What factors influence midwives to provide obstetric high dependency care on the delivery suite or request care be escalated away from the obstetric unit? Findings of a focus group study.


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 04 02 2019
accepted: 30 08 2019
entrez: 11 9 2019
pubmed: 11 9 2019
medline: 23 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the United Kingdom, midwives will engage in discussions with the multidisciplinary team as to whether they can provide Obstetric High Dependency Care (OHDC) on the Delivery Suite or whether a woman's care should be escalated to the critical care team. This study aimed to explore the question: What factors influence midwives to provide OHDC or request care be escalated away from the obstetric unit in hospitals remote from tertiary referral centres? Focus groups were undertaken with midwives (n = 34) across three obstetric units in England, with annual birth rates ranging from 1500 to 5000 per annum, in District General Hospitals. Three scenarios in the form of video vignettes of handover were used as triggers for the focus groups. Scenario 1; severe pre-eclampsia, physiologically unstable 2; major postpartum haemorrhage requiring invasive monitoring 3; recent admission of woman with chest pain receiving facial oxygen and requiring continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Two focus groups were conducted in each of the obstetric units with experienced midwives. Data were analysed using a qualitative framework approach. Factors influencing midwives' care escalation decisions included the care environment, a woman's diagnosis and fetal or neonatal factors. The overall plan of care including the need for ECG and invasive monitoring were also influential factors. Midwives in the smallest obstetric unit did not have access to the facilities for OHDC provision. Midwives in the larger obstetric units provided OHDC but identified varying degrees of skill and sometimes used 'workarounds' to facilitate care provision. Midwifery staffing levels, skill mix and workload were also influential. Some differences of opinion were evident between midwives working in the same obstetric units as to whether OHDC could be provided and the support they would enlist to help them provide it. Reliance on clinical guidelines appeared variable. Findings indicate that there may be inequitable OHDC provision at a local level. Organisationally robust systems are required to promote safe, equitable OHDC care including skills development for midwives and precise escalation guidelines to minimise workarounds. Training for midwives must include strategies that prevent skills fade.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In the United Kingdom, midwives will engage in discussions with the multidisciplinary team as to whether they can provide Obstetric High Dependency Care (OHDC) on the Delivery Suite or whether a woman's care should be escalated to the critical care team. This study aimed to explore the question: What factors influence midwives to provide OHDC or request care be escalated away from the obstetric unit in hospitals remote from tertiary referral centres?
METHODS METHODS
Focus groups were undertaken with midwives (n = 34) across three obstetric units in England, with annual birth rates ranging from 1500 to 5000 per annum, in District General Hospitals. Three scenarios in the form of video vignettes of handover were used as triggers for the focus groups. Scenario 1; severe pre-eclampsia, physiologically unstable 2; major postpartum haemorrhage requiring invasive monitoring 3; recent admission of woman with chest pain receiving facial oxygen and requiring continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Two focus groups were conducted in each of the obstetric units with experienced midwives. Data were analysed using a qualitative framework approach.
RESULTS RESULTS
Factors influencing midwives' care escalation decisions included the care environment, a woman's diagnosis and fetal or neonatal factors. The overall plan of care including the need for ECG and invasive monitoring were also influential factors. Midwives in the smallest obstetric unit did not have access to the facilities for OHDC provision. Midwives in the larger obstetric units provided OHDC but identified varying degrees of skill and sometimes used 'workarounds' to facilitate care provision. Midwifery staffing levels, skill mix and workload were also influential. Some differences of opinion were evident between midwives working in the same obstetric units as to whether OHDC could be provided and the support they would enlist to help them provide it. Reliance on clinical guidelines appeared variable.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Findings indicate that there may be inequitable OHDC provision at a local level. Organisationally robust systems are required to promote safe, equitable OHDC care including skills development for midwives and precise escalation guidelines to minimise workarounds. Training for midwives must include strategies that prevent skills fade.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31500580
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2487-0
pii: 10.1186/s12884-019-2487-0
pmc: PMC6734275
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

331

Références

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Nov;42(6):723-9
pubmed: 25342404
West J Nurs Res. 2003 Aug;25(5):508-18
pubmed: 12955968
Open Access Emerg Med. 2013 Dec 18;6:1-7
pubmed: 27147872
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Apr 19;142(8):627-30
pubmed: 15838069
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2010 May-Jun;26(3):E1-7
pubmed: 20508418
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000 Oct;16(5):310-8
pubmed: 11000605
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Oct;19(4):353-5
pubmed: 20832283
Midwifery. 2017 Apr;47:1-7
pubmed: 28188998
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb;21(2):135-44
pubmed: 21972419
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R87
pubmed: 20470381
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):417-25
pubmed: 23460099
J Clin Nurs. 1996 Jul;5(4):207-12
pubmed: 8718052
Crit Care. 2015 Jun 12;19:254
pubmed: 26070457
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Jan;21(1):99-100
pubmed: 22154498
Int J Obstet Anesth. 1997 Jul;6(3):156-60
pubmed: 15321274
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;22(5):885-98
pubmed: 18675595
Anaesthesia. 2005 Jun;60(6):547-53
pubmed: 15918825
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Oct;21(4):291-3
pubmed: 22858043
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 11;13:175
pubmed: 23663305
Surgery. 2015 Apr;157(4):752-63
pubmed: 25794627
Anaesthesia. 2000 Dec;55(12):1155-8
pubmed: 11121922
Nurs Crit Care. 2013 Sep;18(5):251-7
pubmed: 23968444
Surgery. 2014 Jun;155(6):989-94
pubmed: 24768480
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;22(5):899-916
pubmed: 18693140
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Aug;24(3):203-6
pubmed: 26142499
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan;23(1):26-34
pubmed: 23868867
Aust Crit Care. 2007 Aug;20(3):100-5
pubmed: 17627836
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):791-4
pubmed: 10720370
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2007 Feb;23(1):15-22
pubmed: 16949289
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Dec;27(6):803-9
pubmed: 23972289
Anesth Analg. 2004 Feb;98(2):437-442
pubmed: 14742384
Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1081-6
pubmed: 18821887
Nurs Crit Care. 2006 Jan-Feb;11(1):42-51
pubmed: 16471297
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Jul;26(1):203-8
pubmed: 9231296
J Hosp Med. 2011 Oct;6(8):475-9
pubmed: 21853529
Midwifery. 2013 Oct;29(10):1211-21
pubmed: 23769757
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Jun;20(11-12):1768-75
pubmed: 20958805
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;15(1):46-54
pubmed: 19239581
Anaesthesia. 2012 Jan;67(1):12-18
pubmed: 22066604
Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5
pubmed: 3640358
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jan;24(1-2):90-100
pubmed: 24898949
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Apr;15(3):348-56
pubmed: 17359435
BJOG. 2011 Mar;118 Suppl 1:1-203
pubmed: 21356004
J Emerg Nurs. 2010 Mar;36(2):134-9
pubmed: 20211405

Auteurs

Alison James (A)

Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK. alison.james@plymouth.ac.uk.

Simon Cooper (S)

School of Nursing and Healthcare Professions, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia.

Elizabeth Stenhouse (E)

Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.

Ruth Endacott (R)

Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH