Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia.
Data sharing
Donation
Genome
Public
Survey
Trust
Journal
Human genetics
ISSN: 1432-1203
Titre abrégé: Hum Genet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7613873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
08
07
2019
accepted:
09
09
2019
pubmed:
19
9
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
19
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Trust may be important in shaping public attitudes to genetics and intentions to participate in genomics research and big data initiatives. As such, we examined trust in data sharing among the general public. A cross-sectional online survey collected responses from representative publics in the USA, Canada, UK and Australia (n = 8967). Participants were most likely to trust their medical doctor and less likely to trust other entities named. Company researchers were least likely to be trusted. Low, Variable and High Trust classes were defined using latent class analysis. Members of the High Trust class were more likely to be under 50 years, male, with children, hold religious beliefs, have personal experience of genetics and be from the USA. They were most likely to be willing to donate their genomic and health data for clinical and research uses. The Low Trust class were less reassured than other respondents by laws preventing exploitation of donated information. Variation in trust, its relation to areas of concern about the use of genomic data and potential of legislation are considered. These findings have relevance for efforts to expand genomic medicine and data sharing beyond those with personal experience of genetics or research participants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31531740
doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02062-0
pii: 10.1007/s00439-019-02062-0
pmc: PMC6874520
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1237-1246Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 206194
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):103-116
pubmed: 28952070
Community Genet. 2006;9(3):204-10
pubmed: 16741351
Genet Med. 2010 Aug;12(8):486-95
pubmed: 20535021
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50
pubmed: 27209009
Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;137(8):583-591
pubmed: 30116956
Br Med Bull. 2017 Sep 1;123(1):35-45
pubmed: 28910995
Per Med. 2018 Jul 1;15(4):311-318
pubmed: 29856292
J Law Biosci. 2014 Feb 25;1(1):94-110
pubmed: 27774156
Genet Med. 2016 Jul;18(7):663-71
pubmed: 26583683
J Law Med. 2009 Aug;17(1):119-32
pubmed: 19771992
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):417-9
pubmed: 25626040
Struct Equ Modeling. 2013 Jul;20(3):361-383
pubmed: 25419097
Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):721-722
pubmed: 28055021
Nat Med. 2016 May 5;22(5):464-71
pubmed: 27149219
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(2):106-14
pubmed: 22213783
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):316-323
pubmed: 30476628
Hum Genomics. 2018 Mar 7;12(1):13
pubmed: 29514717
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Jun;19(2):177-90
pubmed: 26280642
Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(3):160-72
pubmed: 25790760
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0118027
pubmed: 25761107
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Mar;28(1):257-67
pubmed: 23772759
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2014 Nov;14(8):1053-65
pubmed: 25260013
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Jan;21(1):14-20
pubmed: 22669414
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;162:79-87
pubmed: 27343817
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):404-9
pubmed: 25617016
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 May 1;27(R1):R8-R13
pubmed: 29522190
BMJ. 2016 Jul 14;354:i3636
pubmed: 27418128
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 May;10(5):331-5
pubmed: 19308065
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1014-1015
pubmed: 30102210
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(6):345-52
pubmed: 19940458
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):399-409
pubmed: 20803259
Prev Sci. 2013 Apr;14(2):157-68
pubmed: 21318625