Α de novo 3.8-Mb inversion affecting the EDA and XIST genes in a heterozygous female calf with generalized hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia.
Cattle
EDA
Holstein
Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia
Whole-genome sequencing
XIST
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Sep 2019
18 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
25
04
2019
accepted:
09
09
2019
entrez:
20
9
2019
pubmed:
20
9
2019
medline:
28
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In mammals, hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) is a genetic disorder that is characterized by sparse hair, tooth abnormalities, and defects in cutaneous glands. Only four genes, EDA, EDAR, EDARADD and WNT10A account for more than 90% of HED cases, and EDA, on chromosome X, is involved in 50% of the cases. In this study, we explored an isolated case of a female Holstein calf with symptoms similar to HED. Clinical examination confirmed the diagnosis. The affected female showed homogeneous hypotrichosis and oligodontia as previously observed in bovine EDAR homozygous and EDA hemizygous mutants. Under light microscopy, the hair follicles were thinner and located higher in the dermis of the frontal skin in the affected animal than in the control. Moreover, the affected animal showed a five-fold increase in the number of hair follicles and a four-fold decrease in the diameter of the pilary canals. Pedigree analysis revealed that the coefficient of inbreeding of the affected calf (4.58%) was not higher than the average population inbreeding coefficient (4.59%). This animal had ten ancestors in its paternal and maternal lineages. By estimating the number of affected cases that would be expected if any of these common ancestors carried a recessive mutation, we concluded that, if they existed, other cases of HED should have been reported in France, which is not the case. Therefore, we assumed that the causal mutation was dominant and de novo. By analyzing whole-genome sequencing data, we identified a large chromosomal inversion with breakpoints located in the first introns of the EDA and XIST genes. Genotyping by PCR-electrophoresis the case and its parents allowed us to demonstrate the de novo origin of this inversion. Finally, using various sources of information we present a body of evidence that supports the hypothesis that this mutation is responsible for a skewed inactivation of X, and that only the normal X can be inactivated. In this article, we report a unique case of X-linked HED affected Holstein female calf with an assumed full inactivation of the normal X-chromosome, thus leading to a severe phenotype similar to that of hemizygous males.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In mammals, hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) is a genetic disorder that is characterized by sparse hair, tooth abnormalities, and defects in cutaneous glands. Only four genes, EDA, EDAR, EDARADD and WNT10A account for more than 90% of HED cases, and EDA, on chromosome X, is involved in 50% of the cases. In this study, we explored an isolated case of a female Holstein calf with symptoms similar to HED.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Clinical examination confirmed the diagnosis. The affected female showed homogeneous hypotrichosis and oligodontia as previously observed in bovine EDAR homozygous and EDA hemizygous mutants. Under light microscopy, the hair follicles were thinner and located higher in the dermis of the frontal skin in the affected animal than in the control. Moreover, the affected animal showed a five-fold increase in the number of hair follicles and a four-fold decrease in the diameter of the pilary canals. Pedigree analysis revealed that the coefficient of inbreeding of the affected calf (4.58%) was not higher than the average population inbreeding coefficient (4.59%). This animal had ten ancestors in its paternal and maternal lineages. By estimating the number of affected cases that would be expected if any of these common ancestors carried a recessive mutation, we concluded that, if they existed, other cases of HED should have been reported in France, which is not the case. Therefore, we assumed that the causal mutation was dominant and de novo. By analyzing whole-genome sequencing data, we identified a large chromosomal inversion with breakpoints located in the first introns of the EDA and XIST genes. Genotyping by PCR-electrophoresis the case and its parents allowed us to demonstrate the de novo origin of this inversion. Finally, using various sources of information we present a body of evidence that supports the hypothesis that this mutation is responsible for a skewed inactivation of X, and that only the normal X can be inactivated.