Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study.


Journal

Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 10 2019
Historique:
received: 19 03 2019
revised: 17 06 2019
accepted: 19 06 2019
pubmed: 27 8 2019
medline: 24 10 2019
entrez: 27 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Guideline-recommended doses of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), and β blockers are similar for men and women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), even though there are known sex differences in pharmacokinetics of these drugs. We hypothesised that there might be sex differences in the optimal dose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers in patients with HFrEF. We did a post-hoc analysis of BIOSTAT-CHF, a prospective study in 11 European countries of patients with heart failure in whom initiation and up-titration of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers was encouraged by protocol. We included only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, and excluded those who died within the first 3 months. Primary outcome was a composite of time to all-cause mortality or hospitalisation for heart failure. Findings were validated in ASIAN-HF, an independent cohort of 3539 men and 961 women with HFrEF. Among 1308 men and 402 women with HFrEF from BIOSTAT-CHF, women were older (74 [12] years vs 70 [12] years, p<0·0001) and had lower bodyweights (72 [16] kg vs 85 [18] kg, p<0·0001) and heights (162 [7] cm vs 174 [8] cm, p<0·0001) than did men, although body-mass index did not differ significantly. A similar number of men and women reached guideline-recommended target doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs (99 [25%] vs 304 [23%], p=0·61) and β blockers (57 [14%] vs 168 [13%], p=0·54). In men, the lowest hazards of death or hospitalisation for heart failure occurred at 100% of the recommended dose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers, but women showed approximately 30% lower risk at only 50% of the recommended doses, with no further decrease in risk at higher dose levels. These sex differences were still present after adjusting for clinical covariates, including age and body surface area. In the ASIAN-HF registry, similar patterns were observed for both ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers, with women having approximately 30% lower risk at 50% of the recommended doses, with no further benefit at higher dose levels. This study suggests that women with HFrEF might need lower doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers than men, and brings into question what the true optimal medical therapy is for women versus men. European Commission.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Guideline-recommended doses of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), and β blockers are similar for men and women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), even though there are known sex differences in pharmacokinetics of these drugs. We hypothesised that there might be sex differences in the optimal dose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers in patients with HFrEF.
METHODS
We did a post-hoc analysis of BIOSTAT-CHF, a prospective study in 11 European countries of patients with heart failure in whom initiation and up-titration of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers was encouraged by protocol. We included only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, and excluded those who died within the first 3 months. Primary outcome was a composite of time to all-cause mortality or hospitalisation for heart failure. Findings were validated in ASIAN-HF, an independent cohort of 3539 men and 961 women with HFrEF.
FINDINGS
Among 1308 men and 402 women with HFrEF from BIOSTAT-CHF, women were older (74 [12] years vs 70 [12] years, p<0·0001) and had lower bodyweights (72 [16] kg vs 85 [18] kg, p<0·0001) and heights (162 [7] cm vs 174 [8] cm, p<0·0001) than did men, although body-mass index did not differ significantly. A similar number of men and women reached guideline-recommended target doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs (99 [25%] vs 304 [23%], p=0·61) and β blockers (57 [14%] vs 168 [13%], p=0·54). In men, the lowest hazards of death or hospitalisation for heart failure occurred at 100% of the recommended dose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers, but women showed approximately 30% lower risk at only 50% of the recommended doses, with no further decrease in risk at higher dose levels. These sex differences were still present after adjusting for clinical covariates, including age and body surface area. In the ASIAN-HF registry, similar patterns were observed for both ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers, with women having approximately 30% lower risk at 50% of the recommended doses, with no further benefit at higher dose levels.
INTERPRETATION
This study suggests that women with HFrEF might need lower doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers than men, and brings into question what the true optimal medical therapy is for women versus men.
FUNDING
European Commission.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31447116
pii: S0140-6736(19)31792-1
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-1
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists 0
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists 0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1254-1263

Investigateurs

Arthur Mark Richards (AM)
Carolyn S P Lam (CSP)
Inder Anand (I)
Chung-Lieh Hung (CL)
Lieng Hsi Ling (LH)
Houng Bang Liew (HB)
Calambur Narasimhan (C)
Tachapong Ngarmukos (T)
Sang Weon Park (SW)
Eugenio Reyes (E)
Bambang Budi Siswanto (BB)
Wataru Shimizu (W)
Shu Zhang (S)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Bernadet T Santema (BT)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Wouter Ouwerkerk (W)

National Heart Centre Singapore, Hospital Drive, Singapore; Deptartment of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Jasper Tromp (J)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; National Heart Centre Singapore, Hospital Drive, Singapore.

Iziah E Sama (IE)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Alice Ravera (A)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Institute of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Vera Regitz-Zagrosek (V)

Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Institute for Gender in Medicine, Centre for Cardiovascular Research, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Berlin, Germany.

Hans Hillege (H)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Nilesh J Samani (NJ)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.

Faiez Zannad (F)

Clinical Investigation Center 1433, French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, Investigation Network Initiative-Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists, Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire de Nancy, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.

Kenneth Dickstein (K)

Department of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.

Chim C Lang (CC)

School of Medicine Centre for Cardiovascular and Lung Biology, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK.

John G Cleland (JG)

National Heart & Lung Institute, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Imperial College, London, UK; Robertson Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Jozine M Ter Maaten (JM)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Marco Metra (M)

Institute of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Stefan D Anker (SD)

German Centre for Cardiovascular Research partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

Pim van der Harst (P)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Leong L Ng (LL)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.

Peter van der Meer (P)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Dirk J van Veldhuisen (DJ)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Sven Meyer (S)

Heart Center Oldenburg, Department of Cardiology, European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Carolyn S P Lam (CSP)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; National Heart Centre Singapore, Hospital Drive, Singapore.

Adriaan A Voors (AA)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. Electronic address: a.a.voors@umcg.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH