Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 17 06 2019
accepted: 03 10 2019
entrez: 22 10 2019
pubmed: 22 10 2019
medline: 20 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The goal of this study was to explore conceptual benefits of characterizing delineated target volumes based on surface area and to utilize the concept for assessing risk of therapeutic toxicity in radiosurgery. Four computer-generated targets, a sphere, a cylinder, an ellipsoid and a box, were designed for two distinct scenarios. In the first scenario, all targets had identical volumes, and in the second one, all targets had identical surface areas. High quality stereotactic radiosurgery plans with at least 95% target coverage and selectivity were created for each target in both scenarios. Normal brain volumes V12Gy, V14Gy and V16Gy corresponding to received dose of 12 Gy, 14 Gy and 16 Gy, respectively, were computed and analyzed. Additionally, V12Gy and V14Gy volumes and values for seven prospective toxicity variables were recorded for 100 meningioma patients after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Multivariable stepwise linear regression and best subset linear regression analyses were performed in two statistical software packages, SAS/STAT and R, respectively. In a phantom study, for the constant volume targets, the volumes of 12 Gy, 14 Gy and 16 Gy isodose clouds were the lowest for the spherical target as an expected corollary of the isoperimetric inequality. For the constant surface area targets, a conventional wisdom is confirmed, as the target volume increases the corresponding volumes V12Gy, V14Gy and V16Gy also increase. In the 100-meningioma patient cohort, the best univariate model featured tumor surface area as the most significantly associated variable with both V12Gy and V14Gy volumes, corresponding to the adjusted R2 values of 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. Two statistical methods converged to matching multivariable models. In a univariate model, target surface area is a better predictor of spilled dose to normal tissue than target largest dimension or target volume itself. In complex multivariate models, target surface area is an independent variable for modeling radiosurgical normal tissue toxicity risk.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31634366
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224047
pii: PONE-D-19-17036
pmc: PMC6802845
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0224047

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Neurosurg. 2000 Dec;93 Suppl 3:219-22
pubmed: 11143252
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S36-41
pubmed: 20171516
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S3-9
pubmed: 20171515
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;38(6):600-4
pubmed: 26595685
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;49(6):681-9
pubmed: 24694282
J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105 Suppl:194-201
pubmed: 18503356
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S42-9
pubmed: 20171517
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 May 15;21(1):109-22
pubmed: 2032882
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S28-35
pubmed: 20171514
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Feb 1;64(2):419-24
pubmed: 16226848
J ICRU. 2013 Apr;13(1-2):1-2
pubmed: 27335470
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S50-7
pubmed: 20171518
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S20-7
pubmed: 20171513
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Feb 1;34(3):647-54
pubmed: 8621289

Auteurs

Strahinja Stojadinovic (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Yulong Yan (Y)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Andrew Leiker (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Chul Ahn (C)

Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Zabi Wardak (Z)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Tu Dan (T)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Lucien Nedzi (L)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Robert Timmerman (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Toral Patel (T)

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Samuel Barnett (S)

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Bruce Mickey (B)

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Jeffrey Meyer (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH