Impact of applying different resting blood pressure cut-points to clear for maximal exercise.
Adult
Age Factors
Blood Pressure
/ physiology
Blood Pressure Determination
/ standards
Body Mass Index
Employee Performance Appraisal
/ methods
Exercise
/ physiology
Female
Fitness Centers
/ standards
Humans
Male
Occupational Health
/ standards
Oxygen Consumption
/ physiology
Physical Examination
/ methods
Reference Standards
Rest
/ physiology
Young Adult
Risk stratification
adverse events
blood pressure screening
physically demanding occupations
Journal
Work (Reading, Mass.)
ISSN: 1875-9270
Titre abrégé: Work
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9204382
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
pubmed:
10
7
2019
medline:
28
1
2020
entrez:
9
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of applying six commonly-used and two proposed resting blood pressure (BP) cut-points to clear individuals for maximal exercise in non-clinical health, wellness, commercial fitness agencies and physically demanding occupation test sites. Participants (n = 1670) completed the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+) and had their resting BP measured. Individuals with a BP >160/90 mmHg were further screened for contraindications to exercise using the ePARMed-X+ (www.eparmedx.com), all 1670 were cleared. There were no adverse events during or post exercise. The percentages of participants cleared for each BP cut-point were: <130/80 mmHg (85.3%), <140/90 mmHg (93.4%), <144/90 mmHg (94.6%), <144/94 mmHg (96.3%), <150/100 mmHg (98.6%), <160/90 mmHg (95.6%), <160/94 mmHg (97.8%) and <160/100 mmHg (99.5%). Individuals who would not have been cleared without further screening were significantly older, had a higher BMI, or had a lower maximal oxygen consumption. Conservative or lower resting BP cut-points currently applied to clear individuals for maximal exercise provide an unnecessary barrier. For individuals categorized as low-to- moderate risk by evidence-based screening tools such as the PAR-Q+ and ePARmed-X+, we recommend a resting BP cut-point of <160/94 mmHg to clear for maximal exercise until sufficient evidence is amassed to support the increase to <160/100 mmHg.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31282454
pii: WOR192952
doi: 10.3233/WOR-192952
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM