Effect of Corticosteroid-Sparing Treatment With Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Methotrexate on Inflammation in Patients With Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.


Journal

JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 09 2019
Historique:
entrez: 11 9 2019
pubmed: 11 9 2019
medline: 27 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are commonly used immunomodulatory therapies for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious uveitis, but there is uncertainty about which drug is more effective. To compare the effect of methotrexate and mycophenolate for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. The First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial screened 265 adults with noninfectious uveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy from 9 referral eye centers in India, the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and Mexico between August 22, 2013, and August 16, 2017. Follow-up ended on August 20, 2018. Patients were randomized to receive oral methotrexate, 25 mg weekly (n = 107), or oral mycophenolate mofetil, 3 g daily (n = 109). The primary outcome was treatment success at 6 months, which was defined as having control of inflammation in both eyes, no more than 7.5 mg prednisone daily and less than or equal to 2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1%, and no treatment failure due to safety or intolerability. Patients underwent follow-up to 12 months while receiving the same treatment or switched to the other antimetabolite, depending on their 6-month outcome. Among 216 patients who were randomized (median age, 38 years; 135 (62.5%) women), 194 (89.8%) completed follow-up through 6 months. Treatment success occurred in 64 (66.7%) patients in the methotrexate group vs 56 (57.1%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 9.5% [95% CI, -5.3% to 21.8%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.50 [95% CI, 0.81 to 2.81]; P = .20). Among patients with posterior uveitis or panuveitis, treatment success was achieved in 58 (74.4%) in the methotrexate group vs 42 (55.3%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 19.1% [95% CI, 3.6% to 30.6%]; OR, 2.35 [95% CI, 1.16 to 4.90]; P = .02); whereas among patients with intermediate uveitis treatment success occurred in 6 (33.3%) in the methotrexate group vs 14 (63.6%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, -30.3% [95% CI, -51.6% to 1.1%]; OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.08 to 1.05]; P = .07; P for interaction = .004). Elevated liver enzymes were the most common nonserious laboratory adverse event, occurring in 14 patients (13.0%) in the methotrexate group and 8 patients (7.4%) in the mycophenolate group. Among adults with noninfectious uveitis, the use of mycophenolate mofetil compared with methotrexate as first-line corticosteroid-sparing treatment did not result in superior control of inflammation. Further research is needed to determine if either drug is more effective based on the anatomical subtype of uveitis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01829295.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31503307
pii: 2749597
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12618
pmc: PMC6737523
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Inflammatory Agents 0
Enzyme Inhibitors 0
Immunosuppressive Agents 0
Prednisolone 9PHQ9Y1OLM
Mycophenolic Acid HU9DX48N0T
Methotrexate YL5FZ2Y5U1

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01829295']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Equivalence Trial Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

936-945

Subventions

Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : P30 EY002162
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY021125
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Références

Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Oct;130(4):492-513
pubmed: 11024423
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2001 Mar;9(1):35-40
pubmed: 11262666
Ophthalmology. 2003 May;110(5):1061-5
pubmed: 12750115
Ophthalmology. 1992 Sep;99(9):1419-23
pubmed: 1407973
Ger J Ophthalmol. 1992;1(3-4):142-4
pubmed: 1483126
Ophthalmology. 2004 Mar;111(3):491-500; discussion 500
pubmed: 15019324
J Rheumatol. 2005 Feb;32(2):362-5
pubmed: 15693100
Ophthalmology. 2005 Aug;112(8):1472-7
pubmed: 16061096
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;140(3):509-16
pubmed: 16196117
Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1416-21, 1421.e1
pubmed: 18221998
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;146(5):752-60, 760.e1-3
pubmed: 18455143
Ophthalmology. 2008 Oct;115(10):1826-32
pubmed: 18579209
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;146(6):813-8.e1
pubmed: 18687418
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2188-98.e1
pubmed: 19748676
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;149(3):423-32.e1-2
pubmed: 20042178
N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 17;365(20):1886-95
pubmed: 22087680
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Aug;73(8):1549-51
pubmed: 24728329
Ophthalmology. 2014 Oct;121(10):1863-70
pubmed: 24917273
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;160(6):1133-1141.e9
pubmed: 26386159
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jan;68(1):1-25
pubmed: 26545825
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 8;375(10):932-43
pubmed: 27602665
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977
pubmed: 28264816
Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):193-202
pubmed: 28942074
Ophthalmology. 2018 May;125(5):757-773
pubmed: 29310963
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Oct;70(10):1533-1543
pubmed: 29790291
Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Sep;80(9):844-8
pubmed: 8962842
Ophthalmology. 1999 Jan;106(1):111-8
pubmed: 9917790

Auteurs

S R Rathinam (SR)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India.

John A Gonzales (JA)

F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.

Radhika Thundikandy (R)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India.

Anuradha Kanakath (A)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Coimbatore, India.

S Bala Murugan (SB)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, India.

R Vedhanayaki (R)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India.

Lyndell L Lim (LL)

Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.

Eric B Suhler (EB)

Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon.
Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon.

Hassan A Al-Dhibi (HA)

Division of Vitreoretinal Surgery and Uveitis, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Thuy Doan (T)

F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.

Jeremy D Keenan (JD)

F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.

Maya M Rao (MM)

F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Caleb D Ebert (CD)

F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Hieu H Nguyen (HH)

F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Eric Kim (E)

F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Travis C Porco (TC)

F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

Nisha R Acharya (NR)

F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH