Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Improves Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma with Extramedullary Disease and High-Risk Cytogenetics: A Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.


Journal

Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
ISSN: 1523-6536
Titre abrégé: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9600628

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 14 05 2019
revised: 02 07 2019
accepted: 03 07 2019
pubmed: 10 7 2019
medline: 18 8 2020
entrez: 10 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant combined with novel agents continues to be the hallmark of first-line treatment in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients, the impact of tandem autologous or autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant for patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) and high-risk cytogenetics is not yet defined. Here, we analyzed clinical and cytogenetic data from 488 adult myeloma patients with EMD undergoing single autologous (n = 373), tandem autologous (n = 84), or autologous-allogeneic transplant (n = 31) between 2003 and 2015. At least 1 high-risk abnormality was present in 41% (n = 202), with del(17p) (40%) and t(4;14) (45%) the most frequent. More than 1 high-risk abnormality was found in 54%. High-risk cytogenetics showed worse 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 54% and 29%, respectively, versus 78% and 49% for standard-risk cytogenetics (P < .001). Co-segregation of high-risk abnormalities did not seem to affect outcome. Regarding transplant regimen, OS and PFS were 70% and 43% for single autologous versus 83% and 52% for tandem autologous and 88% and 58% for autologous-allogeneic (P = .06 and P = .30). In multivariate analysis high-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; P = .003), whereas tandem autologous significantly improved outcome versus single autologous transplant (HRs, .46 and .64; P = .02 and P = .03). Autologous-allogeneic transplant did not significantly differ in outcome but appeared to improve survival, but results were limited because of small population (HR, .31). In conclusion, high-risk cytogenetics is frequently observed in newly diagnosed myeloma with EMD and significantly worsens outcome after single autologous, whereas a tandem autologous transplant strategy may overcome onset poor prognosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31288095
pii: S1083-8791(19)30436-7
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2134-2142

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Nico Gagelmann (N)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Diderik-Jan Eikema (DJ)

EBMT Statistical Unit, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Linda Koster (L)

EBMT Data Office, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Denis Caillot (D)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Dijon, France.

Pietro Pioltelli (P)

Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.

Juan Bargay Lleonart (JB)

Hospital son LLatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

Péter Reményi (P)

St. István and St. Laszlo Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.

Didier Blaise (D)

Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Nicolaas Schaap (N)

Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Marek Trneny (M)

Charles University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Jakob Passweg (J)

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

Rocio Parody Porras (RP)

ICO-Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.

Jean Yves Cahn (JY)

Hôpital A. Michallon, Grenoble, France.

Maurizio Musso (M)

Ospedale La Maddalena, Palermo, Italy.

Xavier Poiré (X)

Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Roland Fenk (R)

Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Maija Itälä-Remes (M)

Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Vincenzo Pavone (V)

Hospital C. Panico, Tricase, Italy.

Loic Fouillard (L)

Grand Hôpital de l`Est Francilien, Meaux, France.

Johan Maertens (J)

University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

Dominique Bron (D)

Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.

Anastasia Pouli (A)

St. Savvas Oncology Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Wilfried Schroyens (W)

University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.

Stefan Schönland (S)

Medizinische Klinik V, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Laurent Garderet (L)

Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.

Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha (I)

CHU de Lille, LIRIC, INSEM U995, Université Lille2, Lille, France.

Nicolaus Kröger (N)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: b.ramme@uke.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH