External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) and High-Dose-Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy for Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: The Impact of EBRT Volume.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Androgen Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Brachytherapy
/ adverse effects
Cohort Studies
Databases, Factual
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kallikreins
/ blood
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Micrometastasis
/ radiotherapy
Progression-Free Survival
Prospective Studies
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Radiotherapy, Conformal
/ statistics & numerical data
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ statistics & numerical data
United Kingdom
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2020
01 03 2020
Historique:
received:
11
07
2019
revised:
10
09
2019
accepted:
13
09
2019
pubmed:
15
10
2019
medline:
15
2
2020
entrez:
15
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Whole pelvis radiation therapy (WPRT) may improve clinical outcomes over prostate-only radiation therapy (PORT) in high-risk prostate cancer patients by sterilization of micrometastatic nodal disease, provided there is optimal control of the primary site. A prospective multicenter cohort study of eligible patients (stage ≥T2c, Gleason score ≥7 or presenting prostate-specific antigen ≥10) treated between 2009 and 2013 were enrolled in a United Kingdom national protocol delivering combined external beam radiation therapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Centers elected to deliver WPRT, 46 Gy in 23 fractions or PORT 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions with 15 Gy single dose high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The primary endpoint was biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal toxicity. This was not a randomized comparison and was subject to bias; the findings are therefore hypothesis generating, but not conclusive. Eight hundred and twelve patients were entered; 401 received WPRT and 411 received PORT. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 5-year bPFS rates for WPRT versus PORT arms were 89% versus 81% (P = .007) for all patients and 84% versus 77% (P = .001) for high-risk patients. Differences in bPFS remained significant after accounting for Gleason score, presenting prostate-specific antigen, T stage, and androgen deprivation therapy duration as covariates. There was no difference in overall survival. The overall post treatment toxicities across both cohorts were low with no greater than 1.5% of ≥grade 3 toxicities at any follow-up time point. WPRT increased both prevalence and cumulative incidence of acute genitourinary toxicity (P = .004) and acute gastrointestinal toxicity (P = .003). No difference in late radiation toxicity was observed. A significant improvement in 5-year bPFS was seen in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer treated with WPRT compared with PORT in a combined external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy schedule with no increase in late radiation toxicity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31610249
pii: S0360-3016(19)33877-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.044
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
KLK3 protein, human
EC 3.4.21.-
Kallikreins
EC 3.4.21.-
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
525-533Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.