External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) and High-Dose-Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy for Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: The Impact of EBRT Volume.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 03 2020
Historique:
received: 11 07 2019
revised: 10 09 2019
accepted: 13 09 2019
pubmed: 15 10 2019
medline: 15 2 2020
entrez: 15 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Whole pelvis radiation therapy (WPRT) may improve clinical outcomes over prostate-only radiation therapy (PORT) in high-risk prostate cancer patients by sterilization of micrometastatic nodal disease, provided there is optimal control of the primary site. A prospective multicenter cohort study of eligible patients (stage ≥T2c, Gleason score ≥7 or presenting prostate-specific antigen ≥10) treated between 2009 and 2013 were enrolled in a United Kingdom national protocol delivering combined external beam radiation therapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Centers elected to deliver WPRT, 46 Gy in 23 fractions or PORT 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions with 15 Gy single dose high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The primary endpoint was biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal toxicity. This was not a randomized comparison and was subject to bias; the findings are therefore hypothesis generating, but not conclusive. Eight hundred and twelve patients were entered; 401 received WPRT and 411 received PORT. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 5-year bPFS rates for WPRT versus PORT arms were 89% versus 81% (P = .007) for all patients and 84% versus 77% (P = .001) for high-risk patients. Differences in bPFS remained significant after accounting for Gleason score, presenting prostate-specific antigen, T stage, and androgen deprivation therapy duration as covariates. There was no difference in overall survival. The overall post treatment toxicities across both cohorts were low with no greater than 1.5% of ≥grade 3 toxicities at any follow-up time point. WPRT increased both prevalence and cumulative incidence of acute genitourinary toxicity (P = .004) and acute gastrointestinal toxicity (P = .003). No difference in late radiation toxicity was observed. A significant improvement in 5-year bPFS was seen in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer treated with WPRT compared with PORT in a combined external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy schedule with no increase in late radiation toxicity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31610249
pii: S0360-3016(19)33877-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.044
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Androgen Antagonists 0
KLK3 protein, human EC 3.4.21.-
Kallikreins EC 3.4.21.-
Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

525-533

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Hannah Tharmalingam (H)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Yatman Tsang (Y)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom.

Ananya Choudhury (A)

University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Roberto Alonzi (R)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom.

James Wylie (J)

The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Imtiaz Ahmed (I)

Southend University Hospital, Southend, United Kingdom.

Ann Henry (A)

St James Hospital, Leeds, United Kingom.

Catherine Heath (C)

Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Peter J Hoskin (PJ)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: peterhoskin@nhs.net.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH