General practitioners' perceptions about their role in current and future heart failure care: an exploratory qualitative study.
Disease management
General practice
Heart failure
Qualitative research
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2019
28 Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
04
07
2018
accepted:
17
06
2019
entrez:
30
6
2019
pubmed:
30
6
2019
medline:
5
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A comprehensive disease management programme (DMP) with a central role for general practitioners (GPs) is needed to improve heart failure (HF) care. However, previous research has shown that GPs have mixed experiences with multidisciplinary HF care. Therefore, in this study, we explore the perceptions that GPs have regarding their role in current and future HF care, prior to the design of an HF disease management programme. This was a qualitative semi-structured interview study with Belgian GPs until data saturation was reached. The QUAGOL method was used for data analysis. In general, GPs wanted to assume a central role in HF care. Current interdisciplinary collaboration with cardiologists was perceived as smooth, partly because of the ease of access. In contrast, due to less well-established communication and the variable knowledge of nurses regarding HF care, collaboration with home care nurses was perceived as suboptimal. With regard to the future organization of HF care, all GPs confirmed the need for a structured chronic care approach and envisioned this as a multidisciplinary care pathway: flexible, patient-centred, without additional administration and with appropriate delegation of some critical tasks, including education and monitoring. GPs considered all-round general practice nurses as the preferred partner to delegate tasks to in HF care and reported limited experience in collaborating with specialist HF nurses. GPs expressed the need for a protocol-driven care pathway in chronic HF care. However, in contrast to the existing care trajectories, this pathway should be flexible, without additional administrative burdens and with a central role for GPs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A comprehensive disease management programme (DMP) with a central role for general practitioners (GPs) is needed to improve heart failure (HF) care. However, previous research has shown that GPs have mixed experiences with multidisciplinary HF care. Therefore, in this study, we explore the perceptions that GPs have regarding their role in current and future HF care, prior to the design of an HF disease management programme.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a qualitative semi-structured interview study with Belgian GPs until data saturation was reached. The QUAGOL method was used for data analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In general, GPs wanted to assume a central role in HF care. Current interdisciplinary collaboration with cardiologists was perceived as smooth, partly because of the ease of access. In contrast, due to less well-established communication and the variable knowledge of nurses regarding HF care, collaboration with home care nurses was perceived as suboptimal. With regard to the future organization of HF care, all GPs confirmed the need for a structured chronic care approach and envisioned this as a multidisciplinary care pathway: flexible, patient-centred, without additional administration and with appropriate delegation of some critical tasks, including education and monitoring. GPs considered all-round general practice nurses as the preferred partner to delegate tasks to in HF care and reported limited experience in collaborating with specialist HF nurses.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
GPs expressed the need for a protocol-driven care pathway in chronic HF care. However, in contrast to the existing care trajectories, this pathway should be flexible, without additional administrative burdens and with a central role for GPs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31253146
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4271-2
pii: 10.1186/s12913-019-4271-2
pmc: PMC6599228
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
432Références
Eur J Heart Fail. 2002 Dec;4(6):771-7
pubmed: 12453549
Lancet. 2002 Nov 23;360(9346):1631-9
pubmed: 12457785
BMJ. 2003 Jan 25;326(7382):196
pubmed: 12543836
Eur J Heart Fail. 2003 Jun;5(3):337-44
pubmed: 12798832
Med J Aust. 2004 Jul 19;181(2):78-81
pubmed: 15257642
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 18;44(4):810-9
pubmed: 15312864
Eur J Heart Fail. 2005 Dec;7(7):1133-44
pubmed: 16198629
Eur Heart J. 2006 Mar;27(5):596-612
pubmed: 16299021
J Card Fail. 2006 Sep;12(7):554-67
pubmed: 16952790
Circulation. 2006 Dec 5;114(23):2466-73
pubmed: 17116767
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):759-69
pubmed: 18474969
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Mar;13(3):235-41
pubmed: 21159794
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Mar;49(3):360-71
pubmed: 21996649
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD002752
pubmed: 22972058
BMC Geriatr. 2013 Jul 05;13:69
pubmed: 23829674
CMAJ. 2013 Oct 1;185(14):E681-9
pubmed: 23959284
BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 01;4(3):e003866
pubmed: 24691215
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jun 3;160(11):774-84
pubmed: 24862840
Can J Aging. 2014 Sep;33(3):320-35
pubmed: 25102362
Lancet. 2015 Feb 28;385(9970):812-24
pubmed: 25467564
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;201:368-75
pubmed: 26310979
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015 Aug 19;8:365-76
pubmed: 26316775
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jan;64(1):e1-7
pubmed: 26626408
BMJ Open. 2016 May 10;6(5):e010933
pubmed: 27165648
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975
pubmed: 27207191
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Oct;74(5):551-581
pubmed: 27353602
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 27;6(9):e012265
pubmed: 27678540
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 30;6(11):e013459
pubmed: 27903565
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Apr 15;257:199-206
pubmed: 29395362