Nonhomologous End Joining Is More Important Than Proton Linear Energy Transfer in Dictating Cell Death.
Calcium-Binding Proteins
/ genetics
Cell Death
/ genetics
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Survival
/ genetics
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
DNA End-Joining Repair
/ physiology
Gene Silencing
Genes, BRCA1
Histones
/ analysis
Homologous Recombination
/ physiology
Humans
Linear Energy Transfer
Mutation
Photons
Protons
Rad51 Recombinase
/ genetics
Radiation Tolerance
/ genetics
Time Factors
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2019
01 12 2019
Historique:
received:
22
03
2019
revised:
03
08
2019
accepted:
08
08
2019
pubmed:
20
8
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
20
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study seeks to identify biological factors that may yield a therapeutic advantage of proton therapy versus photon therapy. Specifically, we address the role of nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) in the survival of cells in response to clinical photon and proton beams. We irradiated HT1080, M059K (DNA-PKcs Our results indicate that NHEJ deficiency is more important in dictating cell survival than proton LET. Cells with disrupted HR through BRCA1 mutation showed increased radiosensitivity only for high-LET protons whereas RAD51 depletion showed increased radiosensitivity for both photons and protons. DNA double strand breaks, assessed by γ-H2AX radiation-induced foci, showed greater numbers after 24 hours in cells exposed to higher LET protons. We also observed that NHEJ-deficient cells were unable to repair the vast majority of double strand breaks after 24 hours. BRCA1 mutation significantly sensitizes cells to protons, but not photons. Loss of NHEJ renders cells hypersensitive to radiation, whereas the relative importance of HR increases with LET across several cell lines. This may be attributable to the more clustered damage induced by higher LET protons, which are harder to repair through NHEJ. This highlights the importance of tumor biology in dictating treatment modality and suggests BRCA1 as a potential biomarker for proton therapy response. Our data also support the use of pharmacologic inhibitors of DNA repair to enhance the sensitivity to different radiation types, although this raises issues for normal tissue toxicity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31425731
pii: S0360-3016(19)33645-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.011
pmc: PMC6872929
mid: NIHMS1537632
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
CIB1 protein, human
0
Calcium-Binding Proteins
0
H2AX protein, human
0
Histones
0
Protons
0
RAD51 protein, human
EC 2.7.7.-
Rad51 Recombinase
EC 2.7.7.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1119-1125Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG053341
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jan 1;88(1):175-81
pubmed: 24239385
Oncol Rep. 2012 Nov;28(5):1591-6
pubmed: 22923057
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8293-8
pubmed: 21527720
Cancers (Basel). 2017 Jul 18;9(7):null
pubmed: 28718816
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 May 5;45(8):4590-4605
pubmed: 28334891
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Oct;101(1):7-12
pubmed: 21737170
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Apr 1;103(5):1182-1183
pubmed: 30529372
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:45161
pubmed: 28345622
Radiat Res. 1993 Jun;134(3):349-54
pubmed: 8316628
Radiat Res. 2014 Sep;182(3):338-44
pubmed: 25117625
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Sep;116(3):374-80
pubmed: 26320609
Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Jan;16(1):20-33
pubmed: 26678314
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017 Aug;18(8):495-506
pubmed: 28512351
Nature. 2017 Aug 24;548(7668):461-465
pubmed: 28738408
J Clin Invest. 2016 Aug 1;126(8):3145-57
pubmed: 27454289
Nature. 2017 Aug 24;548(7668):466-470
pubmed: 28759889
Mutat Res. 2017 Oct;803-805:51-55
pubmed: 28781144
Cell Rep. 2017 Jan 10;18(2):520-532
pubmed: 28076794
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Oct;121(1):154-161
pubmed: 27637859
Oncol Lett. 2015 Nov;10(5):2828-2834
pubmed: 26722249
Science. 1995 Feb 24;267(5201):1183-5
pubmed: 7855602
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 21;109(34):13650-5
pubmed: 22869732
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Mar 1;100(3):776-784
pubmed: 29413288
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Apr 1;91(5):1081-9
pubmed: 25832698
J Radiat Res. 2008 May;49(3):203-10
pubmed: 18413977
Nat Cell Biol. 2016 Dec 23;19(1):1-9
pubmed: 28008184
Mol Cancer Res. 2007 Jan;5(1):35-45
pubmed: 17259345
Radiat Res. 2015 Mar;183(3):345-56
pubmed: 25738894
Mol Cell. 2017 Feb 16;65(4):671-684.e5
pubmed: 28132842
Mol Cell. 1999 Dec;4(6):1093-9
pubmed: 10635334
Trends Biochem Sci. 2017 Sep;42(9):690-701
pubmed: 28739276
DNA Repair (Amst). 2008 May 3;7(5):725-33
pubmed: 18325854
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jul 3;12(1):111
pubmed: 28673358
Radiat Res. 2006 Jan;165(1):59-67
pubmed: 16392963
Cell Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):99-113
pubmed: 18166982