Impact of long-term ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who underwent complex percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Global Leaders trial.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ therapy
Aged
Aspirin
/ adverse effects
Case-Control Studies
Cause of Death
/ trends
Drug Therapy, Combination
Drug-Eluting Stents
/ adverse effects
Female
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
/ mortality
Myocardial Revascularization
/ adverse effects
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ methods
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
/ adverse effects
Stroke
/ chemically induced
Ticagrelor
/ adverse effects
Complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Drug-eluting stent
Dual antiplatelet therapy
Ticagrelor monotherapy
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 08 2019
14 08 2019
Historique:
received:
05
04
2019
revised:
09
05
2019
accepted:
07
06
2019
pubmed:
10
8
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
10
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the impact of an experimental strategy [23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)] vs. a reference regimen (12-month aspirin monotherapy following 12-month DAPT) after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the present post hoc analysis of the Global Leaders trial, the primary endpoint [composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI)] at 2 years was assessed in patients with complex PCI, which includes at least one of the following characteristics: multivessel PCI, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation PCI with ≥2 stents, or total stent length >60 mm. In addition, patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) (composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, or any revascularization) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) [composite of POCE or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 3 or 5 bleeding] were explored. Among 15 450 patients included in this analysis, 4570 who underwent complex PCI had a higher risk of ischaemic and bleeding events. In patients with complex PCI, the experimental strategy significantly reduced risks of the primary endpoint [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.85] and POCE (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93), but not in those with non-complex PCI (Pinteraction = 0.015 and 0.017, respectively). The risk of BARC Type 3 or 5 bleeding was comparable (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.67-1.40), resulting in a significant risk reduction in NACE (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.92; Pinteraction = 0.011). Ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month DAPT could provide a net clinical benefit for patients with complex PCI. However, in view of the overall neutral results of the trial, these findings of a post hoc analysis should be considered as hypothesis generating.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31397487
pii: 5545469
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz453
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
0
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2595-2604Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.