Evaluation of low-dose glucocorticoid regimen in association with cyclophosphamide in patients with glomerulonephritis.
Administration, Intravenous
Adult
Cohort Studies
Cyclophosphamide
/ administration & dosage
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Glomerulonephritis
/ drug therapy
Glucocorticoids
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ administration & dosage
Male
Methylprednisolone
/ administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Infection
Low-dose corticosteroids
Primary glomerulonephritis
Remission
Side effects
Journal
International urology and nephrology
ISSN: 1573-2584
Titre abrégé: Int Urol Nephrol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0262521
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
28
02
2019
accepted:
26
07
2019
pubmed:
7
8
2019
medline:
20
2
2020
entrez:
7
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The treatment of most glomerulonephritides is still based on a combination of an oral corticosteroid and an alkylating agent, with favorable outcomes, but with serious side effects. The objective of this study was to reduce the cumulative corticosteroid dose in patients with high risk of corticosteroid-related adverse events by replacing daily oral corticosteroids with intravenous (iv) methylprednisolone pulses, associated with monthly pulse i.v. cyclophosphamide (according to KDIGO guidelines) in patients with glomerulonephritis. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single nephrology centre. In the course of a 6-month run-in phase, all the patients received non-immunosuppressive pathogenic treatment. High-risk patients, who still had urinary protein excretion of at least 3.5 g per day at the end of these 6 months, received a combination of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide. Patients were divided in two groups: group 1 (23 patients)-included patients with high risk of corticosteroid-related adverse events received monthly methylprednisolone 1 g/day, 3 days and i.v. cyclophosphamide for 6 months, and group 2 (84 patients)-received oral corticosteroids (as per KDIGO recommended dose) and i.v. cyclophosphamide. The primary outcome-time to a combined end-point of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, need for chronic renal replacement therapy or death; secondary outcomes: complete remission [proteinuria < 0.3 g per 24 h (urinary protein-creatinine rate < 300 mg/g [< 30 mg/mmol]]; partial remission (proteinuria > 0.3 but < 3.5 g per 24 h or a decrease in proteinuria by at least 50% from the initial value) and adverse events. At 6 months, there was no difference in the primary composite end-point: 8.7% patients from the group 1 and 20.2% patients from the group 2 (P = 0.199) reached this end-point. Similar data were also recorded at 12 months. Secondary end-points were also similar between treatment groups. More patients receiving oral corticosteroids experienced infections, but without statistical significance. Our data indicate that low i.v. dose corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide administered monthly in patients with high risk of corticosteroid-related adverse events and primary glomerulonephritis are equally effective, with fewer metabolic disorders and infections.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The treatment of most glomerulonephritides is still based on a combination of an oral corticosteroid and an alkylating agent, with favorable outcomes, but with serious side effects. The objective of this study was to reduce the cumulative corticosteroid dose in patients with high risk of corticosteroid-related adverse events by replacing daily oral corticosteroids with intravenous (iv) methylprednisolone pulses, associated with monthly pulse i.v. cyclophosphamide (according to KDIGO guidelines) in patients with glomerulonephritis.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single nephrology centre. In the course of a 6-month run-in phase, all the patients received non-immunosuppressive pathogenic treatment. High-risk patients, who still had urinary protein excretion of at least 3.5 g per day at the end of these 6 months, received a combination of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide. Patients were divided in two groups: group 1 (23 patients)-included patients with high risk of corticosteroid-related adverse events received monthly methylprednisolone 1 g/day, 3 days and i.v. cyclophosphamide for 6 months, and group 2 (84 patients)-received oral corticosteroids (as per KDIGO recommended dose) and i.v. cyclophosphamide. The primary outcome-time to a combined end-point of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, need for chronic renal replacement therapy or death; secondary outcomes: complete remission [proteinuria < 0.3 g per 24 h (urinary protein-creatinine rate < 300 mg/g [< 30 mg/mmol]]; partial remission (proteinuria > 0.3 but < 3.5 g per 24 h or a decrease in proteinuria by at least 50% from the initial value) and adverse events.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At 6 months, there was no difference in the primary composite end-point: 8.7% patients from the group 1 and 20.2% patients from the group 2 (P = 0.199) reached this end-point. Similar data were also recorded at 12 months. Secondary end-points were also similar between treatment groups. More patients receiving oral corticosteroids experienced infections, but without statistical significance.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our data indicate that low i.v. dose corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide administered monthly in patients with high risk of corticosteroid-related adverse events and primary glomerulonephritis are equally effective, with fewer metabolic disorders and infections.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31385176
doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02249-4
pii: 10.1007/s11255-019-02249-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glucocorticoids
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Methylprednisolone
X4W7ZR7023
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1805-1813Références
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 19;150(10):670-80
pubmed: 19451574
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Jun;69(6):788-795
pubmed: 28215945
Kidney Int. 2012 Oct;82(8):840-56
pubmed: 22895519
Autoimmun Rev. 2015 Oct;14(10):875-9
pubmed: 26044819
Lancet. 2017 Mar 25;389(10075):1238-1252
pubmed: 27887750
Kidney Int Rep. 2017 Feb 09;2(4):603-609
pubmed: 29142978
Autoimmun Rev. 2014 Feb;13(2):206-14
pubmed: 24189280
Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2036-48
pubmed: 26921911
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 May;8(5):787-96
pubmed: 23449768
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;33(4):289-94
pubmed: 11588541
Autoimmun Rev. 2017 Aug;16(8):826-832
pubmed: 28564619
JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):432-442
pubmed: 28763548
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Apr;37(4):1085-1090
pubmed: 29247314
Kidney Int. 2010 Aug;78(4):337-42
pubmed: 20520593