[Status of the availability and use of next generation sequencing (NGS) in bladder cancer-a questionnaire within the uropathology working group].

Status der Verfügbarkeit und Anwendung von „next generation sequencing“ (NGS) beim Harnblasenkarzinom – eine Umfrage in der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Uropathologie.

Journal

Der Urologe. Ausg. A
ISSN: 1433-0563
Titre abrégé: Urologe A
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1304110

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 22 9 2019
medline: 14 3 2020
entrez: 22 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Technical advancement and availability of high-throughput analysis has advanced molecular subtyping of most cancers. Thus, new possibilities for precision oncology have emerged. Therefore, we aimed to collect data regarding availability and use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for urothelial cancer within the uropathology working group of the German Society of Pathology. We collected data by questionnaires and additionally asked for sequencing results of bladder cancers in the participating institutions. A total of 13 university-affiliated institutes of pathology took part in the survey. All university institutes offer NGS-based molecular panel diagnostics and provide panels covering between 15 and 170 genes. Altogether, only 20 bladder cancers were sequenced in routine diagnostics and for 10 cancers potential targeted treatment options were available. So far, despite availability of NGS diagnostics at university institutes of pathology, only few bladder cancer samples have been sequenced. Based on current data from the molecular subtyping of bladder cancers, we recommend a step-by-step protocol with basic immunohistochemistry analysis and subsequent subtype-dependent analyses, e.g., alterations of the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) or comprehensive gene panel analyses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Technical advancement and availability of high-throughput analysis has advanced molecular subtyping of most cancers. Thus, new possibilities for precision oncology have emerged.
AIM OBJECTIVE
Therefore, we aimed to collect data regarding availability and use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for urothelial cancer within the uropathology working group of the German Society of Pathology.
METHODS METHODS
We collected data by questionnaires and additionally asked for sequencing results of bladder cancers in the participating institutions.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 13 university-affiliated institutes of pathology took part in the survey. All university institutes offer NGS-based molecular panel diagnostics and provide panels covering between 15 and 170 genes. Altogether, only 20 bladder cancers were sequenced in routine diagnostics and for 10 cancers potential targeted treatment options were available.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
So far, despite availability of NGS diagnostics at university institutes of pathology, only few bladder cancer samples have been sequenced. Based on current data from the molecular subtyping of bladder cancers, we recommend a step-by-step protocol with basic immunohistochemistry analysis and subsequent subtype-dependent analyses, e.g., alterations of the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) or comprehensive gene panel analyses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31541269
doi: 10.1007/s00120-019-01046-2
pii: 10.1007/s00120-019-01046-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

ger

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

318-325

Références

Bladder Cancer. 2016 Jan 7;2(1):37-47
pubmed: 27376123
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):157-165
pubmed: 27870574
Eur Urol. 2008 Oct;54(4):835-43
pubmed: 18166262
Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov;29(11):1282-91
pubmed: 18951446
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 15;18(12):3377-86
pubmed: 22553347
Cancer Cell. 2014 Feb 10;25(2):152-65
pubmed: 24525232
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Nature. 2014 Mar 20;507(7492):315-22
pubmed: 24476821
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):360-6
pubmed: 24018021
Cell. 2017 Oct 19;171(3):540-556.e25
pubmed: 28988769
J Hematol Oncol. 2014 Jul 20;7:47
pubmed: 25042800
Cell. 2017 Feb 9;168(4):584-599
pubmed: 28187282
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Jan;39(1):127-31
pubmed: 25118812
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 25;111(8):3110-5
pubmed: 24520177
Cancer Discov. 2018 Aug;8(8):OF6
pubmed: 29950346

Auteurs

N Ortiz-Brüchle (N)

Institut für Pathologie, Uniklinikum, RWTH Aachen, Pauelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.

M Muders (M)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.

M Toma (M)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.

I Esposito (I)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

A Hartmann (A)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.

R Stöhr (R)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.

H Reis (H)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland.

P Wild (P)

Dr. Senckenbergisches Institut für Pathologie, Frankfurt, Deutschland.

J Köllermann (J)

Dr. Senckenbergisches Institut für Pathologie, Frankfurt, Deutschland.

F Bremmer (F)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.

J Leichsenring (J)

Molekularpathologisches Zentrum, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

A Stenzinger (A)

Molekularpathologisches Zentrum, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

S Merkelbach-Bruse (S)

Institut für Pathologie, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland.

S Kirfel (S)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.

S Perner (S)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Pathologie, Forschungszentrum Borstel, Leibniz Lungenzentrum, Borstel, Deutschland.

N Hartmann (N)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.

W Roth (W)

Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.

A Jung (A)

Pathologisches Institut, LMU München, München, Deutschland.

T Kirchner (T)

Pathologisches Institut, LMU München, München, Deutschland.

K Schwamborn (K)

Institut für Pathologie, TU München, München, Deutschland.

N Pfarr (N)

Institut für Pathologie, TU München, München, Deutschland.

E Dahl (E)

Institut für Pathologie, Uniklinikum, RWTH Aachen, Pauelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.

R Knüchel (R)

Institut für Pathologie, Uniklinikum, RWTH Aachen, Pauelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.

N T Gaisa (NT)

Institut für Pathologie, Uniklinikum, RWTH Aachen, Pauelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland. ngaisa@ukaachen.de.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH