Cross-cultural validation of the work functioning impairment scale (WFun) among Japanese, English, and Chinese versions using Rasch analysis.
China
Japan
patient outcome assessment
presenteeism
translations
work capacity evaluation
Journal
Journal of occupational health
ISSN: 1348-9585
Titre abrégé: J Occup Health
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9616320
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
16
10
2018
revised:
23
04
2019
accepted:
08
06
2019
pubmed:
30
6
2019
medline:
13
3
2020
entrez:
30
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The work functioning impairment scale (WFun) was developed to measure the degree of work functioning impairment in Japanese workers based on the Rasch model. Given that the number of foreign workers employed in Japan and abroad has increased in recent years, a multilingual questionnaire is becoming increasingly necessary to investigate work functioning impairment in these workers. The purpose of this study was to verify the cross-cultural validity of WFun between Japanese, Chinese, and English versions. A cross-sectional study was conducted in two stages. First, the Chinese and English versions of WFun were created. Second, an internet survey was conducted among 1000 Japanese, 400 Chinese, and 300 Americans. Estimates and standard errors of an individual's ability and item difficulty were calculated using the Rasch model. Differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) were also examined using Rasch model analyses. The effect size of DIF for one item in the English version exceeded 0.5 logit, indicating the presence of some DIF. In contrast, the effect sizes of DIF for all other items were below 0.5 logit, indicating that the influence of DIF was negligible. Furthermore, Rasch measurements according to the raw score for each version of WFun showed strong agreement among the three versions, with an intraclass correlation of 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.97-0.99), indicating the absence of DTF. Our findings indicate that the English, Chinese, and Japanese versions of WFun have good comparability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31254306
doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12072
pmc: PMC6842009
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
464-470Subventions
Organisme : UOEH Research Grant for Promotion of Occupational Health
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health.
Références
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Nov;52(11):1055-67
pubmed: 21063183
Value Health. 2002 Mar-Apr;5(2):106-13
pubmed: 11918826
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45
pubmed: 20494804
Med Care. 2001 Jan;39(1):72-85
pubmed: 11176545
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32
pubmed: 8263569
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41
pubmed: 25698408
J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jan;44(1):14-20
pubmed: 11802460
J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Feb;45(2):156-74
pubmed: 12625231
J Occup Health. 2018 Mar 27;60(2):156-162
pubmed: 29311438
J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Jul;49(7):712-21
pubmed: 17622843
Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):649-59
pubmed: 12719689
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;163(9):1569-76
pubmed: 16946182
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(5):365-78
pubmed: 19586075
J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jun;44(6):523-9
pubmed: 12085478
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1966 May;19(1):49-57
pubmed: 5939145
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 May;176(5):257-63
pubmed: 3367140
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;64(5):768-75
pubmed: 21073107
J Occup Health. 2015;57(6):521-31
pubmed: 26345178
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Apr;11(1 Suppl):S17-26
pubmed: 15926760
J Occup Health. 2019 Nov;61(6):464-470
pubmed: 31254306
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jun;59(6):557-562
pubmed: 28598932
J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Apr;45(4):349-59
pubmed: 12708138