Off-label use of ceftaroline fosamil: A systematic review.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Bacteremia
/ drug therapy
Cephalosporins
/ therapeutic use
Community-Acquired Infections
/ drug therapy
Cross Infection
/ drug therapy
Endocarditis, Bacterial
/ drug therapy
Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia
/ drug therapy
Humans
Meningitis
/ drug therapy
Off-Label Use
/ statistics & numerical data
Ceftaroline
Bacteremia
Ceftaroline fosamil
Endocarditis
MRSA
Meningitis
Off-label
Journal
International journal of antimicrobial agents
ISSN: 1872-7913
Titre abrégé: Int J Antimicrob Agents
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9111860
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
14
12
2018
revised:
25
06
2019
accepted:
28
06
2019
pubmed:
7
7
2019
medline:
5
3
2020
entrez:
7
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ceftaroline fosamil is a fifth-generation cephalosporin with anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) activity. It has been approved by the EMA and FDA for the treatment of adults and children with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). However, ceftaroline fosamil has a broad spectrum of activity, and a good safety and tolerability profile, so is frequently used off-label. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the safety and efficacy of off-label use of ceftaroline. The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases (2010-2018) were searched using as the main term ceftaroline fosamil and its synonyms in combination with names of infectious diseases of interest. A total of 21 studies with 1901 patients were included: the most common off-label indications for ceftaroline use were bacteremia (n=595), endocarditis (n=171), osteoarticular infections (n=368), hospital-acquired pneumonia (n=115) and meningitis (n=23). The most common reasons for off-label use were persistent or recurrent infection after standard treatment or non-susceptibility to vancomycin and daptomycin. Clinical success was evaluated in 933 patients, and 724 (77%) of these reached this positive outcome. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was reported in 11 studies. In 83 (9%) cases there were AEs related to the use of ceftaroline; the most common reported AEs were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, rash and neutropenia. The review results show that ceftaroline may be used in clinical settings other than those currently approved; however, the use of ceftaroline in these contexts deserves further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31279152
pii: S0924-8579(19)30178-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.06.025
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Cephalosporins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
562-571Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.