Response of Amaranthus spp. following exposure to sublethal herbicide rates via spray particle drift.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
30
04
2019
accepted:
05
07
2019
entrez:
19
7
2019
pubmed:
19
7
2019
medline:
4
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The adverse consequences of herbicide drift towards sensitive crops have been extensively reported in the literature. However, little to no information is available on the consequences of herbicide drift onto weed species inhabiting boundaries of agricultural fields. Exposure to herbicide drift could be detrimental to long-term weed management as several weed species have evolved herbicide-resistance after recurrent selection with sublethal herbicide rates This study investigated the deposition of glyphosate, 2,4-D, and dicamba spray particle drift from applications with two different nozzles in a low speed wind tunnel, and their impact on growth and development of Amaranthus spp. Herbicide drift resulted in biomass reduction or complete plant mortality. Inflection points (distance to 50% biomass reduction) for Amaranthus tuberculatus were 7.7, 4.0, and 4.1 m downwind distance for glyphosate, 2,4-D, and dicamba applications with the flat-fan nozzle, respectively, whereas these values corresponded to 2.8, 2.5, and 1.9 m for applications with the air-inclusion nozzle. Inflection points for Amaranthus palmeri biomass reduction were 16.3, 10.9, and 11.5 m for glyphosate, 2,4-D, and dicamba applications with the flat-fan nozzle, respectively, whereas these values corresponded to 7.6, 5.4, and 5.4 m for applications with the air-inclusion nozzle. Plants were more sensitive to glyphosate at higher exposure rates than other herbicides, whereas plants were more sensitive to 2,4-D and dicamba at lower exposure rates compared to glyphosate. Applications with the flat-fan nozzle resulted in 32.3 and 11.5% drift of the applied rate at 1.0 and 3.0 m downwind, respectively, whereas the air-inclusion nozzle decreased the dose exposure in the same distances (11.4 and 2.7%, respectively). Herbicide drift towards field boundaries was influenced by nozzle design and exposed weeds to herbicide rates previously reported to select for herbicide-resistant biotypes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31318947
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220014
pii: PONE-D-19-12305
pmc: PMC6638980
doi:
Substances chimiques
Herbicides
0
Glycine
TE7660XO1C
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0220014Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Jan;12(1):6-13
pubmed: 17161644
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 22;7:44913
pubmed: 28327669
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Mar;67(3):253-7
pubmed: 21308950
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 Mar;72(3):603-8
pubmed: 25988941
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Aug;74(8):1759-1768
pubmed: 29688592
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 Nov;72(11):2091-2098
pubmed: 27442188
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Apr;36(4):818-27
pubmed: 23046181
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Apr;110(6):1154-66
pubmed: 15756534
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Feb;74(2):275-281
pubmed: 28888062
Plant J. 2014 Jun;78(5):865-76
pubmed: 24654891
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Oct;74(10):2316-2324
pubmed: 29095567
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Mar 13;:
pubmed: 29536620
Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Oct;103(4):318-25
pubmed: 19491925
Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Dec;95(6):485-92
pubmed: 16175194
Pest Manag Sci. 2010 Oct;66(10):1148-54
pubmed: 20662010
Plant Physiol. 2014 Nov;166(3):1106-18
pubmed: 25106819
Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Sep;70(9):1385-93
pubmed: 24723489
Evol Appl. 2013 Feb;6(2):231-42
pubmed: 23798973
Plant J. 2018 Dec;96(5):1051-1063
pubmed: 30218635
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 12;11(4):e0148748
pubmed: 27071064
Evol Appl. 2012 Jan;5(1):29-38
pubmed: 25568027
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Apr 24;:
pubmed: 29688591