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this article, we report a unique case of X-linked HED affected Holstein female calf with an assumed full inactivation of the normal X-chromosome, thus leading to a severe phenotype similar to that of hemizygous males.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31533624
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6087-1
pii: 10.1186/s12864-019-6087-1
pmc: PMC6749632
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ectodysplasins
0
RNA, Long Noncoding
0
XIST non-coding RNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
715Références
Am J Med Genet. 1999 Nov 5;87(1):86-7
pubmed: 10528256
Arch Dermatol. 2000 Feb;136(2):217-24
pubmed: 10677098
Hum Mutat. 2001 Apr;17(4):349
pubmed: 11295832
Eur J Pediatr. 2001 May;160(5):296-9
pubmed: 11388598
Genome Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):656-64
pubmed: 11932250
Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):894-908
pubmed: 12045143
J Appl Genet. 2002;43(1):97-107
pubmed: 12084975
Vet Dermatol. 2002 Dec;13(6):307-13
pubmed: 12464063
Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Dec;51(6):1229-39
pubmed: 1281384
J Comp Pathol. 2005 May;132(4):346-9
pubmed: 15893993
Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Dec;25(24):11122-30
pubmed: 16314532
Cell. 2006 Jun 2;125(5):957-69
pubmed: 16751104
J Biol Chem. 2006 Aug 11;281(32):22429-33
pubmed: 16793760
Cell Cycle. 2006 Nov 1;5(21):2477-83
pubmed: 17102627
Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Jun;15(6):628-37
pubmed: 17342157
Can Vet J. 2007 Jun;48(6):612-4
pubmed: 17616058
Genomics. 2007 Oct;90(4):453-63
pubmed: 17728098
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jan;20(1):104-13
pubmed: 19056871
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jan;5(1):e1000327
pubmed: 19180184
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009 Apr;19(2):122-6
pubmed: 19345091
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(7):1073-81
pubmed: 19561590
Exp Cell Res. 2010 Mar 10;316(5):679-87
pubmed: 20083102
Bioinformatics. 2010 Aug 15;26(16):2069-70
pubmed: 20562413
Hum Mutat. 2011 Jan;32(1):70-2
pubmed: 20979233
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Jan;29(1):24-6
pubmed: 21221095
Hereditas. 2011 Feb;148(1):46-9
pubmed: 21410470
BMC Genet. 2011 Oct 21;12:91
pubmed: 22013926
Anim Genet. 2011 Dec;42(6):578-84
pubmed: 22034998
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Aug;40(15):e115
pubmed: 22730293
Hum Genet. 1990 May;84(6):577-9
pubmed: 2338345
Arch Dis Child. 1987 Oct;62(10):989-96
pubmed: 2445301
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014 Apr 15;306(8):F833-43
pubmed: 24553430
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Nov;171(5):1211-4
pubmed: 24902757
Semin Immunol. 2014 Jun;26(3):220-8
pubmed: 24928340
Nat Genet. 2014 Aug;46(8):858-65
pubmed: 25017103
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 May 03;47:37
pubmed: 25935160
PLoS Genet. 2015 Oct 01;11(10):e1005495
pubmed: 26427027
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Sep 08;6(9):2949-54
pubmed: 27449516
Genes (Basel). 2016 Sep 19;7(9):null
pubmed: 27657131
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 13;7(1):11466
pubmed: 28904385
Nat Genet. 2018 Mar;50(3):362-367
pubmed: 29459679
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 May 7;47(8):3875-3887
pubmed: 30783652
Blood. 1994 May 15;83(10):2899-905
pubmed: 8180385
Genomics. 1993 May;16(2):305-10
pubmed: 8314567
Gene. 1995 Dec 29;167(1-2):GC1-10
pubmed: 8566757
Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1101-8
pubmed: 8651285
Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1111-9
pubmed: 8651287
Genes Dev. 1997 Jan 15;11(2):156-66
pubmed: 9009199
Nat Genet. 1997 Nov;17(3):353-6
pubmed: 9354806
Nat Genet. 1998 Jul;19(3):249-53
pubmed: 9662396