Twist1 Inactivation in Dmp1-Expressing Cells Increases Bone Mass but Does Not Affect the Anabolic Response to Sclerostin Neutralization.
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Animals
Antibodies, Neutralizing
/ pharmacology
Bone Density
Extracellular Matrix Proteins
/ biosynthesis
Female
Femur
/ metabolism
Gene Deletion
Male
Mice
Mice, Transgenic
Osteoblasts
/ metabolism
Osteocytes
/ metabolism
Osteogenesis
Twist-Related Protein 1
/ deficiency
X-Ray Microtomography
Twist1
Wnt
mechanotransduction
osteocytes
osteoporosis
sclerostin
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2019
09 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
30
07
2019
revised:
28
08
2019
accepted:
31
08
2019
entrez:
12
9
2019
pubmed:
12
9
2019
medline:
31
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Wnt signaling plays a major role in bone metabolism. Advances in our understanding of secreted regulators of Wnt have yielded several therapeutic targets to stimulate osteoanabolism-the most promising of which is the Wnt inhibitor sclerostin. Sclerostin antibody recently gained approval for clinical use to treat osteoporosis, but the biology surrounding sclerostin antagonism is still incompletely understood. Numerous factors regulate the efficacy of sclerostin inhibition on bone formation, a process known as self-regulation. In previous communications we reported that the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Twist1-a gene know to regulate skeletal development-is highly upregulated among the osteocyte cell population in mice treated with sclerostin antibody. In this communication, we tested the hypothesis that preventing Twist1 upregulation by deletion of Twist1 from late-stage osteoblasts and osteocytes would increase the efficacy of sclerostin antibody treatment, since Twist1 is known to restrain osteoblast activity in many models. Twist1-floxed loss-of-function mice were crossed to the Dmp1-Cre driver to delete Twist1 in Dmp1-expressing cells. Conditional Twist1 deletion was associated with a mild but significant increase in bone mass, as assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and microCT (µCT) for many endpoints in both male and female mice. Biomechanical properties of the femur were not affected by conditional mutation of Twist1. Sclerostin antibody improved all bone properties significantly, regardless of Twist1 status, sex, or endpoint examined. No interactions were detected when Twist1 status and antibody treatment were examined together, suggesting that Twist1 upregulation in the osteocyte population is not an endogenous mechanism that restrains the osteoanabolic effect of sclerostin antibody treatment. In summary, Twist1 inhibition in the late-stage osteoblast/osteocyte increases bone mass but does not affect the anabolic response to sclerostin neutralization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31505764
pii: ijms20184427
doi: 10.3390/ijms20184427
pmc: PMC6769567
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
0
Antibodies, Neutralizing
0
Dmp1 protein, mouse
0
Extracellular Matrix Proteins
0
Sost protein, mouse
0
Twist-Related Protein 1
0
Twist1 protein, mouse
136253-27-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : BLRD VA
ID : I01 BX001478
Pays : United States
Organisme : BLRD VA
ID : IK6 BX003783
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : P01 HL134599
Pays : United States
Références
Front Physiol. 2018 Oct 15;9:1426
pubmed: 30374308
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94607
pubmed: 24736728
Bone. 1993 Jul-Aug;14(4):595-608
pubmed: 8274302
J Cell Biochem. 2012 Jan;113(1):70-9
pubmed: 21866569
Adv Dent Res. 2011 Jul;23(3):280-4
pubmed: 21677079
J Biol Chem. 2011 Jun 3;286(22):19489-500
pubmed: 21471202
J Clin Invest. 2001 May;107(9):1153-61
pubmed: 11342579
Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Nov;21(21):7416-28
pubmed: 11585922
J Cell Biochem. 2010 Aug 1;110(5):1147-54
pubmed: 20564211
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 20;375(16):1532-1543
pubmed: 27641143
Nat Commun. 2016 May 27;7:11505
pubmed: 27230681
Nat Med. 2011 Jun;17(6):684-91
pubmed: 21602802
Genesis. 2007 Sep;45(9):588-92
pubmed: 17868088
Genes Dev. 1995 Mar 15;9(6):686-99
pubmed: 7729687
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 27;9(6):e99331
pubmed: 24971743
J Intern Med. 2019 Apr;285(4):381-394
pubmed: 30657216
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;85(6):1084-1094
pubmed: 30218587
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Jan;70(1):11-9
pubmed: 11741193
JCI Insight. 2018 Jun 7;3(11):
pubmed: 29875318
Bone. 2011 Mar 1;48(3):543-51
pubmed: 21095247
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Nov 13;5(211):211ra158
pubmed: 24225945
J Biol Chem. 2008 Feb 29;283(9):5866-75
pubmed: 18089564
Dent J (Basel). 2018 Oct 17;6(4):null
pubmed: 30336637
Bone. 2016 Mar;84:148-159
pubmed: 26721737
Dev Biol. 2010 Nov 1;347(1):133-46
pubmed: 20732316
Hum Mutat. 2000;15(2):150-5
pubmed: 10649491
Nat Genet. 1999 Jan;21(1):70-1
pubmed: 9916792
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Jul;25(7):1468-86
pubmed: 20533309
Drug Discov Today. 2013 Jul;18(13-14):637-43
pubmed: 23579167
J Dent Res. 2007 Apr;86(4):320-5
pubmed: 17384025
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Aug;30(8):1457-67
pubmed: 25678055
Dev Cell. 2004 Mar;6(3):423-35
pubmed: 15030764
Bone Rep. 2018 Mar 15;8:95-103
pubmed: 29955627
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Nov;25(11):2427-37
pubmed: 20533302
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Sep;25(9):1897-904
pubmed: 20564241
Mol Cancer Res. 2017 Dec;15(12):1764-1776
pubmed: 28851812
Oncogene. 2019 Jan;38(5):656-670
pubmed: 30171258
J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Apr;24(4):578-88
pubmed: 19049336
Nat Med. 2007 Feb;13(2):156-63
pubmed: 17237793