Minimal residual disease undetectable by next-generation sequencing predicts improved outcome in CLL after chemoimmunotherapy.
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Cyclophosphamide
/ administration & dosage
Female
Flow Cytometry
Follow-Up Studies
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Immunotherapy
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
/ blood
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm, Residual
Predictive Value of Tests
Rituximab
/ administration & dosage
Vidarabine
/ administration & dosage
Journal
Blood
ISSN: 1528-0020
Titre abrégé: Blood
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603509
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 11 2019
28 11 2019
Historique:
received:
10
04
2019
accepted:
23
08
2019
pubmed:
21
9
2019
medline:
18
3
2020
entrez:
21
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who achieve blood or bone marrow (BM) undetectable minimal residual disease (U-MRD) status after first-line fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) have prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), when assessed by an assay with sensitivity 10-4 (MRD4). Despite reaching U-MRD4, many patients, especially those with unmutated IGHV, subsequently relapse, suggesting residual disease <10-4 threshold and the need for more sensitive MRD evaluation. MRD evaluation by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has a sensitivity of 10-6 (MRD6). To better assess the depth of remission following first-line FCR treatment, we used NGS (Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation) to assess MRD in 62 patients, all of whom had BM U-MRD by multicolor flow cytometry (sensitivity 10-4) at end-of-FCR treatment. Samples from these patients included 57 BM samples, 29 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples, and 32 plasma samples. Only 27.4% of the 62 patients had U-MRD by NGS. Rate of U-MRD by NGS was lowest in BM (25%), compared with PBMC (55%) or plasma (75%). No patient with U-MRD by NGS in BM or PBMC was MRD+ in plasma. Patients with mutated IGHV were more likely to have U-MRD by NGS at the end of treatment (EOT; 41% vs 13%, P = .02) than those with unmutated IGHV. Median follow-up was 81.6 months. Patients with U-MRD at EOT had superior PFS vs MRD+ patients, regardless of sample type assessed (BM, P = .02, median not reached [NR] vs 67 months; PBMC, P = .02, median NR vs 74 months). More sensitive MRD6 testing increases prognostic discrimination over MRD4 testing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31537528
pii: S0006-4971(20)73185-X
doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001077
pmc: PMC6887113
doi:
Substances chimiques
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Vidarabine
FA2DM6879K
fludarabine
P2K93U8740
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1951-1959Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 1;20(17):4540-8
pubmed: 24970842
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3209-16
pubmed: 22869884
Blood. 2014 Jun 12;123(24):3727-32
pubmed: 24705492
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 22;378(12):1107-1120
pubmed: 29562156
Blood. 2018 Mar 22;131(12):1350-1359
pubmed: 29284596
Blood. 2016 Jan 21;127(3):279-86
pubmed: 26576865
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2680
pubmed: 24157944
Leukemia. 2016 Apr;30(4):929-36
pubmed: 26639181
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jan 1;14(1):155-61
pubmed: 18172266
Blood. 2015 Oct 15;126(16):1921-4
pubmed: 26276669
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;34(31):3758-3765
pubmed: 27573660
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 20;31(33):4199-206
pubmed: 24127452
Leukemia. 2018 Nov;32(11):2388-2398
pubmed: 29769624
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;36(28):2845-2853
pubmed: 30125215
Blood. 2016 Jan 14;127(2):208-15
pubmed: 26486789
Blood. 2016 Jan 21;127(3):303-9
pubmed: 26492934
Blood. 2014 May 15;123(20):3073-9
pubmed: 24646471
Leukemia. 2007 May;21(5):956-64
pubmed: 17361231
Blood. 2015 Jun 11;125(24):3679-87
pubmed: 25887775
Leukemia. 2013 Aug;27(8):1659-65
pubmed: 23419792
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 20;30(9):980-8
pubmed: 22331940
Blood. 2012 Dec 20;120(26):5173-80
pubmed: 23074282
Ann Hematol. 2009 Dec;88(12):1215-21
pubmed: 19340428
Cancer Res. 2001 Feb 15;61(4):1659-65
pubmed: 11245480
Blood. 1996 Jun 15;87(12):4990-7
pubmed: 8652811
Br J Haematol. 2016 Dec;175(5):841-850
pubmed: 27711974
Blood. 2013 Dec 5;122(24):3951-9
pubmed: 24124086
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 1;27(4):491-7
pubmed: 19075280
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4079-88
pubmed: 15767648
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 20;370(12):1101-10
pubmed: 24401022
Lancet Oncol. 2015 May;16(5):541-9
pubmed: 25842160
J Immunother Cancer. 2015 Jun 25;3:29
pubmed: 26113978
Blood. 2018 Dec 6;132(23):2456-2464
pubmed: 30249784