Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of EPDS and BDI-II as a screening tool for antenatal depression: evidence from Qatar.
Adolescent
Adult
Depression
/ diagnosis
Female
Humans
Interview, Psychological
/ methods
Mass Screening
/ methods
Middle Aged
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
/ diagnosis
Pregnant Women
/ psychology
Prenatal Care
/ methods
Prenatal Diagnosis
/ methods
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychometrics
/ methods
Qatar
Translations
Beck Depression Inventory-II
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
antenatal depression
mental health
validation studies
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 09 2019
13 09 2019
Historique:
entrez:
15
9
2019
pubmed:
15
9
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The current study aimed to validate and determine the psychometric properties of the Arabic versions of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in Qatar. A cross-sectional study design was employed. Antenatal care (ANC) clinics at nine primary healthcare centres. Pregnant women (n=128) aged 15-46 years in different trimesters of pregnancy, attending the ANC clinics as well as capable of reading and writing in the Arabic language. A total of 128 participants were enrolled. On conducting the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the EPDS showed a larger area under the curve at 0.951 than the BDI-II tool (0.912). Using Youden's index, a score To address the under-recognition of antenatal depression, physicians at primary healthcare centres in Qatar should be encouraged to utilise the EPDS to screen pregnant women seeking ANC services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31519679
pii: bmjopen-2019-030365
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030365
pmc: PMC6747648
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e030365Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):436-41
pubmed: 17888811
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009 Jul-Aug;31(4):327-33
pubmed: 19555792
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013 Jun;16(3):203-10
pubmed: 23456541
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Aug 1;91(8):593-601I
pubmed: 23940407
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 10;8(12):e82521
pubmed: 24340036
J Affect Disord. 2015 Jun 1;178:12-7
pubmed: 25770478
J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 1;186:66-73
pubmed: 26231443
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2015 Sep;9(3):219-25
pubmed: 26412626
JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315(4):380-7
pubmed: 26813211
JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315(4):388-406
pubmed: 26813212
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016 Feb;16(1):e35-41
pubmed: 26909211
Depress Res Treat. 2016;2016:4518979
pubmed: 27635258
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Apr;20(2):321-331
pubmed: 28032214
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 24;17(1):112
pubmed: 28340609
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec;71(12):836-842
pubmed: 28767198
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 24;19(1):19
pubmed: 29368585
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:515-521
pubmed: 30599376
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;88(6):1021-5
pubmed: 8942846