Midwives' perspectives on (dis)respectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.
Childbirth
Disrespect and abuse
Facility-based delivery
Midwifery
Respectful maternity care
Sub-Saharan Africa
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jul 2019
25 Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
26
12
2018
accepted:
09
07
2019
entrez:
27
7
2019
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
10
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the past decade, the negative impact of disrespectful maternity care on women's utilisation and experiences of facility-based delivery has been well documented. Less is known about midwives' perspectives on these labour ward dynamics. Yet efforts to provide care that satisfies women's psycho-socio-cultural needs rest on midwives' capacity and willingness to provide it. We performed a systematic review of the emerging literature documenting midwives' perspectives to explore the broader drivers of (dis)respectful care during facility-based delivery in the sub-Saharan African context. Seven databases (CINAHL, PsychINFO, PsychArticles, Embase, Global Health, Maternity and Infant Care and PubMed) were systematically searched from 1990 to May 2018. Primary qualitative studies with a substantial focus on the interpersonal aspects of care were eligible if they captured midwives' voices and perspectives. Study quality was independently assessed by two reviewers and PRISMA guidelines were followed. The results and findings from each study were synthesised using an existing conceptual framework of the drivers of disrespectful care. Eleven papers from six countries were included and six main themes were identified. 'Power and control' and 'Maintaining midwives' status' reflected midwives' focus on the micro-level interactions of the mother-midwife dyad. Meso-level drivers of disrespectful care were: the constraints of the 'Work environment and resources'; concerns about 'Midwives' position in the health systems hierarchy'; and the impact of 'Midwives' conceptualisations of respectful maternity care'. An emerging theme outlined the 'Impact on midwives' of (dis)respectful care. We used a theoretically informed conceptual framework to move beyond the micro-level and interrogate the social, cultural and historical factors that underpin (dis)respectful care. Controlling women was a key theme, echoing women's experiences, but midwives paid less attention to the social inequalities that distress women. The synthesis highlighted midwives' low status in the health system hierarchy, while organisational cultures of blame and a lack of consideration for them as professionals effectively constitute disrespect and abuse of these health workers. Broader, interdisciplinary perspectives on the wider drivers of midwives' disrespectful attitudes and behaviours are crucial if efforts to improve the maternity care environment - for women and midwives - are to succeed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the past decade, the negative impact of disrespectful maternity care on women's utilisation and experiences of facility-based delivery has been well documented. Less is known about midwives' perspectives on these labour ward dynamics. Yet efforts to provide care that satisfies women's psycho-socio-cultural needs rest on midwives' capacity and willingness to provide it. We performed a systematic review of the emerging literature documenting midwives' perspectives to explore the broader drivers of (dis)respectful care during facility-based delivery in the sub-Saharan African context.
METHODS
METHODS
Seven databases (CINAHL, PsychINFO, PsychArticles, Embase, Global Health, Maternity and Infant Care and PubMed) were systematically searched from 1990 to May 2018. Primary qualitative studies with a substantial focus on the interpersonal aspects of care were eligible if they captured midwives' voices and perspectives. Study quality was independently assessed by two reviewers and PRISMA guidelines were followed. The results and findings from each study were synthesised using an existing conceptual framework of the drivers of disrespectful care.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eleven papers from six countries were included and six main themes were identified. 'Power and control' and 'Maintaining midwives' status' reflected midwives' focus on the micro-level interactions of the mother-midwife dyad. Meso-level drivers of disrespectful care were: the constraints of the 'Work environment and resources'; concerns about 'Midwives' position in the health systems hierarchy'; and the impact of 'Midwives' conceptualisations of respectful maternity care'. An emerging theme outlined the 'Impact on midwives' of (dis)respectful care.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We used a theoretically informed conceptual framework to move beyond the micro-level and interrogate the social, cultural and historical factors that underpin (dis)respectful care. Controlling women was a key theme, echoing women's experiences, but midwives paid less attention to the social inequalities that distress women. The synthesis highlighted midwives' low status in the health system hierarchy, while organisational cultures of blame and a lack of consideration for them as professionals effectively constitute disrespect and abuse of these health workers. Broader, interdisciplinary perspectives on the wider drivers of midwives' disrespectful attitudes and behaviours are crucial if efforts to improve the maternity care environment - for women and midwives - are to succeed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31345239
doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0773-y
pii: 10.1186/s12978-019-0773-y
pmc: PMC6659209
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116Subventions
Organisme : City, University of London
ID : School of Health Sciences Doctoral Scholarship
Références
Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 19;11(1):71
pubmed: 25238684
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
Lancet. 2004 Nov 27-Dec 3;364(9449):1984-90
pubmed: 15567015
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 May-Jun;55(3):255-61
pubmed: 20434086
BJOG. 2018 Jul;125(8):932-942
pubmed: 29117644
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Nov 19;14:119
pubmed: 25407140
S Afr Med J. 2015 Apr;105(4):284-6
pubmed: 26294871
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2011 Jun;28(2):308-15
pubmed: 21845312
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 17;10(4):e0123606
pubmed: 25884566
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):e26-e33
pubmed: 29304252
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1146-1152
pubmed: 28541422
Anaesthesia. 2007 Dec;62 Suppl 1:38-43
pubmed: 17937712
Health Care Women Int. 2006 Feb;27(2):145-68
pubmed: 16484159
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Mar 21;15:65
pubmed: 25880644
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;169:157-170
pubmed: 27723514
BJOG. 2015 Jul;122(8):1045-9
pubmed: 25929823
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):263
pubmed: 28830383
Reprod Health Matters. 2016 May;24(47):47-55
pubmed: 27578338
Midwifery. 1996 Dec;12(4):165-73
pubmed: 9069909
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1284-99
pubmed: 17027735
Reprod Health Matters. 2006 May;14(27):40-50
pubmed: 16713878
Lancet. 2014 Sep 27;384(9949):1215-25
pubmed: 24965819
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Mar 1;32(2):215-224
pubmed: 28207054
Midwifery. 2018 Jul;62:256-263
pubmed: 29730166
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40220
pubmed: 22808121
PLoS Med. 2015 Jun 30;12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847
pubmed: 26126110
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45
pubmed: 18616818
Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(53):88-106
pubmed: 30132403
Global Health. 2015 Aug 15;11:36
pubmed: 26276053
J Adv Nurs. 1999 Sep;30(3):732-9
pubmed: 10499231
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004 Oct-Dec;19(4):337-64
pubmed: 15688877
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):e42-4
pubmed: 24965825
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Feb;128(2):95-9
pubmed: 25467915
Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:95-101
pubmed: 27428104
Lancet. 2014 Jul 5;384(9937):1
pubmed: 24998002
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 18;15:97
pubmed: 25928085
Curationis. 2010 Sep;33(3):5-14
pubmed: 21428234
Midwifery. 2012 Aug;28(4):481-8
pubmed: 21924533
Midwifery. 2016 Oct;41:39-44
pubmed: 27522042
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 14;13:61
pubmed: 23410228
PLoS One. 2016 May 02;11(5):e0153391
pubmed: 27135248
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):462-74
pubmed: 26584737
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014 Aug;48 Spec No:168-77
pubmed: 25517851