Computing Relative Binding Affinity of Ligands to Receptor: An Effective Hybrid Single-Dual-Topology Free-Energy Perturbation Approach in NAMD.
Journal
Journal of chemical information and modeling
ISSN: 1549-960X
Titre abrégé: J Chem Inf Model
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101230060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 09 2019
23 09 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
15
8
2019
medline:
17
9
2020
entrez:
15
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An effective hybrid single-dual-topology protocol is designed for the calculation of relative binding affinities of small ligands to a receptor. The protocol was developed as an extension of the NAMD molecular dynamics program, which exclusively supports a dual-topology framework for relative alchemical free-energy perturbation (FEP) calculations. In this protocol, the alchemical end states are represented as two separate molecules sharing a common substructure identified through maximum structural mapping. Within the substructure, an atom-to-atom correspondence is established, and each pair of corresponding atoms is holonomically constrained to share identical coordinates at all time throughout the simulation. The forces are projected and combined at each step for propagation. Following this formulation, a set of illustrative calculations of reliable experiment/simulation data, including relative solvation free energies of small molecules and relative binding affinities of drug compounds to proteins, are presented. To enhance sampling of the dual-topology region, the FEP calculations were carried out within a replica-exchange MD scheme supported by the multiple-copy algorithm module of NAMD, with periodically attempted swapping of the thermodynamic coupling parameter λ between neighboring states. The results are consistent with experiments and benchmarks reported in the literature, lending support to the validity of the current protocol. In summary, this hybrid single-dual-topology approach combines the conceptual simplicity of the dual-topology paradigm with the advantageous sampling efficiency of the single-topology approach, making it an ideal strategy for high-throughput in silico drug design.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31411473
doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00362
pmc: PMC7007809
mid: NIHMS1551214
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ligands
0
Solvents
0
Phenol
339NCG44TV
Benzene
J64922108F
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3794-3802Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P41 GM104601
Pays : United States
Références
J Comput Chem. 2015 Feb 15;36(5):348-54
pubmed: 25487359
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Jun 27;56(6):1122-6
pubmed: 27214306
J Chem Theory Comput. 2006 Sep;2(5):1255-73
pubmed: 26626834
J Comput Chem. 2017 Jun 5;38(15):1114-1124
pubmed: 27862047
J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Oct 22;58(10):2043-2050
pubmed: 30199633
Biophys J. 2006 Oct 15;91(8):2798-814
pubmed: 16844742
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2005 Nov;19(11):765-70
pubmed: 16365699
J Med Chem. 2013 Jan 10;56(1):15-30
pubmed: 23244564
J Chem Inf Model. 2015 Apr 27;55(4):727-35
pubmed: 25835054
J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Feb 25;137(7):2695-703
pubmed: 25625324
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2007;36:21-42
pubmed: 17201676
J Chem Theory Comput. 2008 Mar;4(3):435-47
pubmed: 26620784
Acc Chem Res. 2009 Jun 16;42(6):724-33
pubmed: 19317443
J Chem Theory Comput. 2007 Sep;3(5):1645-55
pubmed: 26627610
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011 Apr;21(2):150-60
pubmed: 21349700
J Mol Biol. 2007 Aug 24;371(4):1118-34
pubmed: 17599350
J Med Chem. 2008 Feb 28;51(4):769-79
pubmed: 18215013
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002 Jul;16(7):521-33
pubmed: 12510884
J Comput Chem. 2010 Mar;31(4):671-90
pubmed: 19575467
Biochemistry. 1995 Jul 11;34(27):8576-88
pubmed: 7612599
J Comput Chem. 2004 Jan 15;25(1):28-39
pubmed: 14634991
J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 Nov 13;14(11):5567-5582
pubmed: 30289712
J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 Nov 9;6(11):3427-3441
pubmed: 21151738
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Jan 28;53(1):267-77
pubmed: 23205773
Comput Phys Commun. 2014 Mar;185(3):908-916
pubmed: 24944348
J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1781-802
pubmed: 16222654
Nature. 2015 Aug 6;524(7563):79-83
pubmed: 26200342
J Comput Chem. 2009 Jul 30;30(10):1545-614
pubmed: 19444816
J Phys Chem Lett. 2011;2(2):87-92
pubmed: 21572567
J Chem Inf Model. 2015 Dec 28;55(12):2485-90
pubmed: 26544598
J Chem Theory Comput. 2007;3(4):1231-1235
pubmed: 18843379
J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 Mar 13;14(3):1564-1582
pubmed: 29357243
J Chem Theory Comput. 2009 Feb 10;5(2):350-358
pubmed: 20150953
J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Sep 10;9(9):null
pubmed: 24185531
J Chem Phys. 2004 Aug 15;121(7):2904-14
pubmed: 15291601
J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 Jul 1;6(9):2559-2565
pubmed: 21857813
Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1813-8
pubmed: 15031495
Biophys J. 2010 May 19;98(10):2309-16
pubmed: 20483340
Structure. 2009 Apr 15;17(4):489-98
pubmed: 19368882
J Chem Phys. 2006 Aug 28;125(8):084902
pubmed: 16965052
J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1719-51
pubmed: 16211540
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;924:271-311
pubmed: 23034753
J Chem Theory Comput. 2009 Oct 1;5(10):2583-2588
pubmed: 21857812
J Chem Theory Comput. 2016 Sep 13;12(9):4620-31
pubmed: 27462935
J Phys Chem B. 2018 Oct 18;122(41):9435-9442
pubmed: 30253098
Biophys J. 1997 Mar;72(3):1047-69
pubmed: 9138555
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Jan 10;13(1):42-54
pubmed: 27933808