Differential dynamics of microbial community networks help identify microorganisms interacting with residue-borne pathogens: the case of Zymoseptoria tritici in wheat.


Journal

Microbiome
ISSN: 2049-2618
Titre abrégé: Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101615147

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 08 2019
Historique:
received: 15 04 2019
accepted: 16 08 2019
entrez: 1 9 2019
pubmed: 1 9 2019
medline: 27 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Wheat residues are a crucial determinant of the epidemiology of Septoria tritici blotch, as they support the sexual reproduction of the causal agent Zymoseptoria tritici. We aimed to characterize the effect of infection with this fungal pathogen on the microbial communities present on wheat residues and to identify microorganisms interacting with it. We used metabarcoding to characterize the microbiome associated with wheat residues placed outdoors, with and without preliminary Z. tritici inoculation, comparing the first set of residues in contact with the soil and a second set without contact with the soil, on four sampling dates in two consecutive years. The diversity of the tested conditions, leading to the establishment of different microbial communities according to the origins of the constitutive taxa (plant only, or plant and soil), highlighted the effect of Z. tritici on the wheat residue microbiome. Several microorganisms were affected by Z. tritici infection, even after the disappearance of the pathogen. Linear discriminant analyses and ecological network analyses were combined to describe the communities affected by the infection. The number of fungi and bacteria promoted or inhibited by inoculation with Z. tritici decreased over time and was smaller for residues in contact with the soil. The interactions between the pathogen and other microorganisms appeared to be mostly indirect, despite the strong position of the pathogen as a keystone taxon in networks. Direct interactions with other members of the communities mostly involved fungi, including other wheat pathogens. Our results provide essential information about the alterations to the microbial community in wheat residues induced by the mere presence of a fungal pathogen, and vice versa. Species already described as beneficial or biocontrol agents were found to be affected by pathogen inoculation. The strategy developed here can be viewed as a proof-of-concept focusing on crop residues as a particularly rich ecological compartment, with a high diversity of fungal and bacterial taxa originating from both the plant and soil compartments, and for Z. tritici-wheat as a model pathosystem. By revealing putative antagonistic interactions, this study paves the way for improving the biological control of residue-borne diseases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Wheat residues are a crucial determinant of the epidemiology of Septoria tritici blotch, as they support the sexual reproduction of the causal agent Zymoseptoria tritici. We aimed to characterize the effect of infection with this fungal pathogen on the microbial communities present on wheat residues and to identify microorganisms interacting with it. We used metabarcoding to characterize the microbiome associated with wheat residues placed outdoors, with and without preliminary Z. tritici inoculation, comparing the first set of residues in contact with the soil and a second set without contact with the soil, on four sampling dates in two consecutive years.
RESULTS
The diversity of the tested conditions, leading to the establishment of different microbial communities according to the origins of the constitutive taxa (plant only, or plant and soil), highlighted the effect of Z. tritici on the wheat residue microbiome. Several microorganisms were affected by Z. tritici infection, even after the disappearance of the pathogen. Linear discriminant analyses and ecological network analyses were combined to describe the communities affected by the infection. The number of fungi and bacteria promoted or inhibited by inoculation with Z. tritici decreased over time and was smaller for residues in contact with the soil. The interactions between the pathogen and other microorganisms appeared to be mostly indirect, despite the strong position of the pathogen as a keystone taxon in networks. Direct interactions with other members of the communities mostly involved fungi, including other wheat pathogens. Our results provide essential information about the alterations to the microbial community in wheat residues induced by the mere presence of a fungal pathogen, and vice versa. Species already described as beneficial or biocontrol agents were found to be affected by pathogen inoculation.
CONCLUSIONS
The strategy developed here can be viewed as a proof-of-concept focusing on crop residues as a particularly rich ecological compartment, with a high diversity of fungal and bacterial taxa originating from both the plant and soil compartments, and for Z. tritici-wheat as a model pathosystem. By revealing putative antagonistic interactions, this study paves the way for improving the biological control of residue-borne diseases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31470910
doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0736-0
pii: 10.1186/s40168-019-0736-0
pmc: PMC6717385
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

