Diagnostic Yield of Next Generation Sequencing in Genetically Undiagnosed Patients with Primary Immunodeficiencies: a Systematic Review.
Primary immunodeficiency (PID)
clinical performance
diagnostic yield
next generation sequencing (NGS)
technological performance
whole exome sequencing (WES)
whole genome sequencing (WGS)
Journal
Journal of clinical immunology
ISSN: 1573-2592
Titre abrégé: J Clin Immunol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8102137
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
25
01
2019
accepted:
10
06
2019
pubmed:
30
6
2019
medline:
11
7
2020
entrez:
29
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As the application of next generation sequencing (NGS) is moving to earlier stages in the diagnostic pipeline for primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), re-evaluation of its effectiveness is required. The aim of this study is to systematically review the diagnostic yield of NGS in PIDs. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible when describing the use of NGS in patients that had previously been diagnosed with PID on clinical and/or laboratory findings. Relevant data on study characteristics, technological performance and diagnostic yield were extracted. Fourteen studies were eligible for data extraction. Six studies described patient populations from specific PID subcategories. The remaining studies included patients with unsorted PIDs. The studies were based on populations from Italy, Iran, Turkey, Thailand, the Netherlands, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Eight studies used an array-based targeted gene panel, four used WES in combination with a PID filter, and two used both techniques. The mean reported reading depth ranged from 98 to 1337 times. Five studies described the sensitivity of the applied techniques, ranging from 83 to 100%, whereas specificity ranged from 45 to 99.9%. The percentage of patients who were genetically diagnosed ranged from 15 to 79%. Several studies described clinical implications of the genetic findings. NGS has the ability to contribute significantly to the identification of molecular mechanisms in PID patients. The diagnostic yield highly depends on population and on the technical circumstances under which NGS is employed. Further research is needed to determine the exact diagnostic yield and clinical implications of NGS in patients with PID.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
As the application of next generation sequencing (NGS) is moving to earlier stages in the diagnostic pipeline for primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), re-evaluation of its effectiveness is required. The aim of this study is to systematically review the diagnostic yield of NGS in PIDs.
METHODS
PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible when describing the use of NGS in patients that had previously been diagnosed with PID on clinical and/or laboratory findings. Relevant data on study characteristics, technological performance and diagnostic yield were extracted.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were eligible for data extraction. Six studies described patient populations from specific PID subcategories. The remaining studies included patients with unsorted PIDs. The studies were based on populations from Italy, Iran, Turkey, Thailand, the Netherlands, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Eight studies used an array-based targeted gene panel, four used WES in combination with a PID filter, and two used both techniques. The mean reported reading depth ranged from 98 to 1337 times. Five studies described the sensitivity of the applied techniques, ranging from 83 to 100%, whereas specificity ranged from 45 to 99.9%. The percentage of patients who were genetically diagnosed ranged from 15 to 79%. Several studies described clinical implications of the genetic findings.
DISCUSSION
NGS has the ability to contribute significantly to the identification of molecular mechanisms in PID patients. The diagnostic yield highly depends on population and on the technical circumstances under which NGS is employed. Further research is needed to determine the exact diagnostic yield and clinical implications of NGS in patients with PID.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31250335
doi: 10.1007/s10875-019-00656-x
pii: 10.1007/s10875-019-00656-x
pmc: PMC6697711
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
577-591Références
Int J Pediatr. 2018 Apr 23;2018:3527480
pubmed: 29849668
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S297-305
pubmed: 20042230
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Oct;138(4):1142-1151.e2
pubmed: 27484032
Front Immunol. 2016 Jun 13;7:220
pubmed: 27379089
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Apr;54(2):261-268
pubmed: 29030829
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Mar;48(3):202-9
pubmed: 21564385
J Clin Immunol. 2015 May;35(4):416-30
pubmed: 25893636
Scand J Immunol. 2017 Mar;85(3):227-234
pubmed: 28109013
Front Immunol. 2016 Nov 07;7:466
pubmed: 27872624
Hum Hered. 2014;77(1-4):138-43
pubmed: 25060276
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Aug;136(2):476-9.e6
pubmed: 25981738
Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):1-6
pubmed: 12507953
Front Immunol. 2017 Jul 24;8:847
pubmed: 28791010
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 16;2018:9647253
pubmed: 29888287
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;122(6):1069-73
pubmed: 18992927
J Clin Immunol. 2018 Apr;38(3):320-329
pubmed: 29675737
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;139(1):232-245
pubmed: 27577878
Eur J Immunol. 2014 Oct;44(10):2854-61
pubmed: 25154746
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jun;94:103174
pubmed: 30965134
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb;133(2):529-34
pubmed: 24139496
Front Immunol. 2014 Nov 03;5:531
pubmed: 25404929
Clin Exp Immunol. 2018 Jun;192(3):284-291
pubmed: 29878323
J Clin Immunol. 2016 May;36 Suppl 1:68-75
pubmed: 26993986
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 11;9(12):e114901
pubmed: 25502423
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):243-251
pubmed: 29921932
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Apr;141(4):1450-1458
pubmed: 28916186
Clin Genet. 2018 Mar;93(3):647-655
pubmed: 29077208
J Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;37(1):42-50
pubmed: 27807805
Clin Exp Immunol. 2017 Jun;188(3):326-332
pubmed: 28236292
J Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;37(1):67-79
pubmed: 27747465
J Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;38(1):96-128
pubmed: 29226302
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Jun;137(6):1780-1787
pubmed: 26915675
Clin Immunol. 2015 Oct;160(2):301-14
pubmed: 26122175
Int J Hematol. 2017 Aug;106(2):282-290
pubmed: 28353193
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Oct;14(10):468
pubmed: 25149170
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Oct;138(4):957-969
pubmed: 27720020