[Status of the availability and use of next generation sequencing (NGS) in bladder cancer-a questionnaire within the uropathology working group].
Status der Verfügbarkeit und Anwendung von „next generation sequencing“ (NGS) beim Harnblasenkarzinom – eine Umfrage in der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Uropathologie.
Bladder cancer
Molecular pathology
Next generation sequencing
Precision oncology
Targeted treatment
Journal
Der Urologe. Ausg. A
ISSN: 1433-0563
Titre abrégé: Urologe A
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1304110
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
22
9
2019
medline:
14
3
2020
entrez:
22
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Technical advancement and availability of high-throughput analysis has advanced molecular subtyping of most cancers. Thus, new possibilities for precision oncology have emerged. Therefore, we aimed to collect data regarding availability and use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for urothelial cancer within the uropathology working group of the German Society of Pathology. We collected data by questionnaires and additionally asked for sequencing results of bladder cancers in the participating institutions. A total of 13 university-affiliated institutes of pathology took part in the survey. All university institutes offer NGS-based molecular panel diagnostics and provide panels covering between 15 and 170 genes. Altogether, only 20 bladder cancers were sequenced in routine diagnostics and for 10 cancers potential targeted treatment options were available. So far, despite availability of NGS diagnostics at university institutes of pathology, only few bladder cancer samples have been sequenced. Based on current data from the molecular subtyping of bladder cancers, we recommend a step-by-step protocol with basic immunohistochemistry analysis and subsequent subtype-dependent analyses, e.g., alterations of the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) or comprehensive gene panel analyses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Technical advancement and availability of high-throughput analysis has advanced molecular subtyping of most cancers. Thus, new possibilities for precision oncology have emerged.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
Therefore, we aimed to collect data regarding availability and use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for urothelial cancer within the uropathology working group of the German Society of Pathology.
METHODS
METHODS
We collected data by questionnaires and additionally asked for sequencing results of bladder cancers in the participating institutions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 13 university-affiliated institutes of pathology took part in the survey. All university institutes offer NGS-based molecular panel diagnostics and provide panels covering between 15 and 170 genes. Altogether, only 20 bladder cancers were sequenced in routine diagnostics and for 10 cancers potential targeted treatment options were available.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
So far, despite availability of NGS diagnostics at university institutes of pathology, only few bladder cancer samples have been sequenced. Based on current data from the molecular subtyping of bladder cancers, we recommend a step-by-step protocol with basic immunohistochemistry analysis and subsequent subtype-dependent analyses, e.g., alterations of the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) or comprehensive gene panel analyses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31541269
doi: 10.1007/s00120-019-01046-2
pii: 10.1007/s00120-019-01046-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
318-325Références
Bladder Cancer. 2016 Jan 7;2(1):37-47
pubmed: 27376123
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):157-165
pubmed: 27870574
Eur Urol. 2008 Oct;54(4):835-43
pubmed: 18166262
Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov;29(11):1282-91
pubmed: 18951446
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 15;18(12):3377-86
pubmed: 22553347
Cancer Cell. 2014 Feb 10;25(2):152-65
pubmed: 24525232
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Nature. 2014 Mar 20;507(7492):315-22
pubmed: 24476821
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):360-6
pubmed: 24018021
Cell. 2017 Oct 19;171(3):540-556.e25
pubmed: 28988769
J Hematol Oncol. 2014 Jul 20;7:47
pubmed: 25042800
Cell. 2017 Feb 9;168(4):584-599
pubmed: 28187282
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Jan;39(1):127-31
pubmed: 25118812
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 25;111(8):3110-5
pubmed: 24520177
Cancer Discov. 2018 Aug;8(8):OF6
pubmed: 29950346