(12):e114901
pubmed: 25502423
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):243-251
pubmed: 29921932
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Apr;141(4):1450-1458
pubmed: 28916186
Clin Genet. 2018 Mar;93(3):647-655
pubmed: 29077208
J Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;37(1):42-50
pubmed: 27807805
Clin Exp Immunol. 2017 Jun;188(3):326-332
pubmed: 28236292
J Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;37(1):67-79
pubmed: 27747465
J Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;38(1):96-128
pubmed: 29226302
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Jun;137(6):1780-1787
pubmed: 26915675
Clin Immunol. 2015 Oct;160(2):301-14
pubmed: 26122175
Int J Hematol. 2017 Aug;106(2):282-290
pubmed: 28353193
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Oct;14(10):468
pubmed: 25149170
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Oct;138(4):957-969
pubmed: 27720020

Auteurs

Hemmo A F Yska (HAF)

Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Kim Elsink (K)

Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Taco W Kuijpers (TW)

Department of Pediatric Hematology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Geert W J Frederix (GWJ)

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Mariëlle E van Gijn (ME)

Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Joris M van Montfrans (JM)

Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. J.vanMontfrans@umcutrecht.nl.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH