A Peptoid Delivers CoQ-derivative to Plant Mitochondria via Endocytosis.
Actins
/ metabolism
Cell Line
Cell Proliferation
/ drug effects
Cell Survival
/ drug effects
Clathrin
/ metabolism
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Endocytosis
Mitochondria
/ chemistry
Molecular Structure
Peptoids
/ chemistry
Proof of Concept Study
Salts
/ adverse effects
Nicotiana
/ cytology
Ubiquinone
/ analogs & derivatives
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 07 2019
08 07 2019
Historique:
received:
27
10
2018
accepted:
21
06
2019
entrez:
10
7
2019
pubmed:
10
7
2019
medline:
22
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Controlled delivery of molecules interfering specifically with target activities in a cell of interest can be a powerful tool for experimental manipulation, because it can be administered at a defined time point and does not require genetic transformation, which in some systems is difficult and time consuming. Peptides as versatile tools that can be tailored for binding numerous binding partners, are of special interest. However, their passage through membranes, their intracellular targeting, and their sensitivity to proteases is limiting. The use of peptoids, where cationic amino-acid side chains are linked to nitrogen (rather than to carbon) of the peptide bond, can circumvent these limitations, because they are not cleavable by proteases. In the current work, we provide a proof-of-concept that such Trojan Peptoids, the plant PeptoQ, can be used to target a functional cargo (i.e. a rhodamine-labelled peptoid and a coenzyme Q10 derivative) into mitochondria of tobacco BY-2 cells as experimental model. We show that the uptake is specific for mitochondria, rapid, dose-dependent, and requires clathrin-mediated endocytosis, as well as actin filaments, while microtubules seem to be dispensable. Viability of the treated cells is not affected, and they show better survival under salt stress, a condition that perturbs oxidative homeostasis in mitochondria. In congruence with improved homeostasis, we observe that the salt induced accumulation of superoxide is mitigated and even inverted by pretreatment with PeptoQ. Using double labelling with appropriate fluorescent markers, we show that targeting of this Trojan Peptoid to the mitochondria is not based on a passage through the plasma membrane (as thought hitherto), but on import via endocytotic vesicles and subsequent accumulation in the mitochondrial intermembrane space, from where it can enter the matrix, e.g. when the permeability of the inner membrane is increased under salt stress.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31285457
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46182-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-46182-z
pmc: PMC6614412
doi:
Substances chimiques
Actins
0
Clathrin
0
Peptoids
0
Salts
0
Ubiquinone
1339-63-5
coenzyme Q10
EJ27X76M46
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9839Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154081
pubmed: 27100681
J Exp Bot. 2014 Mar;65(5):1361-75
pubmed: 24420571
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003;19:287-332
pubmed: 14570572
Chembiochem. 2009 Oct 12;10(15):2504-12
pubmed: 19739189
AAPS J. 2006 Apr 21;8(2):E277-83
pubmed: 16796378
Beilstein J Org Chem. 2013;9:56-63
pubmed: 23399592
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1865
pubmed: 23689559
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Mar;1758(3):260-3
pubmed: 16574060
J Virol. 2001 Mar;75(5):2488-92
pubmed: 11160755
Traffic. 2016 Oct;17(10):1139-49
pubmed: 27392092
J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Jun 22;133(24):9293-303
pubmed: 21548646
Chem Rev. 1996 Nov 7;96(7):2841-2888
pubmed: 11848843
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995 May 24;1271(1):195-204
pubmed: 7599208
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2006 Jan;3(1):1-10
pubmed: 16370936
Biomacromolecules. 2018 May 14;19(5):1582-1591
pubmed: 29601191
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Jun 01;5(6):
pubmed: 23732476
J Plant Physiol. 2014 Jan 15;171(2):97-108
pubmed: 24331424
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Nov 01;5(11):a016790
pubmed: 24186068
Protoplasma. 2016 Jul;253(4):1159-74
pubmed: 26315821
J Plant Physiol. 2006 May;163(7):731-9
pubmed: 16616584
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006 Dec;9(6):601-9
pubmed: 17010656
Plant Cell Physiol. 2017 Jan 1;58(1):71-85
pubmed: 28173585
J Biol Chem. 1985 Jan 25;260(2):963-73
pubmed: 2981854
Chembiochem. 2011 Jan 3;12(1):132-7
pubmed: 21154994
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 May 20;1669(2):101-7
pubmed: 15893512
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Jun 01;5(6):
pubmed: 23732475
Bioelectrochemistry. 2016 Oct;111:100-8
pubmed: 27268099
Front Plant Sci. 2012 Apr 18;3:73
pubmed: 22645598
Plant J. 2012 Jan;69(2):204-16
pubmed: 21910772
Biopolymers. 2011;96(5):694-701
pubmed: 22180914
Phytochem Anal. 2011 May-Jun;22(3):268-71
pubmed: 21360621
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Mar;1768(3):419-26
pubmed: 17214959
Dev Cell. 2013 Mar 25;24(6):649-59
pubmed: 23477787
J Exp Bot. 2002 May;53(371):1215-8
pubmed: 11971932
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Sep 24;6:783
pubmed: 26442089
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 May;1787(5):437-61
pubmed: 19159610
Plant Physiol. 2006 Jun;141(2):357-66
pubmed: 16760488
J Biotechnol. 2006 Jun 25;124(1):128-45
pubmed: 16516322
J Exp Bot. 2010 Aug;61(13):3589-98
pubmed: 20595238
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(11):3051-68
pubmed: 18603619
Eur J Biochem. 1992 Apr 15;205(2):841-6
pubmed: 1572375
Plant J. 2005 Nov;44(4):595-605
pubmed: 16262709
Plant Cell Rep. 2009 May;28(5):801-10
pubmed: 19288265
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jul;62(11):3863-74
pubmed: 21460385
Physiol Plant. 2010 Apr;138(4):447-62
pubmed: 20059731
Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Nov;16(11):614-23
pubmed: 21903446
Org Lett. 2002 Nov 14;4(23):4057-9
pubmed: 12423085
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2012 Nov 23;5(12):1265-81
pubmed: 24281336
J Exp Bot. 2014 Jul;65(12):2963-79
pubmed: 24755280
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 15;89(20):9367-71
pubmed: 1409642
Plant Cell. 1999 Apr;11(4):571-86
pubmed: 10213779
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 21;97(24):13003-8
pubmed: 11087855
Mol Ther. 2004 Dec;10(6):1011-22
pubmed: 15564133
Nature. 2001 Sep 27;413(6854):425-8
pubmed: 11574889
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 May;1787(5):468-75
pubmed: 19366606
Biochem Soc Trans. 2007 Aug;35(Pt 4):816-20
pubmed: 17635155
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 Dec;40(12):2875-2905
pubmed: 28741669
Curr Med Chem. 2006;13(12):1371-87
pubmed: 16719783
Plant Physiol. 2001 Jul;126(3):1266-74
pubmed: 11457977
J Physiol. 2003 Oct 15;552(Pt 2):335-44
pubmed: 14561818
Plant J. 1998 Aug;15(3):441-7
pubmed: 9750355
J Exp Bot. 2002 Apr;53(369):659-67
pubmed: 11886885
J Plant Physiol. 2017 Nov;218:6-15
pubmed: 28763708
FEBS J. 2008 May;275(10):2403-14
pubmed: 18397318
J Exp Bot. 2007;58(2):195-210
pubmed: 17261694
Biochemistry. 2007 Jan 16;46(2):492-501
pubmed: 17209559
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013 Jun;14(6):382-92
pubmed: 23698585
J Cell Sci. 2007 Nov 1;120(Pt 21):3804-19
pubmed: 17940063
J Biol Chem. 1998 Feb 13;273(7):3848-53
pubmed: 9461565
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(11):3075-83
pubmed: 19436047
Sci Rep. 2015 Jan 13;5:7751
pubmed: 25583214
J Biophys. 2011;2011:414729
pubmed: 21687343
Eur J Cell Biol. 2005 Jun;84(6):609-21
pubmed: 16032929
Ann Bot. 2015 Feb;115(3):419-31
pubmed: 25466549
FASEB J. 2005 Jul;19(9):1088-95
pubmed: 15985532
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Sep;1808(9):2304-12
pubmed: 21669183
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005 Jan;2(1):89-102
pubmed: 16296737