Expression of Drosera rotundifolia Chitinase in Transgenic Tobacco Plants Enhanced Their Antifungal Potential.


Journal

Molecular biotechnology
ISSN: 1559-0305
Titre abrégé: Mol Biotechnol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9423533

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 27 9 2019
medline: 26 3 2020
entrez: 27 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this study, a chitinase gene (DrChit) that plays a role in the carnivorous processes of Drosera rotundifolia L. was isolated from genomic DNA, linked to a double CaMV35S promoter and nos terminator in a pBinPlus plant binary vector, and used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tobacco. RT-qPCR revealed that within 14 transgenic lines analysed in detail, 57% had DrChit transcript abundance comparable to or lower than level of a reference actin gene transcript. In contrast, the transgenic lines 9 and 14 exhibited 72 and 152 times higher expression level than actin. The protein extracts of these two lines exhibited five and eight times higher chitinolytic activity than non-transgenic controls when measured in a fluorimetric assay with FITC-chitin. Finally, the growth of Trichoderma viride was obviously suppressed when the pathogen was exposed to 100 μg of crude protein extract isolated from line 9 and line 14, with the area of mycelium growth reaching only 56.4% and 45.2%, of non-transgenic control, respectively. This is the first time a chitinase from a carnivorous plant with substrate specificity for long chitin polymers was tested in a transgenic plant with the aim of exploring its antifungal potential.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31555964
doi: 10.1007/s12033-019-00214-1
pii: 10.1007/s12033-019-00214-1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antifungal Agents 0
Chitin 1398-61-4
Chitinases EC 3.2.1.14

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

916-928

Subventions

Organisme : Slovenská Akadémia Vied
ID : VEGA 2/0075/17

Références

J Exp Bot. 2006;57(11):2775-84
pubmed: 16829546
Plant J. 2004 Aug;39(3):440-9
pubmed: 15255872
J Proteomics. 2012 Aug 3;75(15):4844-52
pubmed: 22705321
Plant Physiol. 1993 Mar;101(3):857-863
pubmed: 12231736
J Bacteriol. 1998 Aug;180(15):3735-40
pubmed: 9683465
Carbohydr Res. 2012 Nov 1;361:170-4
pubmed: 23026711
Science. 1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1194-7
pubmed: 17776411
Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2016 Jan-Feb;63(1):77-85
pubmed: 25639923
Planta. 2016 Jan;243(1):115-30
pubmed: 26350069
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2016 Jan;22(1):69-76
pubmed: 27186020
3 Biotech. 2018 Sep;8(9):391
pubmed: 30175028
Transgenic Res. 1995 Jul;4(4):288-90
pubmed: 7655517
J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2004 Jul 30;60(1):29-38
pubmed: 15236908
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2003;8(3):809-24
pubmed: 12949620
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
pubmed: 942051
Biotechnol Lett. 2016 Jun;38(6):1021-32
pubmed: 26875090
Plant Pathol J. 2015 Sep;31(3):252-8
pubmed: 26361473
Plant Biotechnol J. 2015 Jun;13(5):664-74
pubmed: 25418882
Plant Physiol. 2006 Oct;142(2):722-30
pubmed: 16891545
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 7;95(14):7860-5
pubmed: 9653105
Plant Physiol. 1988 Oct;88(2):270-5
pubmed: 16666294
Plant Mol Biol. 2003 May;52(1):161-76
pubmed: 12825697
Biotechnol Lett. 2012 Jun;34(6):995-1002
pubmed: 22350290
Plant Physiol. 2001 Apr;125(4):1880-90
pubmed: 11299367
Biochem J. 1993 Aug 1;293 ( Pt 3):781-8
pubmed: 8352747
Planta. 2006 Sep;224(4):740-9
pubmed: 16362326
Genetics. 1992 Mar;130(3):665-76
pubmed: 1312981
Biotechnol Lett. 2013 Nov;35(11):1719-32
pubmed: 23794096
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Aug;15(8):997-1009
pubmed: 28081289
Mol Biotechnol. 2012 Feb;50(2):129-36
pubmed: 21688039
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45
pubmed: 11328886
Mol Biotechnol. 2017 Dec;59(11-12):499-517
pubmed: 28828714
Planta. 2017 Feb;245(2):313-327
pubmed: 27761648
Plant Cell. 1994 Mar;6(3):417-426
pubmed: 12244242
Planta. 2005 Dec;222(6):1020-7
pubmed: 16049675
FEBS J. 2012 Oct;279(19):3639-3651
pubmed: 22831795
Mol Biol Rep. 2013 Mar;40(3):2127-38
pubmed: 23192611
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006;44:135-62
pubmed: 16602946
Plant Biotechnol J. 2003 Sep;1(5):321-36
pubmed: 17166131
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Anal Biochem. 1993 Jan;208(1):74-9
pubmed: 8434798
J Mol Model. 2012 Nov;18(11):4761-80
pubmed: 22684798
Transgenic Res. 2006 Feb;15(1):57-68
pubmed: 16475010

Auteurs

Dominika Durechova (D)

Institute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Plant Science Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademicka 2, P. O. Box 39A, 950 07, Nitra, Slovak Republic.

Martin Jopcik (M)

Institute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Plant Science Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademicka 2, P. O. Box 39A, 950 07, Nitra, Slovak Republic.

Miroslav Rajninec (M)

Institute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Plant Science Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademicka 2, P. O. Box 39A, 950 07, Nitra, Slovak Republic.

Jana Moravcikova (J)

Institute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Plant Science Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademicka 2, P. O. Box 39A, 950 07, Nitra, Slovak Republic.

Jana Libantova (J)

Institute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Plant Science Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademicka 2, P. O. Box 39A, 950 07, Nitra, Slovak Republic. jana.libantova@savba.sk.

Articles similaires

Biofilms Candida albicans Quorum Sensing Candida glabrata Menthol
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Aldehydes Biotransformation Flavoring Agents Lipoxygenase
Humans Retrospective Studies Male Female Child

Mutational analysis of Phanerochaete chrysosporium´s purine transporter.

Mariana Barraco-Vega, Manuel Sanguinetti, Gabriela da Rosa et al.
1.00
Phanerochaete Fungal Proteins Purines Aspergillus nidulans DNA Mutational Analysis

Classifications MeSH