Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care.
Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Caregivers
/ psychology
Cognitive Dysfunction
/ psychology
Dementia
/ psychology
Expert Testimony
Female
Geriatrics
/ methods
Humans
Male
Needs Assessment
Qualitative Research
Reminder Systems
Robotics
Self-Help Devices
/ psychology
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
/ methods
delirium and cognitive disorders
geriatric medicine
information technology
mental health
old age psychiatry
qualitative research
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 09 2019
24 09 2019
Historique:
entrez:
26
9
2019
pubmed:
26
9
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This research is part of an international project to design and test a home-based healthcare robot to help older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early dementia. The aim was to investigate the perceived usefulness of different daily-care activities for the robot, developed from previous research on needs. Qualitative descriptive analysis using semistructured interviews. Two studies were conducted. In the first study, participants watched videos of a prototype robot performing daily-care activities; in the second study, participants interacted with the robot itself. Interviews were conducted at a university and a retirement village. In study 1, participants were nine experts in aged care and nine older adults living in an aged care facility. In study 2, participants were 10 experts in aged care. The themes that emerged included aspects of the robot's interactions, potential benefits, the appearance, actions and humanness of the robot, ways to improve its functionality and technical issues. Overall, the activities were perceived as useful, especially the reminders and safety checks, with possible benefits of companionship, reassurance and reduced caregiver burden. Suggestions included personalising the robot to each individual, simplifying the language and adding more activities. Technical issues still need to be fixed. This study adds to knowledge about healthcare robots for people with MCI by developing and testing a new robot with daily-care activities including safety checks. The robot was seen to be potentially useful but needs to be tested with people with MCI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31551392
pii: bmjopen-2019-031937
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031937
pmc: PMC6773341
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e031937Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Jul;29(7):906-9
pubmed: 3741503
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Apr;22(2 Dementia):404-18
pubmed: 27042901
Lancet. 2006 Apr 15;367(9518):1262-70
pubmed: 16631882
Med Inform Internet Med. 2004 Jun;29(2):87-94
pubmed: 15370989
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Mar 18;7(1):17
pubmed: 25815063
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jan;14(1):34-40
pubmed: 23098418
Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Dec;51(4):724-31
pubmed: 22103234
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Oct;21(5):949-65
pubmed: 19602305
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Jul;13(6):489-92
pubmed: 22682696
Neuropsychol Rev. 2016 Jun;26(2):129-59
pubmed: 27393566
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1099.e1-1099.e4
pubmed: 28974463
Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jul 23;7:141
pubmed: 26257646
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jan-Feb;54(1):121-6
pubmed: 21349593
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jan;74:15-25
pubmed: 28926749
Australas J Ageing. 2015 Mar;34(1):27-32
pubmed: 24373064
Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92
pubmed: 14583691
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;14(10):858-65
pubmed: 10521885
Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Mar;12(2):535-51
pubmed: 23318684