Visibility of the hilar lymph nodes using advanced virtual monoenergetic low-keV images for preoperative evaluation of lung cancer.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes
/ drug effects
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Multidetector Computed Tomography
/ methods
Preoperative Care
/ methods
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
21
8
2019
medline:
30
10
2019
entrez:
21
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the visibility of the hilar lymph nodes (LNs) using advanced virtual monoenergetic low-keV images compared with early-phase contrast-enhanced CT. Dual energy contrast-enhanced CT was performed for pre-operative evaluation of lung cancer at 20 and 60 s after administration of contrast media in 50 patients (32 males and 18 females; mean age, 69 years). Five kinds of images (A: 20 s/120 kV; B: 60 s/40 keV; C: 60 s/50 keV; D: 60 s/120 kV; E: 60 s/100 kV) were reconstructed. We measured the CT number of the bilateral main pulmonary arteries (PAs), pulmonary veins (PVs) and hilar LNs, and evaluated the differences in CT number (Hounsfield units, HUs) between the PA/PV and LNs (PA The mean PA To evaluate the hilar LNs with a single image series, advanced virtual monoenergetic 40-keV imaging at the delayed 60-s phase seems to be the most valuable. Advanced virtual monoenergetic image is useful for evaluation of both hilar LNs and tumors in the delayed phase without artifact derived from the streak artifact from dense contrast media in the SVC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31430185
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180734
pmc: PMC6849687
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20180734Références
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Dec;84(12):2368-79
pubmed: 26116077
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5 Suppl):S9-S15
pubmed: 23097173
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Jan;29(1):26-9
pubmed: 16337397
Radiographics. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):1037-55
pubmed: 20631367
Chest. 2000 Mar;117(3):773-8
pubmed: 10713005
Radiology. 2015 Sep;276(3):637-53
pubmed: 26302388
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Feb;83(2):322-8
pubmed: 24361061
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Apr;89:129-135
pubmed: 28267528
Invest Radiol. 2014 Sep;49(9):586-92
pubmed: 24710203
Br J Radiol. 2018 Dec;91(1092):20180509
pubmed: 30160182
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jun;85(6):1219-23
pubmed: 27161073
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec;68(3):362-8
pubmed: 18842371
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Apr;85(4):695-9
pubmed: 26971410
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Mar;85(3):665-72
pubmed: 26860682
Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug;19(8):1003-10
pubmed: 22621917
Clin Radiol. 2015 Nov;70(11):1244-51
pubmed: 26231468
J Thorac Imaging. 2011 Feb;26(1):42-7
pubmed: 20463614
Radiographics. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):1679-91
pubmed: 15537976
Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):256-66
pubmed: 23319663