Bioinformatics classification of mutations in patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIA.
Molecular dynamics simulations analysis
Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIA
SGSH
Sanfilippo syndrome
nsSNPs
Journal
Metabolic brain disease
ISSN: 1573-7365
Titre abrégé: Metab Brain Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610370
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
30
04
2019
accepted:
08
07
2019
pubmed:
7
8
2019
medline:
15
5
2020
entrez:
7
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) IIIA, also known as Sanfilippo syndrome type A, is a severe, progressive disease that affects the central nervous system (CNS). MPS IIIA is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner and is caused by a deficiency in the lysosomal enzyme sulfamidase, which is required for the degradation of heparan sulfate. The sulfamidase is produced by the N-sulphoglucosamine sulphohydrolase (SGSH) gene. In MPS IIIA patients, the excess of lysosomal storage of heparan sulfate often leads to mental retardation, hyperactive behavior, and connective tissue impairments, which occur due to various known missense mutations in the SGSH, leading to protein dysfunction. In this study, we focused on three mutations (R74C, S66W, and R245H) based on in silico pathogenic, conservation, and stability prediction tool studies. The three mutations were further subjected to molecular dynamic simulation (MDS) analysis using GROMACS simulation software to observe the structural changes they induced, and all the mutants exhibited maximum deviation patterns compared with the native protein. Conformational changes were observed in the mutants based on various geometrical parameters, such as conformational stability, fluctuation, and compactness, followed by hydrogen bonding, physicochemical properties, principal component analysis (PCA), and salt bridge analyses, which further validated the underlying cause of the protein instability. Additionally, secondary structure and surrounding amino acid analyses further confirmed the above results indicating the loss of protein function in the mutants compared with the native protein. The present results reveal the effects of three mutations on the enzymatic activity of sulfamidase, providing a molecular explanation for the cause of the disease. Thus, this study allows for a better understanding of the effect of SGSH mutations through the use of various computational approaches in terms of both structure and functions and provides a platform for the development of therapeutic drugs and potential disease treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31385193
doi: 10.1007/s11011-019-00465-6
pii: 10.1007/s11011-019-00465-6
pmc: PMC6858298
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydrolases
EC 3.-
N-sulfoglucosamine sulfohydrolase
EC 3.10.1.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1577-1594Références
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;490:227-60
pubmed: 19157086
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2005;28(6):1011-7
pubmed: 16435194
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013 Jul;66(3):681-95
pubmed: 23300027
Hum Mutat. 2012 Feb;33(2):332-7
pubmed: 22045683
J Theor Biol. 2018 Jan 21;437:305-317
pubmed: 29111421
J Mol Med (Berl). 1999 Nov;77(11):754-60
pubmed: 10619435
Ann Neurol. 2017 Nov;82(5):686-696
pubmed: 29023963
Dis Model Mech. 2014 Jan;7(1):9-14
pubmed: 24396149
Hum Mutat. 2001 Oct;18(4):264-81
pubmed: 11668611
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3812-4
pubmed: 12824425
J Mol Graph Model. 2011 Feb;29(5):663-75
pubmed: 21215670
J Biol Chem. 1999 Dec 24;274(52):37193-9
pubmed: 10601282
J Comput Chem. 2004 Oct;25(13):1605-12
pubmed: 15264254
Science. 2012 Nov 23;338(6110):1042-6
pubmed: 23180855
Protein Eng. 1997 Jan;10(1):7-21
pubmed: 9051729
Hum Mutat. 2013 Jan;34(1):57-65
pubmed: 23033316
Electrophoresis. 1997 Dec;18(15):2714-23
pubmed: 9504803
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2017 Sep;35(12):2714-2724
pubmed: 27677677
Hum Mol Genet. 1997 Sep;6(9):1573-9
pubmed: 9285796
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2014 May;37(3):431-7
pubmed: 24271936
DNA Res. 1996 Aug 31;3(4):269-71
pubmed: 8946167
Diabetes. 2006 May;55(5):1265-9
pubmed: 16644681
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 1;29(7):845-54
