[Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic].
Protonthérapie des carcinomes épidermoïdes des voies aérodigestives supérieures : de la physique à la clinique.
Deglutition Disorders
/ etiology
Dysgeusia
/ etiology
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Health Physics
Humans
Hypothyroidism
/ etiology
Models, Theoretical
Organs at Risk
Proton Therapy
Radiation Injuries
/ etiology
Radiation Oncology
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ adverse effects
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
/ radiotherapy
Translational Research, Biomedical
Uncertainty
Xerostomia
/ etiology
Cancers de la tête et du cou
Image-guided
Proton therapy
Protonthérapie
Radiotherapy
Radiothérapie guidée par l’image
Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck
Journal
Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique
ISSN: 1769-6658
Titre abrégé: Cancer Radiother
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9711272
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
29
04
2019
revised:
09
05
2019
accepted:
16
05
2019
pubmed:
31
7
2019
medline:
17
9
2019
entrez:
31
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and hypothyroidism. An exhaustive research was performed with the search engine PubMed by focusing on the papers about the physical difficulties that slow down use of proton therapy for head and neck carcinomas. Range uncertainties in proton therapy (±3 %) paradoxically limit the use of the steep dose gradient in distality. Calibration uncertainties can be important in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the presence of materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition (such as with metal implants, dental filling, etc.) and complex heterogeneities. Dental management for example may be different with IMRT or proton therapy. Some uncertainties can be somewhat minimized at the time of optimization. Inter- and intrafractional variations and uncertainties in Hounsfield units/stopping power can be integrated in a robust optimization process. Additional changes in patient's anatomy (tumour shrinkage, changes in skin folds in the beam patch, large weight loss or gain) require rescanning. Dosimetric and small clinical studies comparing photon and proton therapy have well shown the interest of proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a promising treatment as it can reduce the substantial toxicity burden of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to IMRT. Robust optimization will allow to perform an optimal treatment and to use proton therapy in current clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31358445
pii: S1278-3218(19)30150-7
doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.05.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
fre
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
439-448Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.