Pollination intensity and paternity in flowering plants.
Floral traits
male reproductive success
paternity
pollen competition
pollen limitation
pollen sorting
pollination
pollination intensity
pollinator
post-pollination
sexual selection
siring success
Journal
Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 01 2020
08 01 2020
Historique:
received:
15
07
2019
revised:
06
09
2019
accepted:
01
10
2019
pubmed:
6
10
2019
medline:
19
3
2020
entrez:
6
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Siring success plays a key role in plant evolution and reproductive ecology, and variation among individuals creates an opportunity for selection to act. Differences in male reproductive success can be caused by processes that occur during two stages, the pollination and post-pollination phases of reproduction. In the pollination phase, heritable variation in floral traits and floral display affect pollinator visitation patterns, which in turn affect variation among plants in the amount of pollen exported and deposited on recipient stigmas. In the post-pollination phase, differences among individuals in pollen grain germination success and pollen tube growth may cause realized paternity to differ from patterns of pollen receipt. The maternal plant can also preferentially provision some developing seeds or fruits to further alter variation in siring success. In this review, we describe studies that advance our understanding of the dynamics of the pollination and post-pollination phases, focusing on how variation in male fitness changes in response to pollen limitation. We then explore the interplay between pollination and post-pollination success, and how these processes respond to ecological factors such as pollination intensity. We also identify pressing questions at the intersection of pollination and paternity and describe novel experimental approaches to elucidate the relative importance of pollination and post-pollination factors in determining male reproductive success. The relative contribution of pollination and post-pollination processes to variation in male reproductive success may not be constant, but rather may vary with pollination intensity. Studies that quantify the effects of pollination and post-pollination phases in concert will be especially valuable as they will enable researchers to more fully understand the ecological conditions influencing male reproductive success.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Siring success plays a key role in plant evolution and reproductive ecology, and variation among individuals creates an opportunity for selection to act. Differences in male reproductive success can be caused by processes that occur during two stages, the pollination and post-pollination phases of reproduction. In the pollination phase, heritable variation in floral traits and floral display affect pollinator visitation patterns, which in turn affect variation among plants in the amount of pollen exported and deposited on recipient stigmas. In the post-pollination phase, differences among individuals in pollen grain germination success and pollen tube growth may cause realized paternity to differ from patterns of pollen receipt. The maternal plant can also preferentially provision some developing seeds or fruits to further alter variation in siring success.
SCOPE
In this review, we describe studies that advance our understanding of the dynamics of the pollination and post-pollination phases, focusing on how variation in male fitness changes in response to pollen limitation. We then explore the interplay between pollination and post-pollination success, and how these processes respond to ecological factors such as pollination intensity. We also identify pressing questions at the intersection of pollination and paternity and describe novel experimental approaches to elucidate the relative importance of pollination and post-pollination factors in determining male reproductive success.
CONCLUSIONS
The relative contribution of pollination and post-pollination processes to variation in male reproductive success may not be constant, but rather may vary with pollination intensity. Studies that quantify the effects of pollination and post-pollination phases in concert will be especially valuable as they will enable researchers to more fully understand the ecological conditions influencing male reproductive success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31586397
pii: 5581764
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz159
pmc: PMC6948204
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-9Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Ecol Lett. 2016 May;19(5):497-509
pubmed: 26970246
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Feb;6(1):36-41
pubmed: 12495749
Ann Bot. 2019 Oct 18;124(3):423-436
pubmed: 31115446
Evolution. 1993 Jun;47(3):915-924
pubmed: 28567910
Am J Bot. 2002 Oct;89(10):1570-8
pubmed: 21665583
New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):530-45
pubmed: 19552694
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):498-513
pubmed: 26928008
Science. 1986 Jun 27;232(4758):1625-7
pubmed: 17812141
Ann Bot. 2010 Jan;105(1):7-22
pubmed: 19875519
J Evol Biol. 2016 Aug;29(8):1631-42
pubmed: 27206242
Am Nat. 2010 Jun;175(6):717-26
pubmed: 20408751
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120393
pubmed: 25793619
Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1379-83
pubmed: 19218584
Ann Bot. 2019 Jan 23;123(2):225-245
pubmed: 30535041
Evolution. 2019 Jan;73(1):4-14
pubmed: 30411337
Evolution. 1990 Sep;44(6):1454-1468
pubmed: 28564301
Evolution. 2012 May;66(5):1344-59
pubmed: 22519776
J Evol Biol. 2012 Feb;25(2):352-64
pubmed: 22151952
Evolution. 1996 Jun;50(3):1137-1146
pubmed: 28565276
Ann Bot. 2019 Jan 23;123(2):347-354
pubmed: 29878057
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 May;22(5):395-410
pubmed: 28412035
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1337-1349
pubmed: 28563779
Am J Bot. 2007 Jul;94(7):1183-92
pubmed: 21636485
Ecology. 2016 Nov;97(11):3091-3098
pubmed: 27870049
Am Nat. 2009 Sep;174(3):382-98
pubmed: 19627226
Ann Bot. 2016 Feb;117(2):341-7
pubmed: 26658101
Experientia Suppl. 1987;55:317-35
pubmed: 2961602
Evolution. 1989 Aug;43(5):1097-1109
pubmed: 28564159
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 7;267(1456):1925-9
pubmed: 11075703
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):199-211
pubmed: 24418954
Am J Bot. 1990 Feb;77(2):178-187
pubmed: 30139079
Ecol Lett. 2017 Mar;20(3):375-384
pubmed: 28116770
J Evol Biol. 2007 Jul;20(4):1361-74
pubmed: 17584231
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1920 Feb;6(2):66-70
pubmed: 16576461
Evolution. 1991 Sep;45(6):1458-1467
pubmed: 28563828
Heredity (Edinb). 1948 Dec;2(Pt. 3):349-68
pubmed: 18103134
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Mar 22;271(1539):553-9
pubmed: 15156911
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):541-52
pubmed: 26542842
Oecologia. 1987 Nov;74(1):20-23
pubmed: 28310409
Evolution. 1989 Mar;43(2):335-346
pubmed: 28568562
Am Nat. 2014 Aug;184(2):ii-iv
pubmed: 25058291
Am J Bot. 2001 Feb;88(2):242-57
pubmed: 11222247
Ann Bot. 2012 Feb;109(3):563-70
pubmed: 21880660
Am J Bot. 2006 Sep;93(9):1306-12
pubmed: 21642195
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):460-70
pubmed: 26905086
Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1679-1684
pubmed: 28568636
Evolution. 2013 Aug;67(8):2194-206
pubmed: 23888845
Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1862 Oct;30(60):312-318
pubmed: 30163543
Evolution. 1990 Jul;44(4):843-856
pubmed: 28569039
Theor Appl Genet. 1985 Sep;70(6):684-6
pubmed: 24253129
Am J Bot. 2005 May;92(5):885-90
pubmed: 21652470
Evolution. 1998 Feb;52(1):19-29
pubmed: 28568138
Oecologia. 1996 Jan;105(2):230-235
pubmed: 28307087
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 29;358(1434):1009-18
pubmed: 12831466
Am Nat. 2017 May;189(5):549-563
pubmed: 28410019
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 03;8(10):e76312
pubmed: 24098473
Am J Bot. 1998 Jan;85(1):48
pubmed: 21684879
Ann Bot. 2016 Feb;117(2):291-7
pubmed: 26482653
Am J Bot. 2019 Aug;106(8):1131-1136
pubmed: 31403705
Am J Bot. 1998 Oct;85(10):1389-97
pubmed: 21684892
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):553-67
pubmed: 26872491
Ann Bot. 2009 Apr;103(6):941-50
pubmed: 19202136
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):484-97
pubmed: 26933012
Ann Bot. 2019 Jan 23;123(2):263-276
pubmed: 29982325
Evolution. 1992 Aug;46(4):1181-1198
pubmed: 28564412
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:393-413
pubmed: 25621518
Evolution. 1987 Mar;41(2):355-371
pubmed: 28568753
Evolution. 1992 Aug;46(4):1030-1042
pubmed: 28564404
New Phytol. 2017 May;214(3):1381-1389
pubmed: 28240377
Ann Bot. 2019 Jan 23;123(2):247-261
pubmed: 30032269
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 21;368(1613):20120051
pubmed: 23339242
Evolution. 1989 Mar;43(2):318-334
pubmed: 28568547
Am J Bot. 2016 Aug;103(8):1524-8
pubmed: 27539262
Am J Bot. 2003 Nov;90(11):1604-11
pubmed: 21653335
Am J Bot. 2003 Nov;90(11):1612-8
pubmed: 21653336
Sex Plant Reprod. 2009 Sep;22(3):187-96
pubmed: 20033439