pubmed: 23407358
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jan;10(1):43-55
pubmed: 19092835
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Apr 15;1501(1):1-11
pubmed: 10727844
Bioinformation. 2008;3(3):137-8
pubmed: 19238252
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 26;9 Suppl 2:S6
pubmed: 18387208
Mol Biosyst. 2016 Oct 20;12(10):3223-33
pubmed: 27523988
Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov;29(11):1342-54
pubmed: 18951461
Protein Sci. 2010 Apr;19(4):693-702
pubmed: 20095049
Trends Biochem Sci. 1997 Dec;22(12):488-90
pubmed: 9433130
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(Web Server issue):W215-22
pubmed: 21593128
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
pubmed: 10592235
Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2016;102:181-224
pubmed: 26827606
Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 15;24(24):2938-9
pubmed: 18974171
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31677
pubmed: 22384055
Proteins. 1993 Dec;17(4):412-25
pubmed: 8108382
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D793-6
pubmed: 18842627
Drug Metab Dispos. 2009 May;37(5):977-91
pubmed: 19204079
BMC Genomics. 2013;14 Suppl 3:S2
pubmed: 23819846
Biol Direct. 2015 Mar 07;10:8
pubmed: 25886642
Metab Brain Dis. 2018 Apr;33(2):589-600
pubmed: 29047041
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 03;7:329
pubmed: 16817972
Am J Transl Res. 2018 May 15;10(5):1400-1412
pubmed: 29887954
Biochemistry. 1992 Jan 28;31(3):725-32
pubmed: 1731929
Mol Biol Cell. 2015 Jul 15;26(14):2596-608
pubmed: 25995378
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(11):3823-35
pubmed: 17526529
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2014 May;70(Pt 5):1321-35
pubmed: 24816101
J Mol Biol. 2002 Jul 26;320(5):991-1009
pubmed: 12126620
Hum Mutat. 2004 Jun;23(6):559-66
pubmed: 15146460
Nat Genet. 1999 Jul;22(3):231-8
pubmed: 10391209
Metab Brain Dis. 2017 Oct;32(5):1417-1426
pubmed: 28389991
J Cell Biochem. 2017 Jul;118(7):1900-1910
pubmed: 28145583
Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 15;22(22):2729-34
pubmed: 16895930
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 14;12(4):e0174953
pubmed: 28410371
Hum Mutat. 2010 Sep;31(9):1043-9
pubmed: 20556796
Genome Res. 2001 May;11(5):863-74
pubmed: 11337480
Mol Genet Metab. 2001 Aug;73(4):306-12
pubmed: 11509012
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 23;8(4):e61908
pubmed: 23626751
Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Jan;155A(1):58-68
pubmed: 21204211
Nat Methods. 2010 Apr;7(4):248-9
pubmed: 20354512
Hum Mutat. 2009 Aug;30(8):1237-44
pubmed: 19514061
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D247-52
pubmed: 17130144
J Cell Biochem. 2019 Mar;120(3):3491-3505
pubmed: 30281819
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D204-12
pubmed: 25348405
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993;22:381-415
pubmed: 8347995
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008 Apr;31(2):240-52
pubmed: 18392742
BMC Biochem. 2004 Jul 13;5:9
pubmed: 15251041
Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):271-8
pubmed: 7628016
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Feb;4(2):e43
pubmed: 18282091
PLoS Genet. 2008 Aug 29;4(8):e1000183
pubmed: 18769710
J Mol Biol. 2001 Mar 23;307(2):683-706
pubmed: 11254390
Proteins. 2006 Mar 1;62(4):1125-32
pubmed: 16372356
J Biol Chem. 2010 Sep 10;285(37):28741-8
pubmed: 20628052
Chem Biol. 1997 Apr;4(4):259-67
pubmed: 9195866
Ann Neurol. 2010 Dec;68(6):876-87
pubmed: 21061399
Nat Genet. 1995 Dec;11(4):465-7
pubmed: 7493035
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2016;34(1):29-41
pubmed: 25679319
Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan;19(1):163-4
pubmed: 12499312
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2017 Apr;35(5):917-928
pubmed: 27125723
J Cell Biochem. 2018 Sep;119(9):7585-7598
pubmed: 29893426
Hum Mol Genet. 2017 Aug 15;26(16):3105-3115
pubmed: 28535199
Metab Brain Dis. 2018 Dec;33(6):1823-1834
pubmed: 30006696
Metab Brain Dis. 2017 Dec;32(6):2105-2118
pubmed: 28879565
Metab Brain Dis. 2018 Dec;33(6):1835-1847
pubmed: 29978341
Appl Clin Genet. 2015 Nov 25;8:269-81
pubmed: 26648750
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Apr;107:161-171
pubmed: 30831305
Metab Brain Dis. 2017 Feb;32(1):171-177
pubmed: 27531131