125

Références

Microb Ecol. 2019 Jan;77(1):110-123
pubmed: 29876608
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217
pubmed: 23630581
Nat Plants. 2018 May;4(5):247-257
pubmed: 29725101
Plant Dis. 2001 Sep;85(9):977-984
pubmed: 30823113
Fungal Genet Biol. 2015 Jun;79:3-7
pubmed: 26092782
J Exp Bot. 2001 Mar;52(Spec Issue):487-511
pubmed: 11326055
Phytopathology. 2009 Jan;99(1):109-15
pubmed: 19055442
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
pubmed: 14597658
Microb Ecol. 2019 May;77(4):931-945
pubmed: 30834960
New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):281-5
pubmed: 20409185
Phytopathology. 2017 Nov;107(11):1284-1297
pubmed: 28650266
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 25;14(2):e0204195
pubmed: 30802246
New Phytol. 2009 Oct;184(2):449-456
pubmed: 19703112
Front Microbiol. 2017 Jan 20;8:41
pubmed: 28163703
J Exp Bot. 2016 Feb;67(4):995-1002
pubmed: 26547794
Front Microbiol. 2014 May 20;5:219
pubmed: 24904535
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2002;40:309-48
pubmed: 12147763
New Phytol. 1999 Dec;144(3):489-497
pubmed: 33862864
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11512-9
pubmed: 18695234
ISME J. 2018 Jun;12(6):1496-1507
pubmed: 29520025
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004 Mar;17(3):304-12
pubmed: 15000397
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Jul;64(7):681-4
pubmed: 18366065
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Mar;32(3):49
pubmed: 26873560
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528
pubmed: 30016406
Microbiome. 2018 Jan 15;6(1):12
pubmed: 29335027
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 May 07;11(5):e1004226
pubmed: 25950956
J Appl Microbiol. 2015 May;118(5):1165-79
pubmed: 25692943
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
Fungal Genet Biol. 2002 Apr;35(3):277-86
pubmed: 11929216
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Mar 13;13(4):260-70
pubmed: 22411464
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004;42:271-309
pubmed: 15283668
Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):478-86
pubmed: 22564542
Front Plant Sci. 2016 May 31;7:742
pubmed: 27303429
Phytopathology. 2016 Oct;106(10):1083-1096
pubmed: 27482625
Genome Biol. 2011 Jun 24;12(6):R60
pubmed: 21702898
Plant Dis. 2013 Nov;97(11):1511
pubmed: 30708482
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D141-5
pubmed: 19004872
New Phytol. 2007;174(3):637-647
pubmed: 17447918
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Aug 06;6:573
pubmed: 26300892
Front Microbiol. 2019 Feb 18;10:261
pubmed: 30833940
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014 Mar 05;4:29
pubmed: 24634890
Microb Ecol. 2010 Nov;60(4):816-28
pubmed: 20593174
Persoonia. 2011 Jun;26:57-69
pubmed: 22025804
Microb Ecol. 2016 Nov;72(4):870-880
pubmed: 27147439
New Phytol. 2016 May;210(3):1033-43
pubmed: 26725246
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017 Mar;30(3):190-193
pubmed: 28051350
Plant Dis. 2016 Feb;100(2):483-489
pubmed: 30694133

Auteurs

Lydie Kerdraon (L)

UMR BIOGER, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France. lydiekerdraon@gmail.com.

Matthieu Barret (M)

UMR IRHS, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, Université d'Angers, 49071, Beaucouzé, France.

Valérie Laval (V)

UMR BIOGER, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France.

Frédéric Suffert (F)

UMR BIOGER, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France. frederic.suffert@inra.fr.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Aerosols Humans Decontamination Air Microbiology Masks
Coal Metagenome Phylogeny Bacteria Genome, Bacterial
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages

Classifications MeSH